As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2017February 27, 2020
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||
☐ | Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2)) | |
Definitive Proxy Statement | ||
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant toSection 240.14a-12 |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. | ||||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11. | ||||
1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| ||||
2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| ||||
3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| ||||
4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| ||||
5) | Total fee paid:
| ||||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | ||||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. | ||||
1) | Amount previously paid:
| ||||
2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| ||||
3) | Filing Party:
| ||||
4) | Date Filed:
|
PROXY STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF
2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
April 29, 2020
3550 Lenox Road
Atlanta, Georgia 3032130326
(770) 829-8991829-8000
March 21, 2017, 2020
Dear Shareholder:
The board of directors and officers of Global Payments Inc. join me in extending to you a cordial invitation to attend our 2017 annual meeting2020 Annual Meeting of shareholders.Shareholders. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 3, 2017,April 29, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, at our offices at 3550 Lenox Road, Atlanta, GA 30321.30326. At the annual meeting, shareholders will be asked to vote on four proposals set forth in the Notice of 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the proxy statement following this letter.
In the third quarter of 2019, we completed our merger with Total System Services, Inc., bringing together two industry leaders and positioning the new Global Payments as a premier pure play payments technology company at scale globally. Importantly, the merger accelerates our technology-enabled software-driven strategy, establishing Global Payments as a leading provider of integrated payment solutions, owned software in both merchant and issuing, ande-commerce and omni-channel capabilities. We are pleased to welcome the former shareholders of TSYS to our company and look forward to engaging with you.
Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, it is important that your shares are represented and voted regardless of the size of your holdings. We urge you to vote promptly and submit your proxy via the internet, by telephone or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you decide to attend the annual meeting, you will be able to vote in person, even if you have submitted your proxy previously.
If you have any questions concerning the annual meeting and you are the shareholder of record of your shares, please contact our Investor Relations department at Investor.Relations@globalpay.com or (770)829-8478. If your shares are held by a broker or other nominee (that is, in “street name”), please contact your broker or other nominee for questions concerning the annual meeting.
We look forward to seeing you on May 3.April 29.
Sincerely, | ||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | ||
Chief Executive Officer | Chairman of the Board |
NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
April 29, 2020 9:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time | ||
3550 Lenox Road Atlanta, Georgia |
|
Items of Business
1. | To elect the |
2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive |
3. | To approve |
4. | To ratify the reappointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, or Deloitte, as the Company’s independent public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, |
The shareholders may also transact any other business that may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Record Date
Close of business on March 3, 2017.6, 2020.
On March 21, 2017,, 2020, we mailed a notice of electronic availability of proxy materials to our shareholders. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 3, 20176, 2020 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. If you do not attend the annual meeting, you may vote your shares via the internet or by telephone, as instructed in the Notice of Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials, or if you received your proxy materials by mail, you may also vote by mail.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Submitting your proxy does not affect your right to vote in person if you attend the annual meeting. Instead, it benefits us by reducing the expenses of additional proxy solicitation. Therefore, we urge you to submit your proxy as soon as possible, regardless of whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time before its exercise by (i) delivering written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary, David L. Green, at 10 Glenlake Parkway, North Tower,3550 Lenox Road, Suite 3000, Atlanta, Georgia 30328-3473,30326, (ii) submitting to us a duly executed proxy card bearing a later date, (iii) voting via the internet or by telephone at a later date, or (iv) appearing at the annual meeting and voting in person; provided, however, that no such revocation under clause (i) or (ii) shall be effective until written notice of revocation or a later dated proxy card is received by the Corporate Secretary at or before the annual meeting, and no such revocation under clause (iii) shall be effective unless received on or before 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 2, 2017.April 28, 2020.
When you submit your proxy, you authorize Jeffrey S. Sloan and David L. Green, or either one of them, each with full power of substitution, to vote your shares at the annual meeting in accordance with your instructions or, if no instructions are given, for the election of the director nominees; for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers; for a frequencythe amendment to our articles of every year (1 year) of future advisory votes on compensation of our named executive officers;incorporation; and for the ratification of the reappointment of Deloitte as the Company’s independent public accounting firm. The proxies, in their discretion, are further authorized to vote on any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting, for the election of one or more persons to the board of directors if any of the nominees becomes unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, on matters which the board does not know a reasonable time before making the proxy solicitations will be presented at the annual meeting, or any other matters which may properly come before the annual meeting and any postponements or adjournments thereto.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
|
David L. Green Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
1 | ||||
| 1 | |||
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
8 | ||||
8 | ||||
9 | ||||
9 | ||||
Questions and Answers About Our Annual Meeting and this Proxy Statement | 10 | |||
14 | ||||
Board and Corporate Governance | ||||
21 | ||||
21 | ||||
21 | ||||
22 | ||||
23 | ||||
24 | ||||
27 | ||||
28 | ||||
29 | ||||
30 | ||||
31 | ||||
31 | ||||
32 | ||||
32 | ||||
33 | ||||
34 | ||||
Proposal Two: Advisory Vote to Approve the 2019 Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers | ||||
37 | ||||
39 | ||||
39 | ||||
42 | ||||
44 | ||||
44 | ||||
46 | ||||
49 | ||||
49 | ||||
50 | ||||
50 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in | 54 | |||
56 | ||||
Stock Options Exercised and Stock Vested | 58 | |||
58 | ||||
59 | ||||
Potential Payments | 59 | |||
| ||||
67 |
69 | ||||
70 | ||||
71 | ||||
| ||||
72 | ||||
| ||||
72 | ||||
Delinquent Section 16(a) | 72 | |||
73 | ||||
|
This summaryWe provide below highlights of certain information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement, but does not contain all of the information you should consider before voting your shares.Proxy Statement. As previously reported, on July 27, 2016, our board of directors authorizedit is only a change in our fiscal year to a calendar year-end, following a seven-month transition period from June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, which wesummary, please refer to herein as the “2016 fiscal transition period.” As a result, this shareholder meeting is being accelerated to coincide with the new fiscal year end. For complete information regarding the 2017 annual shareholder meeting, which we refer to as the “annual meeting,” the proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting, and our performance during the 2016 fiscal transition period, please review the entire proxy statement and our Transition2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal transition period, or the Transition Report on Form 10-K. In this proxy statement, the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Global Payments Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.before you vote.
Information About Our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Date and Time: | Wednesday, | |
Place: | Our offices at 3550 Lenox Road, Atlanta, Georgia, | |
Record Date: | March | |
Voting: | Holders of our common stock as of the close of business on the record date may vote at the annual meeting. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote per share for each director nominee and one vote per share for each of the other proposals described below. |
Proposals and Voting Recommendations
Proposal | Board Vote Recommendation | Page Number | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
1 – Election of | FOR each nominee | 14 | ||||||||||||||
2 – Advisory Vote on Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers | FOR | 35 | ||||||||||||||
3 – | FOR | 67 | ||||||||||||||
4 – Ratification of the Reappointment of Our Independent Public Accounting Firm | FOR |
Recent Developments
On September 18, 2019, we consummated our merger with Total System Services, Inc., or TSYS, pursuant to which TSYS merged with and into Global Payments, with Global Payments as the surviving company. The merger positions us as a leading pure play payments technology company providing innovative payments and software solutions to approximately 3.5 million merchant locations and over 1,300 financial institutions across more than 100 countries throughout North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America.
2016 Fiscal Transition PeriodBusiness and Strategy
We seek to leverage the adoption of, and transition to, card, electronic and digital-based payments by expanding our share in our existing markets through our distribution channels and service innovation, as well as through acquisitions to improve our offerings and scale. We also seek to enter new markets through acquisitions, alliances and joint ventures around the world. We intend to continue to invest in and leverage our technology infrastructure and our people to increase our penetration in existing markets.
The key tenets of our strategy include the following:
Grow and control our direct distribution by adding new channels and partners, including expanding our ownership of additional enterprise software solutions with a payments overlay in select vertical markets;
Deliver innovative services by developing value-added applications, enhancing existing services and developing new systems and services to blend technology with customer needs;
Continue to develop seamless multinational solutions for leading global customers;
Leverage technology and operational advantages across our business segments and throughout our global footprint;
Provide customer service at levels that exceed our competition, while investing in technology, training and enhancements to our service offerings; and
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 1
Pursue potential domestic and international acquisitions of, investments in and alliances with companies that have high growth potential, significant market presence, sustainable distribution platforms and/or key technological capabilities.
We experienced strong business and financial performance around the world during the year ended December 31, 2019. Highlights related to our financial condition and results of operations as of December 31, 2019 and for the year then ended include the following:
Consolidated revenues were $4,911.9 million and $3,366.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Consolidated revenues increased by 27.3%45.9% from 2018 to $2.2 billion2019.
Consolidated operating income was $791.4 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period from $1.7 billionyear ended December 31, 2019 compared to $737.1 million for 2018. Our operating margin for the prior-year period, reflecting growth in each of our operating segments and additional revenues from acquired businesses, despiteyear ended December 31, 2019 was 16.1%, compared to 21.9% for the unfavorable effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates of $35.3 million.year ended December 31, 2018.
Net income attributable to Global Payments was $124.9$430.6 million for the 2016 fiscal transition periodyear ended December 31, 2019 compared to $194.8$452.1 million for the prior-year period, reflecting additional intangible amortization expenses of $145.6 million associated with recently acquired businesses, integration expenses associated with our merger with Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., or Heartland, of $91.6 million2018, and the unfavorable effect of fluctuations in foreign currency. Diluteddiluted earnings per share were $0.81was $2.16 for the 2016 fiscal transition periodyear ended December 31, 2019 compared to $1.49$2.84 for the prior-year period.2018.
Total Shareholder Return vs. S&P 500 Index/Peer Company Average
2 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Board and Corporate Governance Highlights
We have adopted leading governance practices that establish strong independent leadership in our boardroom and provide our shareholders with meaningful rights.
Corporate governance highlights include:
☑ | Lead Independent Director |
☑ | Eleven out of twelve directors arenon-employees |
☑ | Ten out of twelve directors are independent |
☑ | Five out of twelve directors are diverse in gender and/or ethnicity |
☑ | Annual election of directors |
☑ | Fully independent Audit, Compensation, and Governance and Nominating Committees |
☑ | Annual board and committee self-evaluations |
☑ | Proxy access for shareholders |
☑ | Majority voting for directors in uncontested elections |
☑ | Minimum stock ownership requirements for NEOs and directors (increased holding requirements for 2020) |
☑ | Limitations on outside board and audit committee service |
☑ | Greater than 75% director attendance at meetings |
☑ | Non-employee directors meet without management present |
☑ | Independent directors meet withoutnon-independent directors present |
☑ | Code of business conduct and ethics for directors |
The board has taken a thoughtful and deliberate approach to board composition to ensure that our directors have backgrounds that collectively add significant value to the strategic decisions made by the Company and enable them to provide oversight of management to ensure accountability to our shareholders. In connection with the merger with TSYS, we increased the size of our board to twelve directors, six of whom were individuals designated by Global Payments, consisting of five independent directors of Global Payments and our Chief Executive Officer, and the remaining six designated by TSYS, consisting of five independent directors and TSYS’ former Chief Executive Officer. The newly constituted board includes five members who are diverse in gender and/or ethnicity.
The composition of our board consists of:
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement – 13
The board has identified the following key qualifications and experience that are important to be represented on the board as a whole in light of our current business strategy and expected needs. The charts below indicate how these qualifications are represented on our board. Information regarding each director’s skills and qualifications can be found within their individual biographies on pages 15-20.
indicates board representation of the qualification |
The following graph comparesWe believe in providing transparent and timely information to our investors. Our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Offer, and Chief Financial Officer, routinely provide information to and receive feedback from our investors in a wide variety of formats, including in our quarterly SEC filings, quarterly earnings conference calls, our Annual Report and proxy statement, regular investor conferences and roadshows, and meetings with individual investors. We have a staff of professionals in our Investor Relations department who are dedicated full time to respond to questions from shareholders and other investors about the cumulative shareholder returns of $100 invested in the S&P 500 Index, our Company and the averageits performance.
4 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
2019 Outreach
During 2019, we held meetings with many of our top institutional investors, during which we discussed a variety of topics that are important to investors, including industry trends, environmental, social and governance, or ESG, matters, Company performance peer groupand operations, and short and long-term strategic direction.
In 2019, we also conducted an expansive shareholder outreach program to gauge support for our executive compensation practices and corporate governance policies and to respond to shareholder input. Accordingly, our management, together with the Chairman of our Compensation Committee, engaged with twenty of our top twenty-four shareholders, including both active and passive investors, representing approximately 65% of our total shares outstanding, on the Company’s executive compensation program. The feedback we received from June 1, 2013 through February 28, 2017, assuming reinvestmentshareholders regarding our executive compensation program was positive, and the vast majority of dividends.
The graph excludes peer group performance for PayPal, Inc.shareholders voted in favor of our program. After evaluating the outcome of the 2019 advisory vote, shareholder feedback and First Data Corp., because these two companies wereinput from our independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee determined that our executive compensation programs are aligned with our compensation philosophy and the Company strategy and decided not publicly traded forto make any material changes to the full period presented above.structure or principles of the program. Importantly, the general shareholder feedback we received indicated that our investors did not have significant issues with either our executive compensation program or the compensation mix of our Chief Executive Officer or any of our other officers.
Recent Corporate Governance Highlights (Page 13)Developments
As a result of engaging with our shareholders and keeping abreast of leading practices, we have taken actions with respect to corporate governance matters, including the following:
Declassified our board and implemented annual election of directors.
Appointed a lead independent director of the board.
Established a number of diversity initiatives to increase representation of diverse individuals in the Company and support and elevate our diverse employees, and enhanced our proxy disclosure with respect to such practices.
Issued our Global Responsibility Report.
Proposing at this annual meeting the amendments to our Articles of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 5
Environmental Sustainability
We are committed to having a positive impact in the markets we serve and communities in which our employees live and work. In 2019, we issued our Global Responsibility Report, which details our recent achievements and initiatives to drive positive change across four pillars, Culture and Values, Environmental Sustainability, Community Impact and Corporate Responsibility. Our board of directors values independent, effective and ethical corporate governance. HighlightsGlobal Responsibility Report (which is not incorporated into this proxy statement) can be found in the Investor Relations section of our corporate governance structure includewebsite athttps://investors.globalpaymentsinc.com. The following are some highlights of our environmental sustainability program:
Focusing on the following:Environment:
|
We are committed to enhancing energy efficiency across our facilities, including supporting renewable energy initiatives. It is our practice to procure new space in
| |
Managing Waste: We have implemented recycling initiatives to limit what we send to landfills and have a formal destruction of data policy to minimize e-waste. In all of our larger offices, our physical recycling policies extend to plastics and glass, and we are in the process of implementing a no Styrofoam initiative globally. | ||
Data Space Initiaties In the U.S., we are actively working to consolidate our data space footprint and are committed to evaluating the environmental impact and green efforts of the facilities where we lease storage capacity. Our largest data centers, which account for the majority of our domestic storage, have a number of green initiatives in place, including renewable power systems and rainwater harvesting and reclamation programs. We are also looking for new and innovative ways to reduce the impact our data has on the environment, which we are increasingly accomplishing through our move to the cloud. | ||
Providing Alternative Transportation: As part of our effort to reduce our carbon footprint, all of our U.S. and a majority of our international offices are located close to public transit. |
Our Company has always prided itself on inclusiveness and embraces the diversity of its employees in all of our geographic regions. We currently do business in over 100 countries in North America, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America, with employees living and working in 38 different countries. We believe that our business is strengthened by a diverse workforce that reflects the communities in which we operate.
In 2018 and continuing in 2019, we built on our history of diversity and inclusion by formally launching a diversity and inclusion initiative, which included establishing a Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council chaired by our President and Chief Operating Officer and consisting of a representative group of our employees. As part of this initiative, we became a signatory to the CEO Action for Diversity and Inclusion™, which is the largestCEO-driven business commitment to advance diversity and inclusion in the workplace.
6 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
In 2019, we took the following actions with respect to our diversity and inclusion practices:
• Expanded the Global Payments Women’s Network, an employee resource group which implements diversity initiatives related to women, including networking and training opportunities. • Launched the Global Payments Pride Network, an LGBTQIA employee resource group chaired by our General Counsel. | ||||
• Received a 100 percent score on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s 2019 Corporate Equality Index™,which is the national benchmarking tool on corporate policies and practices pertinent to the LGBTQIA employees. • Launched the Global Payments Veterans Network, chaired by our Chief Financial Officer, which is committed to increasing veteran inclusion and hiring, and provides volunteer opportunities for Company employees to support veteran-related organization and events. • Launched our Inclusion and Diversity speaker series as an information resource for all employees around the world. • Committed to providing unconscious bias training beginning in 2019 to all of our executives and people managers. • Developed a recruitment strategy with the goal of attracting employees of diverse backgrounds. |
In addition, we believe it is important that the makeup of our board reflects our commitment to diversity and inclusion and are proud that five of the twelve members of our board are diverse in gender or ethnicity. We will continue to measure our progress to ensure our initiatives and programs continue to support our diversity and inclusion goals.
Compensation Philosophy and Highlights (Page 27)
We Do: | We Do Not: | |
☑ Tie pay to financial and share price performance | ||
☑ Retain an independent compensation consultant ☑ Benchmark against our peer group ☑ Conduct an annualsay-on-pay vote ☑ Adjust performance goals under our short-term incentive plan to reflect acquisition impacts ☑ Require Compensation Committee certification of performance results for purposes of NEOs’ compensation ☑ Employ “double-trigger”change-in-control compensation ☑ Have a clawback policy ☑ Impose minimum stock ownership thresholds and holding periods until such thresholds are met | ☒ Provide for excise taxgross-ups ☒ Permit hedging or pledging of our stock | |
| ☒ Re-price or discount stock options or SARs | |
| ☒ Permit liberal share recycling or “net share counting” upon exercise of stock options or SARs ☒ Pay dividend equivalent rights on | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
2 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 7
Core Component | Page | |||||||||
Base Salary | Base salaries are intended to provide compensation consistent with our | 44
| ||||||||
Annual Cash Incentives | Our annual performance plan rewards short-term Company performance, while aligning the interests of our
| |||||||||
Performance Units |
Performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that, after a Performance units are
| |||||||||
Stock Options | Stock options
| |||||||||
Restricted Stock |
Restricted stock granted as part of our annual compensation program | 48
|
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 32019 Compensation Highlights
The following charts show the mix of total target compensation in 2019 (reflecting the new compensation targets for base salary and short-term cash incentive set upon completion of the merger with TSYS) for our Chief Executive Officer and for allthe average of the other named executive officers as a group, based on a weighted average,NEOs, as well as the portion of that compensation that is subject to forfeiture (“at risk”) or performance-based (exclusive of one-time synergy units granted during the 2016 fiscal transition period).performance-based.
CEO TOTAL TARGET COMPENSATION | OTHER NEOs TOTAL TARGET | |
|
|
* | Excludes Mr. Todd, who joined the Company on September 18, 2019. |
8 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Name | Tenure | Principal Occupation | Non- Employee | Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | Governance and Nominating Committee | Technology Committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kriss Cloninger III | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Former President, Aflac Inc. | Yes |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 Years | Chief Executive Officer, Global Payments Inc. | No | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. Thaddeus Arroyo | 6 Months | Chief Executive Officer, AT&T Consumer | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. | 4 Years | Former Vice Chairman, Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John G. Bruno | 6 Years | Chief Operating Officer, Aon, plc | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William | 19 Years | Chairman and Interim CEO of Green Dot Corp. | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joia M. Johnson | 6 Months | Chief Administrative Officer, Hanesbrands Inc. | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth Ann Marshall | 14 Years | Former President of Americas, MasterCard International | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Connie D. McDaniel | 6 Months | Director, Virtus Mutual Fund Family | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William B. Plummer | 3 Years | Former Executive Vice President | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John T. Turner | 6 Months | Chairman of the Board, W.C. Bradley Co. | Yes |
|
Beginning on page 26,52, we provide specific data about the compensation of our “named executive officers,”NEOs as defined by rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, for 2019. Our NEOs for the 2016 fiscal transition period. Our named executive officers include the following individuals:year ended December 31, 2019 were:
Jeffrey S. Sloan, Chief Executive Officer
Cameron M. Bready, President and Chief Operating Officer (and former Chief Financial Officer)
Paul M. Bready,Todd, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dr. Guido F. Sacchi, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer
David L. Green, Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
4 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 9
Questions and Answers About Our Annual Meeting and this Proxy Statement
1. Why did I receive these materials?
This proxy statement is being furnished to solicit proxies on behalf of the board of directors of our Company for use at the 20172020 annual meeting of shareholders and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The annual meeting will be held at our offices at 3550 Lenox Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 3032130326 on Wednesday, May 3, 2017April 29, 2020 at 9:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time.
2. What am I voting on and how does the board of directors recommend that I vote?
Our board of directors recommends that you voteFOR each of the following four proposals scheduled to be voted on at the meeting:
• | Proposal 1: Election of each of the |
• | Proposal 2: Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of |
• | Proposal 3: Approval of amendments to |
• | Proposal 4: Ratification of the reappointment of Deloitte as our independent public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, |
3. Could other matters be decided at the annual meeting?
Yes. The shareholders may transact any other business that may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. If any other matter properly comes before the meeting and you have submitted your proxy, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the board or, if no recommendation is made, in their own discretion.
4. Why did I receive a mailed notice of internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?
As permitted by the SEC, we are making this proxy statement and our TransitionAnnual Report on Form10-K available to our shareholders electronically via the internet. The notice contains instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our TransitionAnnual Report on Form10-K and how to vote online or submit your proxy over the internet or by telephone. You will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail unless you request one, which you may do by following the instructions contained in the notice. We encourage you to take advantage of the electronic availability of proxy materials to help reduce the cost and environmental impact of the annual meeting.
5. How do I vote?
If you received a notice of electronic availability, that notice provides instructions on how to vote by internet, by telephone or by requesting and returning a paper proxy card. You may submit your proxy voting instructions via the internet or telephone by following the instructions provided in the notice. The internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate your identity, to allow you to vote your shares, and to confirm that your voting instructions are properly recorded. If your shares are held in the name of a bank or a broker, the availability of internet and telephone voting will depend on the voting processes of the bank or broker. Therefore, we recommend that you follow the instructions on the form you receive. If you received a printed version of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote by following the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card.
10 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 5
6. What if I change my mind after I vote?
Your submission of a proxy via the internet, by telephone or by mail does not affect your right to attend the annual meeting in person. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised in any of the following ways:
Deliver written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at 10 Glenlake Parkway, North Tower,3550 Lenox Road, Suite 3000, Atlanta, Georgia 30328-3473,30326, or submit to us a duly executed proxy card bearing a later date. To be effective, your notice of revocation or new proxy card must be received by our Corporate Secretary, David L. Green, at or before the annual meeting.
Change your vote via the internet or by telephone at a later date. To be effective, your vote must be received before 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 2, 2017,April 28, 2020, the day before the annual meeting.
Appear at the annual meeting and vote in person, regardless of whether you previously submitted a notice of revocation.
7. Who is entitled to vote?
All shareholders who owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on March 3, 20176, 2020 are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On that date, there were 152,491,982 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, held by approximately 2,180 shareholders of record. Shareholders are entitled to one vote per share.
8. How many votes must be present to hold the annual meeting?
In order for any business to be conducted, the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting must be present, either in person or by proxy. This is referred to as a “quorum.” Abstentions and brokernon-votes (described below) will be treated as present for purposes of establishing a quorum. If a quorum is not present, the annual meeting may be adjourned by the holders of a majority of the shares represented at the annual meeting. The annual meeting may be rescheduled at the time of the adjournment with no further notice of the reconvened meeting if the date, time and place of the reconvened meeting are announced at the adjourned meeting before its adjournment; provided, however, that if a new record date is or must be fixed, notice of the reconvened meeting must be given to the shareholders of record as of the new record date. An adjournment will have no effect on the business to be conducted at the meeting.
9. What are the voting standards for the proposals?
EachProposal 1: Election of directors. Election of the four scheduled proposals will be approved12 directors nominated by our board requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. ThisThat means that athis proposal is approved if the number of shares voted “for” the proposal exceeds the number of shares voted “against” the proposal.
Proposal 2:Say-on-pay. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the NEOs for 2019 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. That means that this proposal is approved if the number of shares voted “for” the proposal exceeds the number of shares voted “against” the proposal.
Proposal 3: Elimination of supermajority voting requirements. Approval of the amendments to our Articles of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of March 6, 2020.
Proposal 4: Independent public accounting firm. Approval of the ratification of the reappointment of Deloitte as our independent public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. That means that this proposal is approved if the number of shares voted “for” the proposal exceeds the number of shares voted “against” the proposal.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 11
10. What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “beneficial owner of shares held in street name?”
Shareholders of record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare, you are the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and we sent the notice of electronic availability directly to you. If you request copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a proxy card.
Beneficial owners of shares held in street name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the notice of electronic availability was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the shareholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. If you request copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a voting instruction form.
6 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
11. What happens if I do not return a proxy or do not give specific voting instructions?
Shareholders of record.record. If you are a shareholder of record and you do not vote via the internet, by telephone or by mail, your shares will not be voted unless you attend the annual meeting to vote them in person. If you are a shareholder of record and you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, then your shares will be voted in the manner recommended by the board of directors on all matters presented in this proxy statement and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the annual meeting.
Beneficial owners of shares held in street name.name. If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your broker will have the discretionary authority to vote your shares only on proposals that are considered “routine.” The only proposal at the annual meeting that is considered routine is the ratification of the reappointment of our independent auditor.registered public accounting firm. All of the other proposals are considered“non-routine,” which means that your broker will not have the discretionary authority to vote your shares with respect to such proposals. Shares for which you do not provide voting instructions and a broker lacks discretionary voting authority are referred to as “brokernon-votes.” Brokernon-votes are counted as present for the purpose of establishing a quorum, but whether they are counted for purpose of voting on proposals depends on the voting standard for the particular proposal. Since each of the scheduled proposals requires approval by a majority of votes cast, abstentions
Abstentions andbroker non-votes will not be counted have the same effect as votes “for” ora vote “against” the proposal. As a result, although abstentionsproposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation and broker non-votes may be counted for the purpose of establishing a quorum for the meeting, theywill have no effect on the voting results.outcome of the vote tore-elect directors, approve the advisory vote on the compensation of the NEOs or ratify the appointment of Deloitte.
12. What should I do if I receive more than one proxy or voting instruction card?
Shareholders may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of the notice of electronic availability, these proxy materials and proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, shareholders who hold shares in more than one brokerage account may receive separate notices for each brokerage account in which shares are held. Shareholders of record whose shares are registered in more than one name will receive more than one notice. You should vote in accordance with all of the notices you receive to ensure that all of your shares are counted.
13. Who pays the cost of proxy solicitation?
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by us. However, shareholders voting electronically (via phone or the internet) should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from internet service providers or telephone companies. In addition to solicitation of shareholders of record by mail, telephone or personal contact, arrangements will be made with brokerage houses to furnish proxy materials to their principals, and we may reimburse them for mailing expenses. Custodians and fiduciaries will be supplied with proxy materials to forward to beneficial owners of common stock.
12 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
14. May I propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual shareholder meeting?
Yes.Proposals for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Rule14a-8): SEC rules establish the eligibility requirements and the procedures that must be followedpermit shareholders to submit proposals for a shareholder’s proposal to be includedinclusion in our proxy statement. Under those rules, anystatement if the shareholder wishing to have aand the proposal consideredmeet the requirements specified in Rule14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. Proposals submitted in accordance with Rule14a-8 for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 20182021 annual shareholder meeting must submit his or her proposal to us in writing on or before November 21, 2017,be received by our Corporate Secretary no earlier than , 2020 and no later than , 2020, which is 120 days before the one year anniversary of the mailing of this proxy statement. Proposals must comply with all applicable SEC rules and our bylaws. In addition, if
Director Nominees for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Proxy Access): Our bylaws permit a shareholder wishes(or a group of no more than 20 shareholders) owning 3% or more of our common stock continuously for at least three years to present a proposal atnominate up to an aggregate limit of two candidates or 20% of our board (whichever is greater) for inclusion in our proxy statement. Notice of such nominees must be received no earlier than , 2020 and no later than close of business on , 2020.
Other Business Proposals/Director Nominees: Our bylaws also set forth the 2018 annual meeting, whether or not the proposal is intended to be included in the 2018 proxy material, our bylaws requireprocedures that the shareholder give advance written notice to us on or after October 22, 2017 and on or before November 21, 2017. A shareholder may be permitted to present a proposal at the 2018 annual meeting, even if the proposal was not included in the 2018 proxy material. In such a case, if the proposal is received after February 4, 2018, which is 45 calendar days prior to the one year anniversary of the mailing of this proxy statement, we believe that the proxy holder would have the discretionary authority granted by the proxy cards (and as permitted under SEC rules) to vote on the proposal on behalf of the shareholders who submitted the proxies.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 7
If a shareholder wishes for the Governance and Nominating Committeemust follow to considernominate a candidate for election as a director recommendedor to propose other business for consideration at shareholder meetings, in each case, not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement (either under proxy access or Rule14a-8), but instead to be presented directly at shareholder meetings. In each case, director nominations or proposals for other business for consideration at the 2021 annual shareholder meeting submitted under these bylaw provisions must be received by our Corporate Secretary between , 2020 and , 2020. Special notice provisions apply under the shareholder for nomination tobylaws if the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or 60 days after the anniversary date.
Our Corporate Secretary address is: 3550 Lenox Road, Suite 3000, Atlanta, GA 30326. Notice must include the information required by our board of directors, the shareholder must submit the recommendationbylaws, which are available without charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at our corporate offices in accordance with the procedures described above. In addition, our bylaws require that, among other things, all shareholder recommendations for director candidates must be in writing and must set forth the shareholder’s name, address and other contact information as well as the following information about the recommended candidate: (i) name, date of birth, business address and residential address, (ii) a complete description of the candidate’s qualifications, experience, background and affiliations, as would be required to be disclosed in the proxy statement pursuant to Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act; (iii) a sworn or certified statement by the candidate in which he or she consents to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as director if elected, and (iv) a written statement from the shareholder making the recommendation stating why such recommended candidate meets the criteria and would be able to fulfill the duties of a director.Secretary.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Exchange Act and is subject to the safe harbors created therein. The forward-looking statements contained herein are generally identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “committed,” “ensure,” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management and on currently available information. Accordingly, our future plans and expectations may not be achieved and our results could differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements as a result of many known and unknown factors, many of which are beyond our ability to predict or control. A detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included in our TransitionAnnual Report on Form10-K. We undertake no responsibility to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement.
8 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 13
Proposal One: Election of Directors
Our board of directors, upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, has nominated directors John G. Bruno, Jeffrey S. Sloanthe individuals identified on the following pages for election as directors. Each nominee is currently a director of Global Payments. The board believes that the qualifications and William B. Plummer,experience of the director nominees, as described below, will continue to contribute to an effective and well-functioning board. For information on the factors the board considers when evaluating candidates for nomination, see “Board and Corporate Governance — Board Membership Criteria” on page 22.
If elected, each a Class II director, to be electednominee will continue to serve as a director until the 2020 annual meetingCompany’s 2021 Annual Meeting of shareholders andShareholders or until their successors arehis or her successor is duly elected and qualified.qualified or he or she resigns or is otherwise removed. Each nominee has agreed to serve as a director if elected.
Our board of directors currently consists of ten members who are divided into three classes,In connection with our merger with TSYS, we amended our bylaws to provide that until the term of office of each class ending in successive years. Each class of directors serves staggered three-year terms. Michael W. Trapp, a Class II director will not stand for re-election at the 20172022 annual meeting of shareholders, due to director age limitations under our corporate governance guidelines. Effective asthe number of March 6, 2017, our board appointed a new director, William B. Plummer, who is standing for election at this annual meeting.
The composition of ourdirectors that comprises the entire board of directors will be twelve, unless changed by the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the board. Until the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, no vacancy on the board created by the resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office or death of a director will be filled by the board, and the board will not nominate any individual to fill such vacancy, unless, in the case of a vacancy created by a continuing Global Payments director, not less than a majority of the continuing Global Payments directors then in office have approved the appointment or nomination (as applicable) to fill such vacancy and, in the case of a vacancy created by a continuing TSYS director, not less than a majority of the continuing TSYS directors then in office have approved the appointment or nomination (as applicable) to fill such vacancy.
Election Process
The Company has a majority voting standard to elect directors in uncontested elections of directors, such as this election. Under the majority voting standard, a nominee must receive a greater number of votes “FOR” than “AGAINST” his or her election. If an uncontested nominee who is currentlyalready a director receives more “AGAINST” votes than “FOR” votes, that director will continue to serve as follows:a “holdover director,” but is required to tender his or her resignation to the board. If the tendered resignation does not expressly require acceptance by the board, the resignation will become effective immediately, or upon the date set forth in the resignation, and there will be a vacancy on the board upon the effective date of the resignation. If the tendered resignation specifies that it is not effective until accepted by the board, the board has the discretion to accept or reject the resignation. In such a case, the Governance and Nominating Committee will promptly consider the tendered resignation and recommend to the board whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. The Company will publicly disclose the board’s decision within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results.
Class I | Class II | Class III | ||||||||
Name | Term Expiration | Name | Term Expiration | Name | Term Expiration | |||||
Mitchell L. Hollin* | 2019 | John G. Bruno* | 2017 | Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. | 2018 | |||||
Ruth Ann Marshall* | 2019 | Jeffrey S. Sloan | 2017 | William I Jacobs* | 2018 | |||||
John M. Partridge* | 2019 | William B. Plummer* | 2017 | Alan M. Silberstein* | 2018 | |||||
Michael W. Trapp*(1) | 2017 |
In each case, the director nominee, if elected, will serve a shorter term in the event of his or her resignation, retirement, disqualification, or removal from office or death. In the event that any of the nominees is unable to serve (which is not anticipated), the persons designated as proxies will cast votes for such other person(s) as they may select.select, subject to the guidelines set forth above. The affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes cast with respect to the director nominee at the annual meeting at which a quorum is present is required for the election of each of the nominees. If a choice is specified on the proxy card by a shareholder, the shares will be voted as specified. If no specification is made, the shares will be voted “FOR” each of the threetwelve nominees.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE
“FOR” “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
14 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Director Nominee Biographies
M. Troy Woods • Chairman since 2019 • Age 68 | Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Woods’ qualifications to serve on the board include his extensive knowledge of TSYS’ business and the payments and technology industry gained through his more than 30 years’ experience at TSYS. In addition, Mr. Woods has valuable leadership and risk management skills and extensive experience in and knowledge of the payment services and financial services industries. Prior to its merger with Global Payments in 2019, Mr. Woods served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of TSYS (July 2014 — September 2019); President and Chief Operating Officer of TSYS (December 2003 — July 2014); Executive Vice President of TSYS (1995 — 2003); Vice President of TSYS (1987 — 1995); Senior Vice President of Consumer Lending of AmSouth Bank (1982 — 1987); Senior Vice President for Card Services of United American Bank (1977 — 1979). | |
Kriss Cloninger III • Lead Independent Director • Independent director since 2019 • Compensation Committee • Age 72 | Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Cloninger’s qualifications to serve on the board include his leadership skills, risk management experience, expertise in corporate strategy development, and experience as both the president and a principal financial officer of a public company with a strong international business. Mr. Cloninger served as the President and member of the board of directors (2001 — 2017), and Chief Financial Officer (1992 — 2015) of Aflac Incorporated, an insurance holding company; and prior to that as Principal with KPMG LLP. Mr. Cloninger serves as a director of Tupperware Brands Corporation and is Chair of its Compensation Committee. He served on the board of TSYS from 2004 and as lead independent director of TSYS from 2017 until the closing of the company’s merger with Global Payments in September 2019. |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement – 915
Nominees for Election as Directors
Biographical and other information about each director nominated for election is set forth below:
Jeffrey S. Sloan
•
•
• | Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Sloan’s qualifications to serve on the board include his more than 26 years of experience in Mr. Sloan has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company (since October 2013); President of the Company (June 2010 — June 2014); Partner, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (2004 — May 2010), where Mr. Sloan led the Financial Technology Group in New York and focused on mergers, acquisitions and corporate finance; Managing Director, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (2001 — 2004); Vice President, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (1998 — 2001); Director, FleetCor Technologies, Inc., a publicly-traded provider of fuel cards and workforce payment products and services (since July 2013). | |
F. Thaddeus Arroyo
•
• Technology Committee (Chair)
• Age | Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Arroyo’s qualifications to serve on the board include his experience in innovation, cyber-security and global business experience and mergers and acquisitions, in addition to his leadership skills and ability to manage technology innovation projects as he has done in various roles at AT&T. Mr. Arroyo serves as the Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Consumer Business (since September 2019). He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Business (2017 — September 2019); CEO of AT&T Mexico, LLC (January 2015 — December 2016); President-Technology Development of AT&T (September 2014 — January 2015); Chief Information Officer of AT&T (2007 — 2014); CIO at Cingular Wireless (2001 — 2007) and in various capacities with Sabre Inc. (1992 — 2001), including Senior Vice President of Product Marketing and Development. |
16 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. • Independent Director since April 2019 • Director since April 2016 • Audit Committee • Age 65 | Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Baldwin’s qualifications to serve on the board include his financial and industry experience, andin-depth knowledge of our business gained from his 16 years of service as a member of Heartland’s executive management team, as well as his many contributions to the growth and success of Heartland during his tenure. Mr. Baldwin has served as Vice Chairman (an executive office), Heartland (June 2012 — April 2016); Interim Chief Financial Officer, Heartland (October 2013 — April 2014); President, Heartland (2007 — June 2012); Chief Financial Officer, Heartland and its predecessor, Heartland Payment Systems LLC (2000 — 2011); Chief Financial Officer, COMFORCE Corp., a publicly-traded staffing company (1998 — 2000); Managing Director, financial institutions advisory business of Smith Barney (1985 — 1998); Vice President, Citicorp (1980 — 1985). Mr. Baldwin currently serves as director of Boomtown Network, Inc., a private company that provides intelligent software and services (since May 2019). | |
John G. Bruno • Independent Director since June 2014 • Compensation Committee (Chair) • Technology Committee • Age 55 | Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Bruno’s qualifications to serve on the board include his extensive executive leadership experience with technology, cyber-security and payments-related matters within the financial services industry through his prior position as Chief Information Officer, and current position as Chief Operations Officer, of Aon, plc, and his service in executive roles at NCR Corporation and Symbol Technologies, Inc. Mr. Bruno has served as Chief Operating Officer (since February 2020), Chief Executive Officer, Data and Analytic Services, and member of the Executive Committee of Aon, plc, a publicly-traded global risk management service provider (since April 2017); Chief Operations Officer (April 2017 — February 2020); Executive Vice President of Enterprise Innovation and Chief Information Officer, Aon, plc | |
| ||
|
10 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 17
Biographical information with respect to our other directors is set forth below:
William I Jacobs
•
• Compensation Committee
• Governance and Nominating Committee
• Age | Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Jacobs’ qualifications to serve on the board include his extensive executive management experience, leadership skills demonstrated throughout his16-year tenure as our Chairman of the board or lead director, board expertise and legal training. The Board believes Mr. Jacobs will continue to provide leadership and consensus building skills on matters of strategic importance. Through his tenure on our board, Mr. Jacobs has acquired an unmatchable breadth of knowledge and understanding of our business, which allows him to offer a unique perspective on the Company’s strategies and operations. Mr. Jacobs served as Chairman of the Company’s | |
• Independent
| ||
• Technology Committee
• Compensation Committee • Age | Skills and Qualifications: Ms. Johnson’s qualifications to serve on the board include her global leadership experience over several corporate functions for publicly traded companies including legal, human resources, corporate social responsibility, government and trade relations, real estate, and corporate security and her domestic and global mergers and acquisitions experience. Ms. Johnson has served as the Chief Administrative Officer of Hanesbrands Inc., |
18 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 11
Ruth Ann Marshall
•
•
• Governance and Nominating Committee
• Age | Skills and Qualifications: Ms. Marshall’s qualifications to serve on the board include her deep knowledge of our business and industry, having served, among other roles, as President, Americas for Ms. Marshall has served as President, Americas for Mastercard International (2000 — 2006) |
• Independent
•
• Audit Committee
•
| Skills and Qualifications: Ms. McDaniel’s qualifications to Ms. McDaniel serves as a director of the Virtus Mutual Fund Family (since 2017) and as an audit committee member of the Virtus Closed End Funds board, which includes the Duff & Phelps Select MLP & Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 19
• Independent
•
•
| Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Plummer’s qualifications to serve on the board include his executive leadership experience, including his service as the Chief Financial Officer of United Rentals, Inc., | |
| Mr. Plummer currently serves as a business consultant/advisor (since February 2019); senior advisor of United Rentals Inc., a publicly traded equipment rental company (October 2018 — January 2019), and before that as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (December 2008 — October 2018), where Mr. Plummer was responsible for the development of the company’s finance activities, investor relations, andco-led its merger, acquisition and divestiture strategies; Chief Financial Officer of Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a publishing and financial information firm (2006 — 2007), where Mr. Plummer set policy for global finance and corporate strategy; Vice President and Treasurer of Alcoa, Inc., an industrial corporation (2000 — 2006), where Mr. Plummer was responsible for global treasury policy and relationship management with commercial and investment banks; director and audit and compensation committee member of Waste Management, Inc., a publicly traded waste management and environmental services company (since August 2019); chairman and a member of the audit committee of Nesco Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded specialty rental equipment to the electric utility, telecom and railend-markets (since April 2019); director of Venture Metals, Inc., a privately held metal recycling company (since August 2019); director and member of the audit committee and technology committee, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., a publisher and service provider in the scientific research, higher education and professional development fields (2003 — 2019); director, UIL Holdings, Inc., an electric and natural gas utility company (2013 — 2015). | |
John T. Turner • Independent Director since September 2019 • Governance and Nominating Committee (Chair) • Audit Committee • Age 63 | Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Turner’s qualifications to serve on the board include his experience in business management, corporate strategy development, including international business, mergers and acquisitions and risk assessment. John T. Turner has served as Chairman of the board of the W.C. Bradley Co., a privately held consumer products and real estate company (since April 2018); director of W.C. Bradley Co. (since 1999); director of TSYS (2003 — September 2019) and chair of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; various capacities with W.C. Bradley Co. and/or its subsidiaries, including President of Bradley Specialty Retailing, Inc. (1979 — 1999). |
There is no family relationship between any of our executive officersNEOs or directors. ThereOther than as described below, there are no arrangements or understandings between any of our directors and any other person pursuant to which any of them was elected as a director, other than arrangements or understandings with the directors solely in their capacities as such.
1220 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement
Board and Corporate Governance
Proxy Access
After engaging in outreach with certain of our shareholders and considering the viewpoints of governance experts and advisors, we believe that the Company should proactively amend its bylaws to adopt proxy access provisions consistent with market practice and other S&P 500 companies. Once and if amended by our board of directors, the bylaws would permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning an aggregate of at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in the Company’s annual proxy materials director nominees constituting the greater of two or 20% of the board, provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy certain procedural and eligibility requirements specified in the bylaws. We believe these parameters balance the benefit to our shareholders with the challenges related to possible proxy contests, turnover in board seats and the challenges of integrating new qualified directors. We intend to propose to the board of directors the amendment to the Company’s bylaws to include the proxy access provisions at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the board of directors.
OurThe board of directors is chaired by Mr. Jacobs, one of our independent directors. Our board believes that Mr. Jacobs’ service as Chairman enhances the independent oversight of management, while continuing to provide the decisive leadership necessary for an effective Chairman. From his 16-year tenure asdoes not have a member of our board and 14-year tenure as either Chairman of the Board or lead director, Mr. Jacobs has acquired a deep knowledge of our history and culture as well as the issues, opportunities and challenges facing our business. As a result, our board believes that Mr. Jacobs is well-positioned to ensure that the board’s time and attention is focused on the most critical matters.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines do not express a formal policy on whether the same personroles of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer should serve asbe separate or combined. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if the ChairmanChairperson of the Board andboard is not an independent director, then the Chief Executive Officer. Although our Chairman ofboard shall appoint a lead director, who shall be an independent director. If the BoardChairperson is an independent director, if in the futureboard may appoint a non-independent director serves aslead independent director.
In connection with the merger with TSYS, Mr. Woods was appointed Chairman of the board and Mr. Cloninger was appointed Lead Independent Director of the board. Until the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, Mr. Woods and Mr. Cloninger may not be removed from their respective positions without the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the board.
Chairperson of the Board the board will appoint a lead director to fulfill the following responsibilities:Duties
✓ | Presides at all meetings of the board (including all executive sessions ofnon-employee directors); |
✓ | Establishes the agenda and meeting schedules for board meetings; |
✓ | Confers with the Chief Executive Officer on the Company’s strategy and strategic plan; |
✓ | Generally approves information provided to the board, board meeting agendas and meeting schedules to ensure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; and |
✓ | Presides over shareholder meetings. |
Lead Independent Director Duties
✓ | Presides at executive sessions of the board’s independent directors; |
✓ | Serves as liaison between the Chairman and independent directors; |
✓ | Serves as a liaison between management, including the Chief Executive Officer, and the independent directors; |
✓ | Assists in creation of agenda and meeting schedules for board meetings; and |
✓ | Approves retention of consultants who report to the full board. |
At least a majority of our directors, and all of the members of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee, must be “independent” based on the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE. Each year, our board of directors reviews the independence of our directors and considers, among other things, relationships and transactions during the past three years between each director or any member of his or her immediate family, on the one hand, and our Company and our subsidiaries and affiliates, on the other hand.
The purpose of the review is to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent as defined under the NYSE listing standards. In February 2017, our board of directors reviewed the independence of our directors and determined that all of our directors, except Messrs. Baldwin and Sloan, are independent under the NYSE listing standards.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 13
The NYSE listing standards provide that to qualify as an “independent” director, in addition to satisfying certain bright-line criteria, our board of directors must affirmatively determine that a director has no material relationship with our Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with our Company). Additional independence requirements established by the SEC and the NYSE apply to members of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. Specifically, Audit Committee members may not accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from our or any of our subsidiaries other than their directors’ compensation, and they may not be affiliated with our Company or any of our subsidiaries. In addition, when affirmatively
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 21
Using these standards for determining the independence of any director who will serve onits members, the board determined that the following directors are independent:
Kriss Cloninger III | John G. Bruno | Ruth Ann Marshall | ||
F. Thaddeus Arroyo | William I Jacobs | Connie D. McDaniel | ||
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. | Joia M. Johnson | William B. Plummer | ||
John T. Turner |
In addition, each member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee our board of directors must consider all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to our Company that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection withand the duties of a member of the Compensation Committee, including (i) the source of compensation of the director, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by our Company to such director; and (ii) whether the director is affiliated with our Company, our subsidiaries or our affiliates.
When making recommendations to our board of directors regarding director candidates, our Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates candidates primarily based onis independent.
The Governance and Nominating Committee believes that diversity is an important factor in determining the following criteria:
In lieu ofconsiders it in making nominee recommendations, although it does not have a formal diversity policy, as part of our Governance and Nominating Committee’s evaluation of director candidates and in addition to other standards the committee may deem appropriate, the committee considers whether each candidate, if elected, assists in achieving a mix of board members that represent a diversity of background, race, gender and experience, among other criteria. The committee seeks members from diverse backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of relevant industry and strategic experience and expertise that, in concert, offer us and our shareholders diversity of opinion and insight in the areas most important to us and our corporate mission. The committee considers the independence of candidates for director nominees, including the appearance of any conflict in serving as a director. Candidates for director nominees who do not meet these criteria may still be considered for nomination if the committee believes the candidate will make an exceptional contribution to our Company and our shareholders. In evaluating nominees, the committee also takes into account the consideration that members of the board of directors should collectively possess a broad range of skills, expertise, industry knowledge and other knowledge, business experience and other experience useful to the effective oversight of our business.
policy. The Governance and Nominating Committee considers candidates for director who are recommended by other members of the board of directors and by management, as well as those identified by any outside consultants who are periodically retained by the committee to assist in identifying possible candidates. The committee will evaluate potential nominees for open board positions suggested by shareholders in accordance with our policies for shareholder proposals and on the same basis as all other potential nominees. See “Questions and Answers About Our Annual Meeting and this Proxy Statement — May I Propose Actions for Consideration at Next Year’s Annual Shareholder Meeting?” for additional information about our policies for shareholder proposals.
Our board of directors has established five standing committees, which include the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee,Key factors the Governance and Nominating Committee the Risk Oversight Committee and the Technology Committee, all of which are comprised exclusively of non-employee directors. The Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Governance and Nominating Committee are comprised exclusively of independent non-employee directors.considers when determining whether to appoint directors include:
•Experience — Particular skills and leadership experience that are relevant to the Company’s strategic vision •Diversity — Diversity of background, race, ethnicity, gender, qualifications, attributes and skills •Age and Tenure — The age and board tenure of each incumbent director •Board Size — The committee periodically evaluates whether a larger or smaller board would be preferable, depending on the board’s needs and the availability of qualified candidates •Board Independence — Independence of candidates for director nominees, including the appearance of any conflict in serving as a director •Board Contribution — Integrity, business judgment and commitment |
1422 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement
The board has identified the following table provides information about current committee membership forkey qualifications and experience that are important to be represented on our board as a whole in light of our current business strategy and expected needs. The charts below indicate how these qualifications are represented on our board based on information provided by our directors. Information regarding each committee:director’s skills and qualifications can be found within their individual biographies on pages 15-20.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chair Member Financial Expert(5)
indicates board |
qualification
We periodically review our board’s composition to ensure that we continue to have the right mix of skills, background and Attendancetenure. The board currently believes that an appropriate size is seven to twelve members, allowing, however, for changing circumstances that may warrant a higher or a lower number. The Governance and Nominating Committee considers director candidates suggested by members of the committee, other directors, shareholders and management, and has engaged the services of third party firms to assist in identifying and evaluating director candidates.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 23
As a result of healthy refreshment over recent years and the Company’s merger with TSYS, which was completed in September 2019, as of the date of this proxy statement, 73% of ournon-employee board members have joined the board in the last five years, and approximately 64% joined the board in the last three years. In addition, 42% of the board is diverse in gender and/or ethnicity. The background and skills of these directors contribute meaningfully to the Company’s strategy for future growth and long-term value creation.
Our bylaws permit a shareholder (or a group of up to 20 shareholders) who has owned at least 3% of our stock continuously for at least three years to submit director nominees for the greater of two individuals or 20% of the board for inclusion in our proxy statement if the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) meet the requirements of the bylaws.
The board also believes that directors develop an understanding of the Company and an ability to work effectively as a group over time that provides substantial value, and therefore a significant degree of continuity year-over-year is beneficial to shareholders and generally should be expected.
The current tenure, independence and diversity composition of our board is as follows:
Board and Committee Membership
Our full board of directors met twofive times during the 2016 fiscal transition period. During the 2016 fiscal transition period, the Audit Committee met two times, the Compensation Committee met three times, and the Technology Committee met two times. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee met twice during the 2016 fiscal transition period.
All2019. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the board, during 2016, including meetings of the committees of which they were members.he or she served, in each case while the director was serving on our board of directors or such committees, as applicable, during 2019. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, all of our directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders, and all of our directors at the time attended the 20162019 annual meeting.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 15
In connection with the merger with TSYS, we amended our bylaws to provide that the board will have four standing committees: an Audit Committee, Responsibilities
Eacha Compensation Committee, a Technology Committee, and a Governance and Nominating Committee. Until the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, the committee charters and our corporate governance guidelines is available in the investor relations section of our website,www.globalpaymentsinc.com, and will be provided free of charge, upon written request of any shareholder addressed to Global Payments Inc., 10 Glenlake Parkway, North Tower, Atlanta, Georgia 30328-3473, Attention: Investor Relations. Each committee is authorized to delegate responsibilities to subcommittees as appropriate. The responsibilitieschairperson of each committee are described below.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, which was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act, helps ensure the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with certain legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of our independent auditor, the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditor, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying all related-party transactions that would require disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K, promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee also prepares a report that is included in this proxy statement. Members of the Audit Committee may not serve simultaneouslyand Compensation Committee is designated from among Global Payments’ directors on the audit committeesboard prior to the merger, and the chairperson of more than two other public companies unless our board of directors determines that such service would not impair the abilityeach of the director to effectively serveTechnology Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee is designated from among the directors who are former TSYS directors. The bylaws provide that the membership of the committees will be, as practicably as possible, evenly split between Global Payments‘ directors on the Audit Committee.
Effective as of March 6, 2017,board prior to the board appointed William B. Plummer as a member of the boardmerger and the Audit Committee. The board has determined that William B. Plummer and Michael W. Trapp qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC and each is an independent director under NYSE listing standards.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee reviews levels of compensation, benefits and performance criteria for our executive officers and administers our equity compensation plans for our named executive officers and other employees. The Compensation Committee also considers our compensation programs from a risk perspective, conducting reviews and risk assessments of our compensation policies and practices and monitoring its compensation consultants, including their independence. See “Corporate Governance — Board Oversight of Risk Management” on page 17 for additional information about the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities relating to risk management.
During the 2016 fiscal transition period, our Compensation Committee retained the services of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or FWC, an independent consulting firm, to provide compensation consulting services for the 2016 fiscal transition period. Our processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, including the role of the independent consultant in determining compensation,directors who are described under “Compensation, Discussion and Analysis — How Compensation Decisions Are Made” beginning on page 28.
None of the members of the Compensation Committee (i) has ever served as an officer or an employee of our Company or any of our subsidiaries or (ii) has ever had any relationship requiring disclosure by us under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee, or similar committee, of any other company that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or Compensation Committee.
Technology Committee
The Technology Committee provides board-level oversight with regard to our technology and information security practices and serves as a liaison between our board of directors and management with regard to such matters. The Technology Committee reviews all of our key initiatives and practices relating to technology and information security, approves significant policies, monitors our compliance with regulatory requirements and industry standards and provides guidance with regard to strategic direction. The Technology Committee helps to ensure that our strategic goals are aligned with our technology strategy and infrastructure and to ensure that we receive
1624 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement
adequate support fromOur board has adopted written charters for each of the standing committees. Each committee charter and our internal technology and information security providers. See “Corporate Governance — Board Oversightcorporate governance guidelines are available in the Investor Relations section of Risk Management” on page 17our website, www.globalpaymentsinc.com. The following table summarizes the primary responsibilities of the committees:
Committee | Primary Responsibilities | |
Audit | The Audit Committee oversees our risk management activities with respect to our enterprise risk exposure and helps ensure (i) the integrity of our financial statements; (ii) our compliance with certain legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the qualifications and independence of our independent public accounting firm; (iv) the performance of our internal audit function and independent public accounting firm; and (v) the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying all related-party transactions that would require disclosure under applicable legal requirements. The Audit Committee also prepares a report that is included in this proxy statement. | |
Compensation | The Compensation Committee has responsibility for approving and evaluating all compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company. The Compensation Committee reviews levels of compensation, benefits and performance criteria for our NEOs, administers our equity compensation plans for our NEOs and other employees and periodically reviews and assesses director compensation. The Compensation Committee also considers our compensation programs from a risk perspective, conducting reviews and risk assessments of our compensation policies and practices and monitoring its compensation consultants, including their independence. The Compensation Committee also oversees and recommends to the full board for approval our management succession plan. See “Board and Corporate Governance — Board Oversight of Risk Management” on page 27 for additional information about the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities relating to risk management. | |
Governance and Nominating | The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for (i) developing and recommending to the board of directors a set of corporate governance principles; (ii) evaluating and making recommendations regarding the structure of the board and its committees; and (iii) identifying, discussing and proposing nominees (including incumbent directors) for open seats on the board of directors, based primarily on the criteria described under “Board and Corporate Governance — Board Membership Criteria” on page 22. The Governance and Nominating Committee is also responsible for annually reviewing each director’s independence. See “Board and Corporate Governance — Board Oversight of Risk Management” on page 27 for additional information about the Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities relating to risk management. | |
Technology | The Technology Committee provides board-level oversight with regard to our technology and information security practices and technology and cyber-risk profile, and serves as a liaison between our board of directors and the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer, Chief Privacy Officer and Data Protection Officers with regard to such matters. The Technology Committee reviews all of our key initiatives and practices relating to technology, information security, cyber-security, disaster recovery, business continuity data and data privacy, recommends approval to the board of significant policies, and monitors our compliance with regulatory requirements and industry standards. The Technology Committee helps to ensure that our strategic goals are aligned with our technology strategy and infrastructure and that we receive adequate support from our internal technology and information security providers. See “Board and Corporate Governance — Board Oversight of Risk Management” on page 27 for additional information. |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 25
The following table provides information about the Technology Committee’s responsibilities relating to risk management.current committee membership and number of meetings held during 2019:
Governance and Nominating Committee
Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | Governance and Nominating Committee | Technology Committee | |||||||||||||||||
M. Troy Woods | ||||||||||||||||||||
Kriss Cloninger III*(1) |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
F. Thaddeus Arroyo*(1) |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.* |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
John G. Bruno* |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
William I Jacobs* |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Joia M. Johnson*(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Ruth Ann Marshall* |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
| ||||||||||||||
Connie D. McDaniel*(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
William B. Plummer*(2) |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | ||||||||||||||||||||
John T. Turner*(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
2019 Meetings |
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
Chair Member
The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for developing and recommending to the board of directors a set of corporate governance principles, evaluating and making recommendations regarding structure of the board and its committees and for identifying, discussing and proposing nominees (including incumbent directors) for open seats on the board of directors, based primarily on the criteria described under “Corporate Governance — Criteria for Board Membership” on page 14. The Governance and Nominating Committee is also responsible for annually reviewing each director’s independence and periodically reviewing and assessing director compensation. See “Corporate Governance — Board Oversight of Risk Management” on page 17 for additional information about the Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities relating to risk management.
* | Independent director. |
(1) | Joined the committee(s) on September 18, 2019. |
(2) | Audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined under SEC rules. |
Risk Oversight Committee26 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
The Risk Oversight Committee oversees the identification, assessment and management of the key risks facing our Company, which it carries out primarily through its oversight of our enterprise risk management program, as further described below under “Corporate Governance — Board Oversight of Risk Management.” In addition, the Risk Oversight Committee oversees our business continuity, disaster recovery and pandemic plans, our insurance program and our vendor management program and serves as a liaison between the full board and management with respect to these matters.
Board Oversight of Risk Management
Our board of directors views the oversight of risk management as one of its key functions, regularly engaging with management to maintain a risk-aware culture where risk management is deeply and pervasively embedded in all of our activities worldwide. As described more fully below, the board fulfils this responsibility both directly and through its standing committees, each of which assists the board in overseeing a part of the Company’s overall risk management.
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Through its oversight of our enterprise risk management program, our board takes a multi-layered approach to this oversight role. The full board engages directly with management to set highhigh-level policy. At least annually, the board discusses with management the appropriate level policyof risk relative to our strategy and receiveobjectives and reviews with management our existing risk management processes and their effectiveness. In addition, the board receives periodic reports on risk management activities from each committee chairman and directly from management,chair while relying on each of its fivefour standing committees to provide morein-depth oversight of specific key risk exposures.
OurThe board has delegated to the Risk Oversight Committee the responsibility to directly oversee our enterprise risk management program. Specifically, subject to oversight by the full board of directors, the Risk Oversight Committee is responsibleresponsibilities for overseeing the process for identifying, assessing and managing the key risks our Company faces, receiving recommendations from management with respect to such risks, and making recommendations to the full board of directors. The committee’s responsibilities related to oversight of the enterprise risk management program are process-oriented, meaning the committee takes steps to ensure that an effective process is in place to identify and managecertain key risk exposures develop a risk mitigation plan and ensure proper reporting on compliance with such plan. Under the direction of the Risk Oversight Committee, weto its committees as follows:
• | Audit Committee. The Audit Committee oversees our risk management activities with respect to our enterprise risk exposure and financial reporting and disclosure obligations as well as our financial management and liquidity risks. The Audit Committee also reviews and evaluates the work of the Enterprise Risk Management Officer and receives reports from such officer regarding the Company’s enterprise risk management program. |
• | Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee oversees our risk management activities with respect to our compensation policies and practices for our directors, NEOs and all other employees, specifically to ensure that our policies and practices promote appropriate approaches to risk management. The Compensation Committee also oversees and recommends to the full board for approval our management succession plan. |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 27
• | Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee oversees our risk management activities with respect to our corporate governance structure at the board and senior management level. At the board level, functions of the Governance and Nominating Committee are intended to ensure that our full board and its other committees continue to operate functionally and with an appropriate degree of independence from management, including by setting and evaluating qualifications for our directors. At the senior management level, the Governance and Nominating Committee promotes a risk-aware culture by, for example, periodically reviewing our employee business code of conduct and ethics. |
• | Technology Committee. The Technology Committee oversees our risk management activities with respect to information technology, information security, cyber-security, disaster recovery, data and data privacy. The Technology Committee reviews and assesses these risks with management and the full Board and ensures that the Company has appropriate policies and programs to identify, manage and mitigate such risks. |
We have established a management risk committee comprised primarily of executive management that is responsible for identifying, assessing, prioritizing and developing action plans to mitigate key risks. The management risk committee reports to the full board or appropriate board committee periodically and more frequently as needed.
Risk oversight responsibilities related to the substance of each identified key risk exposure, such as the application of the board’s risk tolerance in a particular area, are in some cases carried out by the full board without any delegation to a committee. For example, the full board directly oversees our risk management activities with respect to risks associated with our strategic direction. More frequently, oversight
The Board’s Role in Overseeing Cyber-Risk
We employ multiple methods and technologies to secure the Company’s computing environment and ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of defined risk exposuresour information assets. As noted above, technology and cyber-security qualifications and experience is carried out byone of the key factors that our Governance and Nominating Committee considers in its assessment of the board committee with the most relevant subject-matter expertise. In these cases, the relevant board committee carries out these responsibilities utilizing the process established by the Risk Oversight Committee, with reporting obligations to the full board. membership criteria.
Our board has delegated to the Technology Committee the responsibility to oversee the Company’s Information Security Program and cyber-security risk. Specifically, subject to oversight by the full board of directors, the Technology Committee periodically receives reports from the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer, or CISO, on the Company’s cyber-risk profile and information security initiatives. The Company’s Information Security Program is administered by the CISO, who maintains a direct reporting line to both the Technology Committee and the board. At least annually, the Technology Committee receives a formal, enterprise-wide information technology and cyber-security risk oversight responsibilitiesassessment and reviews and recommends the Company’s information security program supporting policies to the full board for evaluation and approval. The Technology Committee regularly reviews and discusses the Company’s technology strategy with the CISO and recommends the Company’s technology strategic plan to the full board for evaluation and approval.
In addition, the board regularly receives information about these topics from the chair of the Technology Committee, the CISO and management and is apprised directly of incidents exceeding certain key risk exposures totolerances.
Evaluation of Board and Committee Effectiveness
Each year, our board and its committees conduct self-evaluations to ensure they are performing effectively and to identify opportunities to improve board and committee performance. The self-assessment is conducted under the oversight of the Governance and Nominating Committee. Anonymous andnon-anonymous evaluation responses are reviewed and assessed during board and committee executive sessions and where appropriate, addressed with management. As part of the board’s self-assessment process, directors consider various topics related to board composition, structure, effectiveness and responsibilities, as follows:
28 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 17
Ournon-employee director compensation plan is designed to attract, retain and compensate highly-qualified directors by providing them with competitive compensation and an equity interest in our Company to align their interests with those of our shareholders. In lieu ofper-meeting fees, we pay ournon-employee directors annual cash and stock retainers, which are payable in advance on the first business day after each annual meeting of shareholders (prorated for partial periods for new directors). We do not pay additional compensation to directors who are also our employees for their service as a director.
Our Governance and NominatingCompensation Committee periodically reviews ournon-employee director compensation plan and makes recommendations as necessary to our full board of directors. We pay our non-employee directors theThe annual cash and stock retainers we pay ournon-employee directors are as set forth below:
Director | Annual Basic Cash Retainer | Annual Supplemental Cash Retainer | Annual Stock Retainer | Annual Basic Cash Retainer | Annual Supplemental Cash Retainer | Annual (FMV) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Employee Chairman(1) | $ | 100,000 | $ | 95,000 | $ | 195,000 | $ | 120,000 | $ | 95,000 | $ | 255,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lead Director(2) | $ | 100,000 | $ | 65,000 | $ | 195,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lead Independent Director | $ | 120,000 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chair of Audit Committee | $ | 100,000 | $ | 22,500 | $ | 155,000 | $ | 120,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chair of Compensation Committee | $ | 100,000 | $ | 20,000 | $ | 155,000 | $ | 120,000 | $ | 20,000 | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chair of Other Committees | $ | 100,000 | $ | 17,500 | $ | 155,000 | $ | 120,000 | $ | 20,000 | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
All Other Non-Employee Directors | $ | 100,000 | N/A | $ | 155,000 | $ | 120,000 | N/A | $ | 200,000 |
(1) | These retainers are payable only if the Chairman of the |
21.
The number of fully-vested shares of our common stock granted as the annual stock retainer is based on the market price of our common stock on the grant date. As a result, on September 29, 2016, Mr. Jacobs received 1,495 shares of common stock, and each of the other non-employee directors received 1,189 shares of common stock, which represent a proration based on a seven-month period to reflect the Company’s transition to the new fiscal year. Directors are also reimbursed for theirout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board and committee meetings.
18 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
All of thenon-employee directors are eligible to participate in ourNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan described under “Corporate“Board and Corporate Governance — Director Compensation —Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan” below. In the 2016 fiscal transition period, only Ms. Marshall is the only current director who participated in 2019, and she did not receive any interest on deferred compensation at an above-market rate of interest.
2016 Fiscal Transition Period2019 Director Compensation TableTable*
The following table summarizes the compensation of ournon-employee directors during the 2016 fiscal transition period. In connection with the change in the Company’s fiscal year from May 31 to December 31, with respect to the base cash retainer, supplemental cash retainer and annual stock retainer paid or granted, as applicable, all amounts shown below reflect a proration based on a seven-month period to reflect the Company’s transition to the new fiscal year. Mr. Plummer was not a director of the Company during the 2016 fiscal transition period and is accordingly omitted from the tables below.2019.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Total ($) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. Thaddeus Arroyo | $ 21,096 | $ 32,087 | $ 53,183 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. | $120,000 | $189,539 | $309,539 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John G. Bruno | $132,055 | $189,539 | $321,594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kriss Cloninger III | $ 25,616 | $ 32,087 | $ 57,703 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William I Jacobs | $ | 113,750 | $ | 113,750 | $ | 227,500 | $195,000 | $230,085 | $425,085 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. | $ | 58,334 | $ | 90,417 | $ | 148,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
John G. Bruno | $ | 73,945 | $ | 90,417 | $ | 164,362 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mitchell L. Hollin | $ | 70,000 | $ | 90,417 | $ | 160,417 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joia M. Johnson | $ 15,068 | $ 32,087 | $ 47,155 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth Ann Marshall | $ | 68,542 | $ | 90,417 | $ | 158,959 | $120,000 | $189,539 | $309,539 | |||||||||||||||||||||
John M. Partridge | $ | 58,334 | $ | 90,417 | $ | 148,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan M. Silberstein | $ | 68,542 | $ | 90,417 | $ | 158,959 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael W. Trapp(3) | $ | 71,459 | $ | 90,417 | $ | 161,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gerald J. Wilkins(4) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Connie D. McDaniel | — | $ 32,087 | $ 32,087 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William B. Plummer | $142,055 | $189,539 | $331,594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John T. Turner | $ 11,301 | $ 32,087 | $ 43,388 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. Troy Woods | $129,589 | $148,825 | $278,414 |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 29
* | For the directors designated by TSYS, compensation was calculated based on the difference between compensation payable under the Global Paymentsnon-employee director compensation plan and the TSYSnon-employee director compensation plan, prorated for partial periods of service as directors and new committee chairs, as applicable, during the applicable twelve-month period. |
(1) | Represents basic and supplemental cash retainers earned during |
(2) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of stock granted on |
Non-Employee Directors | Options Outstanding as of December 31, | ||||
| |||||
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. | — | ||||
John G. Bruno | — | ||||
| |||||
William I Jacobs | 7,224 | ||||
Joia M. Johnson* | 3,123 | ||||
Ruth Ann Marshall | |||||
| 17,106 | ||||
William B. Plummer | — | ||||
| |||||
|
Reflects stock options to purchase shares of TSYS common stock that were outstanding and unexercised prior to the |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. Non-Qualified|2017 Proxy Statement– 19
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Thenon-employee directors are eligible to participate in ournon-qualified deferred compensation plan, or the deferred compensation plan. Ms. Marshall is the only current director who participated in the deferred compensation plan during the 2016 fiscal transition period.2019. Pursuant to the deferred compensation plan,non-employee directors are permitted to elect to defer up to 100% of their annual cash retainer. Participant accounts are credited with earnings based on the participant’s investment allocation among a menu of investment options selected by the deferred compensation plan administrator. Participants are 100% vested in the participant deferrals and related earnings. We do not make contributions to the deferred compensation plan and do not guarantee any return on participant account balances. Participants may allocate their plan accounts intosub-accounts that are payable upon separation from service or on designated specified dates. Except in the case of death or disability, participants may elect in advance to have their various account balances pay out in a single lump sum or in installments over a period of two to ten years. In the event a participant separates from service by reason of death or disability, the participant or his or her designated beneficiary will receive the undistributed portion of his or her account balances in alump-sum payment. Subject to approval by the deferred compensation plan administrator, in the event of an unforeseen financial emergency beyond the participant’s control, a participant may request a withdrawal from an account up to the amount necessary to satisfy the emergency (provided the participant does not have the financial resources to otherwise meet the hardship).
30 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Target Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our board of directors has implemented stock ownership guidelines for our directors in order to foster equity ownership and align the interests of our directors with our shareholders. Within five years of becoming a director, each director is expected to beneficially own a number of shares of our common stock at least equal in value to 500% of the director’s annual cash retainer.
Contacting Our Board of Directors
Any interested party may contact any individual director, ournon-employee or independent directors as a group, or all of our directors by directing such communications to the applicable directors in care of the Corporate Secretary at our address at 10 Glenlake Parkway, North Tower,3550 Lenox Road, Suite 3000, Atlanta, Georgia 30328-3473.30326. Any correspondence received by the Corporate Secretary in accordance with the foregoing will be forwarded to the applicable director or directors.
20 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 31
Common Stock Ownership by Management
The following table sets forth information as of February 28, 201714, 2020 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our named executive officers,NEOs, and (iii) the 1416 persons, as a group, who were directors or executive officersNEOs of our Company on February 28, 2017.14, 2020.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | Shares Beneficially Owned(2) | Shares Issuable Upon Exercise of | Total | Percentage of Class | Shares Beneficially Owned(2) | Shares Issuable Upon Exercise of Stock Options(3) | Total | Percentage of Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan(4) | 278,727 | 162,192 | 440,919 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | 161,929 | 38,646 | 200,575 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | 432,388 | (4) | 229,996 | 662,384 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | 53,202 | 31,166 | 84,368 | * | 99,399 | 45,284 | 144,683 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | 84,862 | 101,859 | 186,721 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | 17,022 | — | 17,022 | * | 34,662 | 31,629 | 66,291 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | 25,549 | 16,476 | 42,025 | * | 58,177 | 50,416 | 108,593 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Employee Director and Director Nominees: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. Thaddeus Arroyo | 2,379 | 4,822 | 7,201 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. | 36,397 | — | 36,397 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John G. Bruno | 12,763 | — | 12,763 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kriss Cloninger III | 36,150 | 11,394 | 47,544 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William I Jacobs | 42,011 | 41,508 | 84,119 | * | 25,988 | 7,224 | 33,212 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.(5) | 306,108 | — | 306,108 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John G. Bruno | 8,290 | — | 8,290 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mitchell L. Hollin | 32,175 | — | 32,175 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth Ann Marshall. | 34,267 | 41,508 | 75,775 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John M. Partridge | 10,984 | — | 10,984 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan M. Silberstein | 49,093 | 30,704 | 79,797 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael W. Trapp(6) | 35,298 | — | 35,298 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joia M. Johnson | 2,950 | 3,123 | 6,703 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth Ann Marshall | 38,799 | 3,224 | 42,023 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Connie D. McDaniel | 10,683 | 17,106 | 27,789 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William B. Plummer | 4,792 | — | 4,792 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John T. Turner(5) | 542,340 | 45,014 | 587,354 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. Troy Woods(6) | 580,602 | 76,274 | 656,876 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group | 1,061,680 | 362,200 | 1,423,880 | * | 2,003,331 | 627,365 | 2,630,696 | * |
* | Less than one percent. |
(1) | The address of each of the directors and officers listed is c/o Global Payments Inc., |
Includes the number of shares of common stock the person “beneficially owns,” as |
(3) | Includes the number of shares that the person had a right to acquire as of, or within 60 days after, February |
(4) | Includes |
(5) | Includes |
(6) | Includes |
32 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 21
Common Stock Ownership byNon-Management Shareholders
The following table sets forth information as of February 14, 20172020 with respect to the only persons who are known by us, based exclusively on such persons’ filings with the SEC under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Exchange Act, to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Shares(1) | ||||||||
FMR LLC(2) | 13,269,443 | 8.63 | % | |||||||
Wellington Management Group LLP(3) | 16,813,689 | 10.94 | % | |||||||
The Vanguard Group(4) | 14,421,726 | 9.38 | % | |||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(5) | 14,197,604 | 9.2 | % | |||||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(6) | 7,969,161 | 5.1 | % |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Shares(1) | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(2) | 20,578,958 | 6.8 | % | |||||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(3) | 37,947,964 | 12.6 | % | |||||||
The Vanguard Group(4) | 23,995,318 | 7.98 | % |
(1) | Percentages calculated based on number of shares outstanding as of February 14, |
(2) | This information is contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed by |
This information is contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. with the SEC on February |
(4) | This information is contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 12, 2020. The Vanguard Group reported sole dispositive power for 23,470,179 shares, shared dispositive power for 525,139 shares, sole voting power for 464,710 shares, and shared voting power for 87,765 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. |
22 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 33
Biographical Information About Our Named Executive Officers
Biographical and other information about each of our current executive officersNEOs is set forth below, except for Mr. Sloan, our Chief Executive Officer, whose biographical information is provided above under “Proposal One: Election of Directors — Nominees for Election as“Other Directors” beginning on page 9.16.
Name | Age | Current Position | Position with Global Payments and
| |||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | 48 | President and Chief | President and Chief Operating Officer (since | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | 49 | Senior Executive Vice | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (since September 2019); Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TSYS (July 2014 – September 2019); Executive Vice President of TSYS (2008-2014); President and Chief Executive Officer of Synovus Financial Management family of companies (2007-2008). | |||||||||||
Dr. Guido F. Sacchi | 56 | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Information | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer (since | |||||||||||
David L. Green | 52 | Senior Executive Vice | Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | (since September 2019); Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (since November 2013); Senior Vice President and Division General Counsel of the Company (November 2011 — November 2013); Vice President and Division General Counsel of the Company (2007 — November 2011). | ||||||||||
|
There are no arrangements or understandings between any of our executive officersNEOs and any other person pursuant to which any of them was appointed an officer, other than arrangements or understandings with our officers acting solely in their capacities as such.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers that is applicable to the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, and an Employee Code of Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all employees. The codes deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct, compliance with laws, rules and regulations and internal reporting of possible legal or ethics violations. In addition, the Company has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics applicable to directors. The Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, the Employees Code of Conduct and Ethics and the Director Code of Conduct and Ethics are available on the Company’s website at:https://investors.globalpaymentsinc.com/corporate-governance.
34 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 23
Proposal Two: Advisory Vote to Approve the 2019 Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers
In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, our board of directors is asking shareholders to approve an advisory resolution on executive compensation. The advisory vote is anon-binding vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.NEOs in 2019. The vote, which is known as a “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” vote, is intended to give our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’NEOs’ compensation. The vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officersNEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. At last year’s annual meeting of shareholders, approximately 98.8%78% of the votes cast were cast in support of the compensation of our named executive officers.NEOs. The text of the resolution is as follows:
Resolved, that the Company’s shareholders APPROVE, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officersNEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the summary compensation table and related compensation tables and narrative discussion.
We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this proxy statement, which discusses how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy. You should also read the summary compensation table and other related compensation tables and narrative disclosure which provide additional details about the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs in the 2016 fiscal transition period.2019. We have designed our compensation and benefits program and philosophy to attract, retain and motivate talented, qualified and committed executive officers who share our philosophy and desire to work toward our goals. We believe that for the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, our executive compensation program aligned individual compensation with the short-term and long-term performance of our Company in ways such as the following:
Pay opportunities were appropriate to the size of our Company when compared to peer companies.
Our compensation program was heavily performance-based, using multiple measures for short-term incentives and a simple, single measure for long-term incentives, as described in this proxy statement.incentives.
Performance metrics under our short-term incentive plan are adjusted to reflect acquisitions that we make.make during the year.
Long-term incentives were linked to shareholder value through performance units, stock options andtime-based restricted stock that change in value as share price fluctuates.
Performance units will result in an either increased or decreased payout multiple based on our total shareholder return performance rank relative to the S&P 500 index.
Perquisites are a minor part of our compensation program.
Excise taxgross-ups are not provided to any of our executive officers.NEOs.
Pursuant to our clawback policy, we may recoup the value of any annual or long-term incentive awards provided to any executive officersNEOs in the event that our financial statements are restated due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement.
Change-in-control severance provisions in employment agreements are double trigger.
The Compensation Committee engages independent compensation consultants.
The Compensation Committee certifies performance results for purposes of executive compensation.
We do notre-price or backdate stock options or issue discounted stock options.
We do not pay dividend equivalent rights with respect to restricted stockperformance units.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 35
The vote regarding the compensation of our named executive officersthe NEOs described in this Proposal No. 2 is advisory, and therefore, is not binding on us or our board. Althoughnon-binding, our board values the opinions
24 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
that shareholders express in their votes and will review the voting results and take them into consideration as it deems appropriate when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation programs as it deems appropriate.programs. Our board of directors has adopted a policy providing for an annualsay-on-pay vote. Unless our board of directors modifies this policy, the nextsay-on-pay vote will be held at our next annual shareholder meeting.meeting in 2021.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
“FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE 2019 COMPENSATION OF OUR
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,NEOs, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
36 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Table of Contents
37 | ||||
39 | ||||
39 | ||||
42 | ||||
44 | ||||
44 | ||||
46 | ||||
49 | ||||
49 | ||||
50 | ||||
50 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
52 | ||||
54 | ||||
56 | ||||
58 | ||||
58 | ||||
59 | ||||
Potential Payments upon Termination, Retirement or Change in Control | 59 |
We experienced strong business and financial performance around the world during the year ended December 31, 2019. Highlights related to our financial condition and results of operations as of December 31, 2019 and for the year then ended include the following:
Consolidated revenues were $4,911.9 million and $3,366.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Consolidated revenues increased by 45.9% from 2018 to 2019.
Consolidated operating income was $791.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $737.1 million for 2018. Our operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2019 was 16.1%, compared to 21.9% for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Net income attributable to Global Payments was $430.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $452.1 million for 2018, and diluted earnings per share was $2.16 for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $2.84 for 2018.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement – 2537
Over theCompensation Discussion and Analysis12-month
2016 Fiscal Transition Period Performance Highlights
The following graph compares the cumulative shareholder returns of $100 invested in the S&P 500 Index, our Company and the average of our performance peer group from JuneJanuary 1, 20132015 through February 28, 2017,December 31, 2019, assuming reinvestment of dividends.
The graph excludes peer group performance for PayPal, Inc.Named Executive Officer Compensation Design, Elements and First Data Corp., because these two companies were not publicly traded for the full period presented above.
26 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
Compensation HighlightsPay Mix
The following charts show the mix of total target compensation in 2019 (reflecting the new compensation targets for base salary and short-term cash incentive set upon completion of the merger with TSYS) for our Chief Executive Officer and for allthe average of the other named executive officers as a group, based on a weighted average,NEOs, as well as the portion of that compensation that is subject to forfeiture (“at risk”) or performance-based (exclusive of one-time synergy units granted during the 2016 fiscal transition period).performance-based.
CEO TOTAL TARGET COMPENSATION | OTHER NEOs TOTAL TARGET | |
|
|
* | Excludes Mr. Todd, who joined the Company on September 18, 2019. |
Our compensation program is aligned with short- and long-term Company performance and reflects best practices to ensure sound corporate governance. As illustrated above, with the exception of base salary and time-based restricted stock awards, all target compensation is performance-based. ExecutivesNEOs are also subject to stock ownership guidelines, and the securities they are required to hold under those guidelines will continue to fluctuate with our share price.
2019 Compensation Highlights
The short-term cash incentives awarded under our annual performance plan incent and reward our executivesNEOs for achievement of short-term goals aligned with our 2016 fiscal transition period2019 operating plan. The long-term incentive plan incents and
38 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
rewards our executivesNEOs for achievement of long-term goals measured over amulti-year period. Together, these plans support our strategy of facilitating the adoption of, and transition to, card, electronic and digital-based payments by expanding our share in existing markets through our distribution channels, new products and services and acquisitions to improve our scale of offerings, while simultaneously seeking expansion into new markets through acquisitions around the world.
OurShort-Term Cash Incentives
The short-term cash incentives awarded under our annual performance plan isare 100% based on achievement of Company performance goals, equally weighted betweenamong adjusted earnings per share, which we refer to as “adjustedadjusted EPS,” adjusted net revenue plus network fees and adjusted operating margin. For the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, each of our named executive officers (identified below)NEOs earned 113%160% of his target under the annual performance plan. These performance goals are discussed below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Short-Term Incentive Plan” beginning on page 31.44.
Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards
The Compensation Committee grants equity-based compensation to our NEOs, consisting of performance units, stock options and restricted stock, to provide long-term incentives and align management and shareholder interests.
Performance Units. Awards under our long-term incentive plan include performance-based restricted stock units, which we refer to as “performance units,” stock options and time-based restricted stock. PerformanceThe metrics under which performance units are earned are based on the achievement of an annual adjusted EPS growth target each year, with the results certified by the Compensation Committee each year of the performance period and averaged over a three-year performance period, and then modified up or down by the Company’s total shareholder return performance rank relative to the S&P 500 index, or the TSR modifier, at the end of the three-year performance period. The maximum possible payout is four times the target number of the performance units and the minimum payout is zero. To the extent earned, performance units convert into unrestricted shares after performance results for the three-year performance period are certified by the Compensation Committee.
Stock Options and Restricted Stock. Stock options and restricted stock vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of theirthe respective grant dates. During the 2016 fiscal transition period, the Compensation Committee also granted a one-time supplemental award of synergy units, which vest, if at all, based upon the achievement of pre-established goals related to the Heartland transaction. The value of each of the long-term incentive awards changes as our share price changes, thereby aligning the interests of our executivesNEOs with those of our shareholders. Awards under our long-term incentive plan for the 2016 fiscal transition period2019 are discussed below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-Term Incentive Plan” beginning on page 33.
46.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 27
The following individuals are identified as “named executive officers”NEOs pursuant to SEC rules for the purpose of describing our compensation for the 2016 fiscal transition period:2019:
Jeffrey S. Sloan, Chief Executive Officer;
Cameron M. Bready, President and Chief Operating Officer;
Paul M. Bready,Todd, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Dr. Guido F. Sacchi, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer; and
David L. Green, Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.
The discussion below explains the detailed information provided in the tables contained in this section and places that information within the context of our overall compensation program. See “Compensation of Named Executive Officers” below for a series of tables containing specific information about the compensation earned or paid into the 2016 fiscal transition period to our named executive officers.NEOs.
How Compensation Decisions Are Made
Objectives of Compensation Policies
Our Compensation Committee designs and at least annually reviews our compensation program with a view to retaining and attracting executive leadership of a caliber and level of experience necessary to manage our
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 39
complex, growth-oriented and global businesses. Our objective is to maintain a compensation program that will allow us to:
support the financial and business objectives of our organization;
attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executives;
create an environment where performance is expected and rewarded;
deliver an externally competitive and transparent total compensation structure; and
align the interests of our executivesNEOs with our shareholders.
In order to achieve these results, our Compensation Committee believes our program must:
provide our executivesNEOs with total compensation opportunities at levels that are competitive for comparable positions in a highly competitive industry;
provide variable,at-risk incentive award opportunities that are payable only payable if specific goals are achieved;
provide significant upside opportunities for outstanding performance;
align our executives’NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders by making stock-based incentives a core element of our executives’NEOs’ compensation; and
protect our competitive position by prohibiting our executive officersNEOs from competing with our Company for a specified period of time following termination of employment.
Our Compensation Committee also considers and assesses potential risk and risk mitigation factors and potential risk aggravators in our compensation program. For the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, our Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation practices are balanced, do not encourage excessive risk taking by our employees,NEOs, and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant
Our Compensation Committee retained Frederic W. Cook, & Co., Inc., or FWC, as its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of FWC and whether its work raised any conflict of interest, taking into consideration the independence factors set forth in applicable SEC and NYSE
28 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
rules, and determined that FWC is independent. FWC took guidance from and reported directly to the Compensation Committee and, solely with respect to non-employee director compensation, the Governance and Nominating Committee. FWC advised the Compensation Committee on current and future trends and issues in executive compensation and on the competitiveness of the compensation structure and levels of our executives, including our named executive officers.NEOs during 2019. At the request of the Compensation Committee and to provide context for the Compensation Committee’s compensation decisions made for the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, FWC performed the following services relating to the Company’s 2016 fiscal transition period compensation:services:
Conducted a market reviewreviews and analysisanalyses for our named executive officersNEOs to determine whether their total targeted compensation opportunities were competitive with positions of a similar scope in similarly sized companies in similar industries;
Prepared tally sheets on our named executive officersNEOs to allow the Compensation Committee to review the reasonableness of the total wealth accumulated during each executive’s tenure with our Company and to show the impact on our Company in the event of a termination of employment; and
All services performed for us by FWC during the 2016 fiscal transition period2019 were related to executive orandnon-employee director compensation.
40 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Market Data
Our Compensation Committee considers the compensation programs and practices and resulting NEO compensation opportunities and levels of selected other companies to assist usit in setting our executiveNEOs’ compensation to ensure that it remains competitive. ForAs a result of the 2016 fiscal transition period, ourmerger with TSYS, the Compensation Committee, requested thatin consultation with FWC, reviewrevised our peer group to reflect the size, scale and suggest potential revisions. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussedcomplexity of the analysis and approved the followingcombined company. Our peer group for compensation benchmarking purposes.2019 was updated to include the below listed companies. The companies in the peer group were chosen because (i) each company in the peer group is in the transaction processing or data services business,technology industry; (ii) each company in the peer group is publicly traded,traded; (iii) at the time the peer group was constructed, our revenues and market cap were near the median of the group as a whole,whole; and (iv) we compete for talent with many of these companies. For the 2016 fiscal transition period, our peer group included the following companies:
|
|
The group of peer companies listed above is the same as the peer group used for fiscal 2016, except for certain changes to ensure that the peer group reflected the Company’s growth resulting from the acquisition of Heartland. In addition to the removal of Heartland, the two smallest companies, Dun & Bradstreet
In connection with the Compensation Committee setsetting the 2016 fiscal transition periodNEO compensation for 2019, FWC collected and analyzed comprehensive market data for the Committee’s use.data. FWC presented market figures representing competitive ranges for base salary, targetshort-term incentive opportunity, and long-term incentive opportunity.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 29
Role of Named Executive Officers
At the beginning of the 2016 fiscal transition period,In 2019, our Chief Executive Officer with the assistance of our human resources department, developed compensation recommendations for the executive officers who reported directly to him (including our named executive officers)NEOs based on market data supplied by FWC, our Company’s performance relative to goals approved by the Compensation Committee and other individual contributions to our performance. The FWC report examined market data from our peer group and analyzed compensation for comparable positions forto our named executive officers.NEOs. The Compensation Committee considered the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations, in conjunction with the counsel of FWC and the market data, in determining the compensation elements for these named executive officers.NEOs. In considering the FWC report, the Compensation Committee primarily considered and reviewed the median level of compensation within the peer group. In setting actual compensation levels for our named executive officers,NEOs, however, the Compensation Committee did not target any element of compensation at a particular percentile or percentile range of the peer group data. Rather, the Compensation Committee uses this information as one input in its decision-making process. The Compensation Committee determined all aspects of Mr. Sloan’s compensation as Chief Executive Officer in consultation with FWC. Mr. Sloan did not participate in the Compensation Committee’s determination of his compensation.
ShareholderSay-on-Pay Vote for Fiscal 20162018 and Compensation Actions Taken
In 2019, we conducted an expansive shareholder outreach program to gauge support for our executive compensation practices, among other topics. Our management, together with the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, engaged with twenty of our top twenty-four shareholders, including both active and passive investors, representing approximately 65% of our total shares outstanding. The feedback we received from shareholders regarding our executive compensation program was positive, and the general shareholder feedback we received indicated that our investors did not have significant issues with either our program or the compensation mix of our Chief Executive Officer or any of our other officers. At last year’s annual meeting of shareholders, approximately 98.8%78% of the votes cast were cast in support of the compensation of our named executive officers.NEOs. The Compensation Committee considered this a positive result and concluded that the shareholders support the compensation paid to our executive officersNEOs and our overall pay practices. In light of this support, the Compensation Committee decided to retain the overall design of our executive compensation program.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 41
The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor best practices, future advisory votes on executive compensation and other shareholder feedback to guide it in evaluating our executiveNEOs compensation program. The Compensation Committee invites our shareholders to communicate any concerns or opinions on executive pay directly to our board of directors. Please refer to “Corporate“Board and Corporate Governance — Contacting Our Board of Directors” on page 2031 for information about communicating with the board of directors.
Elements of Executive Compensation Program
Our Compensation Committee, with guidance from FWC, reviewed the market data for each of our named executive officers and allocated, on an individual basis, the major elements of our compensation, including base salary, short-term incentives and long-term incentives, taking into consideration factors such as the individual’s peer group market position, as well as the individual’s performance, retention, internal equity, individual development and succession planning. The following executive pay at target levels was setwere approved in February 2019 by the Compensation Committee for the 2016 fiscal transition period:2019:
Name | Base Salary* | % of Total | Target Short-Term Cash | % of Total | Target Long-Term | % of Total | Total* | Base Salary | % of Total | Target Short-Term Cash Incentive | % of Total | Target Equity | % of Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 1,000,000 | 12 | % | $ | 1,600,000 | 20 | % | $ | 5,500,000 | 68 | % | $ | 8,100,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | 7 | % | $ | 1,600,000 | 12 | % | $ | 11,000,000 | 81 | % | $ | 13,600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 600,000 | 20 | % | $ | 600,000 | 20 | % | $ | 1,800,000 | 60 | % | $ | 3,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 550,000 | 22 | % | $ | 495,000 | 20 | % | $ | 1,455,000 | 58 | % | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 595,000 | 13 | % | $ | 654,500 | 15 | % | $ | 3,250,000 | 72 | % | $ | 4,499,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 470,000 | 25 | % | $ | 423,000 | 23 | % | $ | 957,000 | 52 | % | $ | 1,850,000 | $ | 515,000 | 19 | % | $ | 515,000 | 19 | % | $ | 1,750,000 | 62 | % | $ | 2,780,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 435,000 | 26 | % | $ | 369,750 | 22 | % | $ | 845,000 | 51 | % | $ | 1,649,750 | $ | 510,000 | 22 | % | $ | 459,000 | 20 | % | $ | 1,325,000 | 58 | % | $ | 2,294,000 |
Total Long-Term Equity Incentives includes (i) performance units reflected at target; (ii) restricted stock awards; and (iii) stock options. |
The annual compensation program also includes other benefits, including limited perquisites and a nonqualifiednon-qualified deferred compensation plan.plan, as described below.
Compensation Actions Following Completion of Merger with TSYS
Adjustments to Base Salary and Short-Term Cash Incentive
Effective September 22, 2019, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with FWC, revised our peer group to reflect the size, scale and complexity of the combined company and, after considering, among other inputs, the market data on comparable positions provided by FWC from our revised peer group, approved the following adjustments to salary and the target short-term cash incentive for our NEOs, other than Mr. Sloan. The Compensation Committee did not increase any of the components of Mr. Sloan’s compensation following the merger with TSYS. The increases to base salary and target short-term incentive opportunities for the NEOs, other than Mr. Sloan, were prorated for the period between September 22, 2019 and December 31, 2019.
Name | Base Salary at the end of December 31, 2019 | Target Short-Term Cash Incentive the end of December 31, 2019 | ||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $700,000 | $805,000 | ||||||||
Paul M. Todd | $680,000 | $714,000 | ||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $575,000 | $575,000 | ||||||||
David L. Green | $550,000 | $550,000 |
Synergy Awards
On September 18, 2019, we completed our transformative merger with TSYS. The purchase price for the merger exceeds all of our prior acquisitions combined. The Compensation Committee, with input from its independent consultant, adopted a synergy incentive program intended to award participants, including our NEOs, for achieving synergy goals in connection with this landmark transaction. The merger is expected to deliver cost and annualrun-rate revenue synergies primarily through combining business operations, aligninggo-to-market strategies, streamlining technology infrastructure, eliminating duplicative corporate and operational functions,
3042 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement
From timescale efficiencies, and cross-selling complementary technology solutions through the combined direct distribution network.
The program is designed to time,incentivize the participants to maximize synergies related to the merger. Aligning the synergy initiatives of the TSYS merger to the compensation of our key personnel, including our NEOs, will drive the achievement of the initiatives which, in turn, will increase the accretive nature of the transaction and create value for our shareholders, much as we did with the Heartland merger.
The awards to the NEOs are in the form of performance-based units that are eligible to vest based on achievement of cost and revenue synergy goals, as described below, over a three-year performance period. The grant date fair value of the synergy performance units is included in the Summary Compensation Table for the 2019 calendar year. The Compensation Committee further determined that, during the performance period for the synergy incentive program, it would include the value of the synergy performance units when determining annual NEO compensation.
Under the synergy incentive program, the performance units are earned based upon the achievement ofpre-established synergy goals set by our Compensation Committee also may approve certain supplemental awards. Duringfor the 2016 fiscal transitionthree-year performance period from September 18, 2019 to September 18, 2022. The number of shares issued, if any, will be based on the Company’s achievement of target cost synergies of at least $350 million and target revenue synergies of at least $125 million. The resulting payout multiple for cost synergies and revenue synergies would be averaged together to determine the payout multiple applied to the target award, and will range from 0% to 200% of target for our Compensation Committee approvedChief Executive Officer and implemented0% to 300% of target for our other NEOs. However, if target performance is not achieved for either cost synergies or revenue synergies, then the payout multiple applied to the target award will be capped at a maximum of 100% of target.
The following chart summarizes the target and maximum award opportunities pursuant to the synergy incentive program for each of our NEOs.
Name | Target | Target Number of Synergy Performance Units Granted(1) | Maximum Number of Synergy Performance Units | ||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 4,500,000 | 27,381 | 54,762 | |||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 4,000,000 | 24,339 | 73,017 | |||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | $ | 2,000,000 | 12,170 | 36,510 | |||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 2,000,000 | 12,170 | 36,510 | |||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 2,000,000 | 12,170 | 36,510 |
(1) | Calculated as the target allocation of synergy performance units (in dollars) divided by our share price on the closing date of the TSYS merger ($164.35). |
Depending on the Compensation Committee’s certification of the achievement of the synergy goals as presented by an independent accounting firm, each of the NEOs may earn an award up to the maximum award set forth above. Achievement of synergies below target will result in connection withzero payout. Achievement between target and maximum will result in a payout interpolated between the Heartland transaction,target and maximum payouts. Our Compensation Committee has the final authority to determine whether a specific item qualifies as described in more detailcost savings under the synergy incentive program. Half of any earned synergy performance units will convert into unrestricted shares on page 36.September 18, 2022 and the remaining units will convert to unrestricted shares on September 18, 2023.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 43
Base salary provides our executive officersNEOs with a level of compensation consistent with their skills, responsibilities, experience and performance in relation to comparable positions in the marketplace. The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our NEOs annually and may do so more frequently upon a change in circumstances.
Base salary represented 12%7% of our Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation target and 23%18% of the total compensation target for our other named executive officers (basedNEOs (on an average basis and excluding Mr. Todd who joined the Company on a weighted average)September 18, 2019). It is the one component of compensation that does not fluctuate with either our Company’s performance and/or the value of our stock. The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our executive officers annually. After an evaluation by the Compensation Committee of the factors described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — How Decisions Are Made — Market Data” on page 29, Messrs. Mangum, Bready and Green received increases in their base salaries for the 2016 fiscal transition period as compared to fiscal 2016.
The base salaries for our named executive officers forNEOs in effect at the 2016 fiscal transition period,end of 2019, compared to their base salaries in effect at the end of fiscal 2016,2018, are set forth below (on an annualized basis):below:
Name | TP 2016 (annualized) | Fiscal 2016 | % Change | Base Salary at the end of December 31, 2019 | 2018 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | — | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 600,000 | $ | 585,000 | 3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 550,000 | $ | 530,000 | 4% | $ | 700,000 | $ | 585,000 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | $ | 680,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 470,000 | $ | 470,000 | — | $ | 575,000 | $ | 500,000 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 435,000 | $ | 400,000 | 9% | $ | 550,000 | $ | 500,000 | 10 | % |
The Compensation Committee considers adjustments to base salary for our named executive officers on an annual basis and may do so more frequently upon a change in circumstances. The Compensation Committee determined to increase the salaries of Messrs. Mangum, Bready and Green for the 2016 fiscal transition periodand Dr. Sacchi in February 2019 after considering, among other inputs, the market data on comparable positions from our peer group set forth in the FWC report, including but not limited to the median level of compensation for comparable positions.positions, retention, internal equity, individual development and succession planning. The Compensation Committee also considered Mr. Sloan’s assessment of Messrs. Mangum, Bready and Green. Green and Dr. Sacchi.
In connection with the completion of the merger with TSYS in September 2019, the Compensation Committee engaged FWC to review the Company’s competitive peer group and to update its review and competitive assessment of the Company’s executive compensation program based on the updated peer group, if any. Based on such assessment, the Compensation Committee determined to revise the peer group as set forth on page 41, and increase the salaries of Messrs. Bready and Green and Dr. Sacchi again in September 2019. The Compensation Committee did not increase Mr. Sloan’s salary in 2019.
The Compensation Committee does not use a specific formula for evaluating the individual performance of each named executive officer.NEO. The Compensation Committee makes each assessment taking into consideration the competitiveness of each named executive officer’sNEO’s pay opportunity, the quality and effectiveness of each named executive officer’sNEO’s leadership and their respective contribution to the Company’s financial and operational success, as well as the totality of the executive’s performance.
Under our short-term incentive plan, we provide our named executive officersNEOs with short-term incentive opportunities to motivate and reward them for the achievement of our defined business goals and objectives. Our short-term incentive plan provides an opportunity for executivesNEOs to earn variableat-risk cash compensation and is designed to allow annual incentive awards that are fully deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code as further described under “Compensation, Discussion and Analysis — Tax Considerations” on page 38 below.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 2017 Proxy Statement– 31cash.
Target Bonus Opportunities
For the 2016 fiscal transition period, after its review of the market data, ourThe Compensation Committee approved the followingconsiders adjustments to target bonus opportunities for each of our named executive officers, expressed ason an annual basis and may do so more frequently upon a percentage of base salary:change in circumstances.
Target Bonus Opportunity* | % of Base Salary | |||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 1,600,000 | 160 | % | ||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 600,000 | 100 | % | ||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 495,000 | 90 | % | ||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 423,000 | 90 | % | ||||||
David. L. Green | $ | 369,750 | 85 | % |
44 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
In determining
As discussed above, upon completion of the target bonus opportunities for each named executive officer for the 2016 fiscal transition period, the Compensation Committee consideredmerger with TSYS, after review of the market data for bonus target opportunity and target total cash compensation opportunity for comparable positions withinwith our peer group, as reflected inupdated after the FWC report, and the Compensation Committee’s general assessmentcompletion of the Chief Executive Officer, andmerger with TSYS, our Compensation Committee approved the Chief Executive Officer’s assessment and recommendationsfollowing target bonus opportunities for each of the NEOs, expressed as a percentage of base salary. The Compensation Committee did not increase the target bonus opportunity of Mr. Sloan in 2019 following the completion of the merger with respect to the other named executive officers. TSYS.
Target Bonus Opportunity(1) | % of Base Salary | |||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 1,600,000 | 160 | % | ||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 805,000 | 115 | % | ||||||
Paul M. Todd | $ | 714,000 | 105 | % | ||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 575,000 | 100 | % | ||||||
David. L. Green | $ | 550,000 | 100 | % |
(1) | Reflects annualized pay opportunity. Amounts paid with respect to the increase in target bonus opportunity approved in September 2019 were prorated for the period from September 22, 2019 through December 31, 2019. |
The Compensation Committee does not use a specific formula for evaluating the individual performance of each named executive officer.NEO. The Compensation Committee makes each assessment taking into consideration the quality and effectiveness of each named executive officer’sNEO’s leadership and their respective contribution to the Company’s financial and operational success, as well as the totality of the executive’s performance.
Performance Metrics
For the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, the Compensation Committee allocated the target opportunity under the short-term incentive plan evenly among the following three performance metrics: adjusted EPS, adjusted net revenue plus network fees and adjusted operating margin, which are non-GAAP financial measures.margin. See Appendix A to this proxy statement for a description of the calculation of these measures.
Adjusted EPS is a primary metric management uses to more clearly focus on the economic benefits to our core business and other factors we believe are pertinent to the daily management of our operations. We use adjusted net revenue because we believe it demonstrates ourthese performance in further penetrating our global footprintmetrics to set goals for and executing against our market opportunities. We use adjusted operating margin because we believe it allows us to assess the quality and efficiency of our operations to promote a long-term outlook.determine incentive compensation.
Because these performance metrics are calculated for the sole purpose of determining compensation, they may differ from similarnon-GAAP financial measures reported elsewhere in Company filings. For each of these separately-calculated performance metrics, each named executive officerNEO could earn upfrom 0% to 200% of the target opportunity.
Degree of Performance Attainment | Adjusted EPS | Adjusted Net Revenue Weighted 33% | Adjusted Operating Margin Weighted 33% | Total Opportunity | ||||||||||||||||
Maximum | 200 | % | 200 | % | 200 | % | 200 | % | ||||||||||||
Target | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Threshold | 50 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % | ||||||||||||
Below Threshold | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % |
32 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
Degree of Performance Attainment | Adjusted EPS | Adjusted Net Revenue Plus Network Fees Weighted 33% | Adjusted Operating Margin Weighted 33% | Total Opportunity | ||||||||||||||||
Maximum | 200 | % | 200 | % | 200 | % | 200 | % | ||||||||||||
Target | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Threshold | 50 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % |
The following table sets forth the range of goals, adjusted for the 2016 fiscal transition periodimpact of the merger with TSYS, for the performance measures for 2019, our actual performance results for the 2016 fiscal transitionsuch period and the resulting payouts.
Performance / Payout | Adjusted EPS | Adjusted Net Revenue (millions) | Adjusted Operating Margin | Adjusted EPS | Adjusted Net Revenue Plus Network Fees (millions) | Adjusted Operating Margin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance thresholds: |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum | $ | 2.13 | $ | 2,186 | 30.30 | % | $ | 6.25 | $ | 5,793 | 32.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Target | $ | 1.94 | $ | 1,901 | 29.30 | % | $ | 5.95 | $ | 5,679 | 31.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Threshold | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1,616 | 28.30 | % | $ | 5.65 | $ | 5,565 | 31.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Below Threshold | $ | <1.75 | $ | <1,616 | <28.30 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual TP 2016 performance | $ | 2.02 | $ | 1,914 | 29.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual 2019 performance | $ | 6.23 | $ | 5,644 | 32.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual payout | 140 | % | 105 | % | 95 | % | 195% | 85% | 200 | % |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 45
Payouts for 2016 Fiscal Transition Period Short-Term Incentive Plan
The following table summarizes the final performanceshort-term incentive plan payouts for each named executive officerNEO based on 2016 fiscal transition period performance in 2019 for each performance metric and in total:
Name | Adjusted EPS | Adjusted Net Revenue | Adjusted Operating | Total Payout | Percentage of Target | Adjusted EPS | Adjusted Net Revenue Plus Network Fees | Adjusted Operating Margin | Total Payout(1) | Payout | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 435,556 | $ | 326,667 | $ | 295,556 | $ | 1,057,778 | 113 | % | $ | 1,040,000 | $ | 453,333 | $ | 1,066,667 | $ | 2,560,000 | 160 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 163,333 | $ | 122,500 | $ | 110,833 | $ | 396,667 | 113 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 134,750 | $ | 101,063 | $ | 91,438 | $ | 327,250 | 113 | % | $ | 452,494 | $ | 197,241 | $ | 464,097 | $ | 1,113,832 | 160 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | $ | 128,422 | $ | 55,979 | $ | 131,715 | $ | 316,116 | 160 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 115,150 | $ | 86,363 | $ | 78,138 | $ | 279,650 | 113 | % | $ | 345,542 | $ | 150,621 | $ | 354,402 | $ | 850,565 | 160 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 100,654 | $ | 75,491 | $ | 68,301 | $ | 244,446 | 113 | % | $ | 314,718 | $ | 137,185 | $ | 322,787 | $ | 774,690 | 160 | % |
(1) | Messrs. Bready and Green and Dr. Sacchi’s short-term incentive payout for 2019 was prorated accordingly based on the change in bonus targets in September 2019. Mr. Todd joined the Company on September 18, 2019, and his short-term incentive payout for 2019 was prorated accordingly. |
Each year, we grant long-term incentive awards, which we refer to as LTIs, to executivesour NEOs and other key employees throughout the Company. All LTI grants are made pursuant to our 2011 Amended and Restated Incentive Plan, or the 2011 Incentive Plan, which was last approved by our shareholders at our 2016 annual shareholders meeting. All grants of LTIs to our named executive officersNEOs were approved by the Compensation Committee and are based on target values consistent with the executives’ skills,each NEO’s responsibilities, experience and performance in relationrelative to comparable positions in the marketplace. LTIs align the executives’NEOs’ interests with those of the shareholders by linking their compensation to our share price.
In determining the LTI awards for each named executive officer,NEO, the Compensation Committee considered the market data for LTI awards and target total direct compensation opportunityopportunities for comparable positions within our peer group as of February 2019, as reflected in the FWC report, the Compensation Committee’s general assessment of the Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Executive Officer’s assessment and recommendations with respect to the other named executive officers.NEOs. The Compensation Committee does not use a specific formula for evaluating the individual performance of each named executive officer.NEO. The Compensation Committee makes each assessment taking into consideration the quality and effectiveness of each named executive officer’sNEO’s leadership and their respective contribution to the Company’s financial and operational success, as well as the totality of the executive’s performance.
The grant value of the February 2019 LTI awards for our NEOs is reflected in the following table (at target):
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 33
The annualized LTI grants for our named executive officers represent pay opportunity for performance at target:
Name | Performance Units* | Stock Options* | Restricted Stock* | Total* | Performance Units | Stock Options | Restricted Stock | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 2,750,000 | $ | 1,375,000 | $ | 1,375,000 | $ | 5,500,000 | $ | 5,500,000 | $ | 2,750,000 | $ | 2,750,000 | $ | 11,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 900,000 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 1,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 727,500 | $ | 363,750 | $ | 363,750 | $ | 1,455,000 | $ | 1,625,000 | $ | 812,500 | $ | 812,500 | $ | 3,250,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd(1) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 478,500 | $ | 239,250 | $ | 239,250 | $ | 957,000 | $ | 875,000 | $ | 437,500 | $ | 437,500 | $ | 1,750,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 422,500 | $ | 211,250 | $ | 211,250 | $ | 845,000 | $ | 662,500 | $ | 331,250 | $ | 331,250 | $ | 1,325,000 |
Mr. Todd was appointed as the Company’s Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on September 18, 2019 and did not receive an LTI |
Approximately half of the grant value of LTIs granted to the executives for the 2016 fiscal transition period wereour NEOs in February 2019 was in the form of performance units (expressed at target), approximately 25% werewas in the form of stock options, and approximately 25% werewas in the form of time-based restricted shares of common stock. The LTI mix for the 2016 fiscal transition period was the same as for fiscal 2016. In determining the appropriate mix of LTIs, the Compensation Committee took into account competitive market practices of peer group companies, its belief that a blend of equity awards provides both an incentive and retention effect, and its belief that the utilization of the various LTI awards mitigates compensation risk that may be associated with the use of a single LTI vehicle.
46 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Performance Units
In the 2016 fiscal transition period,February 2019, our Compensation Committee allocatedgranted approximately 50% of the grant value of the targettotal 2019 LTI awards to our NEOs in performance units. The performance units granted to the named executive officersour NEOs in the 2016 fiscal transition period2019 are earned based on the growth of our annual adjusted EPS, over aas modified at the end of the three-year performance period (June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2019). by the TSR modifier. The maximum possible payout is four times the target number of the performance units. The minimum payout is zero.
At the beginning of the performance period, both the threshold, target and maximum annual adjusted EPS growth rates and the TSR modifier are set by the Compensation Committee for the entire three-year performance period. The threshold, target and maximum adjusted EPS growth goal for each of the three years in the performance period is determined as a percentage increase or decrease over the actual results from the prior fiscal year, assuming constant currencies.
At the end of the performance period, the adjusted EPS growth performance for each year (calculated separately based on actual adjusted EPS from the preceding year) is evaluated and the calculated payout percentage (0% to 200% of target) is certified by the Compensation Committee. The final payout percentage (as a percentage of target) is determined as the average of each of the three annual payout percentages. As a result, payouts for the second and third year of the performance period require continuedsustained growth over a long-termthe three-year period. Because growth rates are calculated separately for each year in the performance period and are not aggregated over the three-year performance period, the plan allows for a long-term growth goal while recalibrating to actual performance on an annual basis.
The earnedTSR modifier is determined based on the Company’s total shareholder return performance rank relative to the S&P 500 index over the entire three-year performance period. The payout percentage from the achievement of the adjusted EPS growth rates, as determined above, is then modified up or down by the TSR modifier, to obtain a final payout percentage. This design rewards our NEOs for strong relative total shareholder return performance.
Earned performance units will convert into unrestricted shares onfollowing the third anniversary of the performance unit grant date, provided that the Compensation Committee has previously certified the performance results described above. As a result, there is no payout of the award until the end of the three-year performance period.
The following table summarizes the grant value and target number of performance units to each of the NEOs in 2019:
Name | Target Allocation to Performance Units | Number of Performance Units Granted(1) | ||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 5,500,000 | 42,896 | |||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 1,625,000 | 12,674 | |||||||
Paul M. Todd(2) | — | — | ||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 875,000 | 6,825 | |||||||
David L. Green | $ | 662,500 | 5,167 |
(1) | The number of units was calculated by taking the target value divided by our share price on the grant date ($128.22). |
(2) | Mr. Todd did not join the Company until September 18, 2019, and thus did not receive a performance unit grant for 2019. |
34 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 47
The following table summarizesPayout of 2017 Fiscal Year Performance Units
In each year of the most recently completed three-year performance period beginning January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2019, the Company achieved adjusted EPS growth at or above the maximum level, as calculated pursuant to the terms of the 2017 fiscal year awards. As a result, the 2017 fiscal year performance units based on financial performance metricswere earned at 200% of target, granted during the 2016 fiscal transition period:as follows:
Name | Annualized Target Allocation to | Annualized Number of | Actual Number of Performance Units Granted(3) | Shares Earned at End of Performance Period | Value at Vesting(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 2,750,000 | 36,834 | 21,487 | 75,520 | $ | 13,786,931 | ||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 900,000 | 12,055 | 7,032 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 727,500 | 9,745 | 5,685 | 19,396 | $ | 3,540,934 | ||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 478,500 | 6,410 | 3,739 | 12,752 | $ | 2,328,005 | ||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 422,500 | 5,659 | 3,302 | 11,228 | $ | 2,049,784 |
(1) | Reflects |
Stock Options
In the 2016 fiscal transition period,February 2019, our Compensation Committee allocatedgranted approximately 25% of the target 2019 LTI value of the target LTI awards toin stock options. Our Compensation Committee believes stock options provide a strong incentive for creation of long-term shareholder value, as stock options may be exercised for a profit only to the extent the price of the Company’s stock appreciates after the grant date. The exercise price is the closing price of the stock on the grant date. We do not grant discounted options orre-price previously granted options. The stock options vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the executive’s continued employment with us on each vesting date. During the 2016 transition period,2019, the Compensation Committee approved the following stock option grants for each ofto the named executive officers:NEOs:
Name | Annualized Target Allocation to Stock Options(1) | Annualized Number of Stock Options(2) | Actual Number of Stock Options Granted(3) | Target Allocation to Stock Options | Number of Stock Options Granted(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 1,375,000 | 62,872 | 36,676 | $ | 2,750,000 | 69,445 | ||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 450,000 | 20,577 | 12,003 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 363,750 | 16,633 | 9,703 | $ | 812,500 | 20,518 | ||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd(2) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 239,250 | 10,940 | 6,382 | $ | 437,500 | 11,048 | ||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 211,250 | 9,660 | 5,635 | $ | 331,250 | 8,365 |
(1) |
Calculated based on the closing price of our stock on the grant date and the Black-Scholes |
(2) | Mr. Todd did not join the Company until September 18, 2019, and thus did not receive a stock option grant for 2019. |
Time-Based Restricted Stock
In the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, our Compensation Committee allocatedgranted approximately 25% of the total 2019 LTI value of target LTI awards toin time-based restricted stock. Our Compensation Committee believes restricted stock provides a retentive element to the long-term incentive program while still maintaining alignment with the long-term interests of our shareholders by tying the value of the awards to the value of our stockshare price. The restricted shares vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the executive’s continued employment with us on each vesting date.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 35
Our named executive officers received the following number of restricted shares as part of the compensation plan for the 2016 fiscal transition period:
Name | Annualized Target Allocation to Restricted Stock(1) | Annualized Number of Restricted Shares(2) | Actual Number of Restricted Shares Granted(3) | ||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 1,375,000 | 18,417 | 10,744 | |||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 450,000 | 6,028 | 3,516 | |||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 363,750 | 4,873 | 2,843 | |||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 239,250 | 3,205 | 1,870 | |||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 211,250 | 2,830 | 1,651 |
Synergy Incentive Program
Acquisitions have been and remain a key component of our strategy. In April 2016, we completed our merger with Heartland. Unlike our previous acquisitions, our merger with Heartland has been and we believe will continue to be transformative for our Company. The purchase price of approximately $3.9 billion exceeds all of our prior acquisitions in recent history combined. We have generated and intend to continue to generate substantial synergies by fully integrating Heartland’s operations into ours.
Aligning the synergy initiatives of the Heartland merger to the compensation of our key personnel, including our executive management team, will drive the achievement of the initiatives which, in turn, are intended to increase the accretive nature of the transaction and create enterprise value to our shareholders. Accordingly, during the 2016 fiscal transition period our Compensation Committee approved all of the material terms and conditions of a synergy incentive program designed to incentivize our executives to maximize synergies relating to the Heartland transaction and granted the synergy performance units. Under the synergy incentive program, certain eligible employees, including each of our named executive officers, have an opportunity to earn cash and shares of our stock, subject to a maximum limit, based upon the achievement between April 22, 2016 (the closing date for the Heartland transaction) and August 31, 2018 of pre-established synergy goals established by our Compensation Committee.
The following chart summarizes the target and maximum award opportunities pursuant to the synergy incentive program for each of our named executive officers.
Name | Target | Maximum | ||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 2,200,000 | $ | 3,800,000 | ||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 1,800,000 | $ | 3,200,000 | ||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 2,800,000 | ||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 1,300,000 | $ | 2,400,000 | ||||||
David L. Green | $ | 500,000 | $ | 700,000 |
3648 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement
The Compensation Committee allocated 50% of the maximum award opportunity to cash and 50% to performance units, as described inOur NEOs received the following table.number of restricted shares in 2019:
Name | Maximum Allocation to Cash Award | Maximum Allocation to | Actual Number of Synergy Units Granted(1) | Target Allocation to Restricted Shares | Number of Restricted Shares Granted(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 1,900,000 | $ | 1,900,000 | 25,924 | $ | 2,750,000 | 21,488 | |||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 1,600,000 | $ | 1,600,000 | 21,831 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 1,400,000 | $ | 1,400,000 | 19,102 | $ | 812,500 | 6,337 | |||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd(2) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 1,200,000 | $ | 1,200,000 | 16,373 | $ | 437,500 | 3,413 | |||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 350,000 | $ | 350,000 | 4,776 | $ | 331,250 | 2,584 |
(1) | The number of shares was calculated by dividing the target dollar value by the share price as |
Depending on the Compensation Committee’s certification of the achievement of the synergy goals for the period beginning on April 22, 2016 and ending on August 31, 2018, as presented by an independent accounting firm, each of the named executive officers may earn an award up to the maximum award set forth above, subject to our Compensation Committee’s negative discretion to pay a lesser amount based upon the achievement of the synergy goals. Achievement of synergies below target will result in zero payout. Achievement between target and maximum will result in a payout interpolated between the target and maximum payouts. No incentive is paid for synergies above the maximum goal. Our Compensation Committee has the final authority to determine whether a specific item qualifies as cost savings under the synergy incentive program. The cash portion, to the extent earned, will be paid out in the pay period immediately following August 31, 2018, subject to the executive’s continued employment with us on such date. Half of any earned performance units will convert into unrestricted shares on August 31, 2018, and the remaining units will convert to unrestricted shares on August 31, 2019, subject to the executive’s continued employment with us on each respective date.
(2) | Mr. Todd did not join the Company until September 18, 2019, and thus did not receive a restricted stock grant for 2019. |
Our namedOther perquisites are provided to help our NEOs be more productive and efficient and as a competitive compensation measure. They are limited in amount and the Company maintains a strict policy regarding the eligibility and use of these benefits, which include financial planning, access to an executive officershealth program and personal use of the Company airplane. Annual NEO personal use of the plane is capped at 50 hours of flight time for the Chief Executive Officer, 25 hours of flight time for the President and Chief Operating Officer, and 15 hours for all other NEOs. To the extent an NEO or other employee uses the Company’s plane for personal travel without reimbursement to the Company, they are eligible to participate in other health and welfare programsimputed compensation for tax purposes based on the Standard Industry Fare Level rates that are available to substantially all full-time salaried employees, including our 401(k) plan.published by the IRS.
Perquisites offered to our named executive officers on an annual basis are limited to financial planning. These items create taxable income to the executive, which we do not gross up. In addition, we may ask named executive officersour NEOs and some of their spouses to participate in President’s Club trips offered as rewards to certain other employees for excellent sales or other performance. We treat the expenses of spouses as taxable income to the executives. Because spousal participation is at our request and can be disruptive to other plans they may have, we provide a gross up on that taxable income.
Our named executive officersNEOs are also eligible to participate in ournon-qualified deferred compensation plan, pursuant to which they may elect to defer up to 100% of their base salary and other eligible forms of compensation. We do not make contributions to the deferred compensation plan. In the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, none of our named executive officersNEOs made any contributions to or withdrawals from the deferred compensation plan. In 2019, we added a 401(k) restoration program to ournon-qualified deferred compensation plan, in which, the employee will continue to receive company match once they have reached the IRS income limit and are contributing on average annually 5% to the 401(k) plan. For 2019, the Company match has a three-year cliff vesting restriction. See “Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Officers —Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan” on page 4758 for more detail regarding the plan.
We are party to an employment agreement with alleach of our named executive officers.NEOs. These employment agreements provide benefits to our Company and,that, we believe, are necessary in order to attract and retainhighly-qualified executives. Each named executive officer who is a party to an employment agreementNEO has agreed not to disclose confidential information or compete with us, and not to solicit our customers or recruit our employees, for a period of generally 24 months following the termination of his or her employment. In exchange, we offer limited income and benefit protections to the executive,NEO, but we do not provide for any excise taxgross-ups. All of our employment agreements with named executive officers contain a term.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement – 3749
Policy Regarding Timing of Equity Grants
Our Compensation Committee, in its discretion, typically makes the annual grant to all eligible employees as soon as practicableshortly after (but no earlier than) the first business day followingpublic disclosure of either the issuance of ourCompany’s fourth quarter earnings release foror the fourth quarterfiling of our preceding fiscal yearthe Company’s annual report, based upon the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, or in the event no earnings release is issued, as soon as practicable after (but not earlier than) the first business day following the Company’s filing of its annual report. Our Compensation Committee fromdate. From time to time, our Compensation Committee may approve supplemental or othernon-recurring grants outside of our annual compensation program at any other time.program.
Anti-Hedging Policy
Our insider trading policy prohibits directors and employees from engaging in any transaction in which they profit if the value of our common stock declines.
Target Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Compensation Committee has implemented updated stock ownership guidelines for our executives. This fostersNEOs and other members of senior management to foster equity ownership and alignsalign the interests of our executivesmanagement team, including our NEOs, with our shareholders. WithinMore specifically, within five years of the executive’shis or her initial appointment to his or herthe position, our Chief Executive Officerthe executive is expected to beneficially own aat least the number of shares at leastas follows:
For the Chief Executive Officer: equal to 500%600% of his or her base salary,salary;
For the President: equal to 400% of his or her base salary;
For the Chief Financial Officer and all other executives are expectedNEOs: equal to beneficially own a number300% of shares at leasthis or her base salary; and
For other members of senior management: equal to 200% - 300% of theirhis or her base salary.
Additionally, each executiveNEO is required to hold his or her stock or other securitiessuch shares until the executiveNEO has met the applicable ownership guideline. Each of our executive officersNEOs was in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines as of the record date.
Clawback Policy
The Compensation Committee has adopted a clawback policy, pursuant to which we may recoup all or any portion of the value of any annual or long-term incentive awards provided to any current or former executive officersNEOs in the event that our financial statements are restated due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws.
Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that we may deduct in any one year with respect to any one of our named executive officers (other than our Chief Financial Officer). However,NEOs. Prior to enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Jobs Act”), qualifying “performance-based” compensation willwas not be subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements arewere met. The 2011 Incentive Plan is designed to allow
However, the Compensation Committee to grant awards that may qualify for the performance-based compensation exemption from Section 162(m),’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation was repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such as the performance-based restricted stock units and synergy incentive awards granted in the 2016 fiscal transition period. Our short-term incentive plan, as a subplan of the 2011 Incentive Plan, also allows annual cash incentive awards that may qualify as performance-based compensation. Under the 2011 Incentive Plan, the minimum threshold performance goal thatcompensation paid to our Compensation Committee sets for each plan year is the achievement of positive operating income, as reflected in our consolidated statements of income and filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for such fiscal year, which we refer to as “threshold operating income performance.” No bonuses will be payable under the short-term incentive plan unless we achieve threshold operating income performance. In any year that our Company achieves threshold operating income performance, our Chief Executive Officer’s maximum award is 2% of such operating income and each other named executive officer’s maximum award is 1% of such operating income (but in no eventNEOs in excess of $10,000,000 per participant).$1 million will not be deductible. The Compensation Committee then uses negative discretionJobs Act provides for transition relief applicable to pay a lesser amount. To guide itcertain arrangements in exercising such discretion,place as of November 2, 2017. The scope of the Compensation Committee establishes intermediate performance metrics and their respective weightings, and intermediate award opportunity ranges, as it deems appropriate to encourage and reward particular areas of performance.
38 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
A number of requirements must be met for particular compensation to qualifytransition relief under the legislation repealing Section 162(m),’s exemption from the deduction limit is uncertain, so there can be no assurance that any compensation awarded will be fully deductible under all circumstances. Also, to maintain flexibility in compensating our executives,NEOs, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to use its judgment to authorize compensation payments that may be subject to the deduction limit when the Compensation Committee believes that such payments are appropriate.
50 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Report of Compensation Committee Members
The members of the Compensation Committee at the time the compensation of our named executive officers for the 2016 transition period was approved have reviewed and discussed the foregoing section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based on such review and discussion, thesethe Compensation Committee members recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement, which is to be incorporated by reference into the Company’s TransitionAnnual Report on Form10-K for the 2016 fiscal transition period.2019.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Mitchell L. HollinJohn G. Bruno (Chair)
Kris Cloninger III
William I Jacobs
JohnJoia M. Partridge
John G. Bruno
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement – 3951
Compensation of Named Executive Officers
The following table presents certain summary information concerning compensation that we paid or accrued for services rendered in all capacities during the 2016 fiscal transition period (referred to in the tables below as “TP 2016”)2019, 2018, and for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.2017.
Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($)(2) | Stock Awards ($)(3)(5) | Option Awards ($)(4)(5) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(5) | All Other Compensation ($)(6) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan Chief Executive Officer | TP 2016 | $ | 583,333 | (1) | $ | 3,506,376 | $ | 802,104 | $ | 1,057,778 | $ | 28,149 | $ | 5,977,740 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | $ | 1,000,000 | — | $ | 3,375,219 | $ | 1,110,782 | $ | 2,710,000 | $ | 41,401 | $ | 8,237,403 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | $ | 900,000 | — | $ | 6,045,511 | $ | 1,120,533 | $ | 2,106,324 | $ | 33,179 | $ | 10,205,547 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | $ | 739,333 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 3,825,841 | — | $ | 1,103,390 | $ | 41,943 | $ | 6,060,507 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum President and Chief Operating Officer | TP 2016 | $ | 350,000 | (1) | $ | 1,687,515 | $ | 262,506 | $ | 396,667 | $ | 28,424 | $ | 2,725,111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | $ | 585,000 | — | $ | 1,162,577 | $ | 382,606 | $ | 1,056,900 | $ | 35,111 | $ | 3,222,194 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | $ | 575,000 | — | $ | 2,252,574 | $ | 385,970 | $ | 996,820 | $ | 29,205 | $ | 4,239,569 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | $ | 530,000 | $ | 315,000 | $ | 1,293,079 | — | $ | 569,607 | $ | 27,600 | $ | 2,735,286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | TP 2016 | $ | 320,833 | (1) | $ | 1,386,677 | $ | 212,205 | $ | 327,250 | $ | 29,973 | $ | 2,276,938 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2016 | $ | 530,000 | — | $ | 937,667 | $ | 308,568 | $ | 861,780 | $ | 35,715 | $ | 2,673,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | $ | 458,904 | — | $ | 3,715,644 | $ | 311,266 | $ | 736,780 | $ | 281,974 | $ | 5,504,568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | TP 2016 | $ | 274,167 | (1) | $ | 1,068,777 | $ | 139,574 | $ | 279,650 | $ | 13,907 | $ | 1,776,075 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EVP and Chief Information Officer | 2016 | $ | 470,000 | — | $ | 600,133 | $ | 197,496 | $ | 721,763 | $ | 29,253 | $ | 2,018,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | $ | 375,000 | — | $ | 1,049,899 | $ | 174,322 | $ | 390,060 | $ | 28,400 | $ | 2,017,681 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | $ | 350,200 | — | $ | 505,981 | — | $ | 212,428 | $ | 21,859 | $ | 1,090,468 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | TP 2016 | $ | 253,750 | (1) | $ | 619,783 | 123,237 | $ | 244,446 | $ | 10,538 | $ | 1,251,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | 2016 | $ | 400,000 | — | $ | 562,667 | $ | 185,141 | $ | 578,133 | $ | 35,682 | $ | 1,761,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | $ | 320,000 | — | $ | 799,549 | $ | 130,745 | $ | 277,376 | $ | 27,543 | $ | 1,555,213 |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary(1) | Stock Awards(2) | Option Awards(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(4) | All Other Compensation(5) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan |
| 2019 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 14,045,285 | $ | 2,750,022 | $ | 2,560,000 | $ | 146,789 | $ | 20,502,096 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2018 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 9,950,022 | $ | 1,875,034 | $ | 3,958,667 | $ | 34,837 | $ | 16,818,560 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 4,500,048 | $ | 1,500,010 | $ | 2,101,333 | $ | 34,392 | $ | 9,135,783 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready |
| 2019 | $ | 623,269 | $ | 6,820,333 | $ | 812,513 | $ | 1,113,832 | $ | 75,859 | $ | 9,445,796 | |||||||||||||||||||||
President and Chief Operating Officer | 2018 | $ | 585,000 | $ | 2,494,011 | $ | 457,503 | $ | 2,152,700 | $ | 34,063 | $ | 5,723,277 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | $ | 565,000 | $ | 1,155,759 | $ | 385,274 | $ | 667,830 | $ | 29,328 | $ | 2,803,191 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd |
| 2019 | $ | 188,164 | $ | 2,000,140 |
| — | $ | 316,116 | $ | 60,844 | $ | 2,565,264 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Senior EVP and Chief Financial Officer | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi |
| 2019 | $ | 531,154 | $ | 3,518,903 | $ | 437,501 | $ | 850,565 | $ | 67,761 | $ | 5,405,884 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Senior EVP and Chief Information Officer | 2018 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 1,454,151 | $ | 350,023 | $ | 1,811,167 | $ | 30,517 | $ | 4,145,858 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | $ | 485,000 | $ | 759,860 | $ | 253,258 | $ | 573,270 | $ | 29,328 | $ | 2,100,716 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green |
| 2019 | $ | 520,769 | $ | 3,149,964 | $ | 331,254 | $ | 774,690 | $ | 63,913 | $ | 4,840,590 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Senior EVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | 2018 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 1,121,258 | $ | 275,000 | $ | 929,000 | $ | 30,517 | $ | 2,855,775 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 669,048 | $ | 223,018 | $ | 502,350 | $ | 28,760 | $ | 1,873,176 |
(1) | The increases to base salary |
(2) |
This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of time-based restricted shares of our common stock and awards of |
Grant Date | Performance Period End Date | Expected Term (years) | Expected Volatility | Risk-Free Interest Rate | Expected Dividend Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 |
|
12/31/2021 |
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
23.64 |
% |
|
2.47 |
% |
|
0 |
% |
The Company used its historical share prices as the basis for the volatility assumptions. The risk-free interest rates were based on U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of grant. The expected term was based on the time remaining in the performance period on the grant date.
52 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
The tables below set forth the maximum grant date fair value, assuming that the highest levels of performance conditions were achieved, for all performance-based awards granted during the 2016 fiscal transition period, fiscal 2016, fiscal 20152019, 2018 and fiscal 2014,2017, for which an amount less than the maximum is reflected in the table above, assuming that the highest levels of performance conditions were achieved.above.
2016 Fiscal Transition Period Performance Units | 2016 Fiscal Transition Period Synergy Units | |||||||||||||||||||
Name | Performance Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Performance Value | Synergy Grant Date | Synergy Value | ||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 1,604,219 | $ | 3,208,438 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 1,900,000 | ||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 525,009 | $ | 1,050,018 | $ | 900,000 | $ | 1,600,000 | ||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 424,442 | $ | 848,884 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 1,400,000 | ||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 279,154 | $ | 558,308 | $ | 650,000 | $ | 1,200,000 | ||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 246,527 | $ | 493,054 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 350,000 |
2019 Performance Units | 2019 Synergy Performance Units | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Value Assuming Highest Performance | Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Value Assuming Highest Performance | ||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 6,795,155 | $ | 27,180,621 | $ | 4,500,067 | $ | 9,000,135 | ||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 2,007,688 | $ | 8,030,753 | $ | 4,000,115 | $ | 12,000,344 | ||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | — | — | $ | 2,000,140 | $ | 6,000,419 | ||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 1,081,148 | $ | 4,324,593 | $ | 2,000,140 | $ | 6,000,419 | ||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 818,504 | $ | 3,274,018 | $ | 2,000,140 | $ | 6,000,419 |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 40
Fiscal 2016 Performance Units | 2018 Performance Units | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Value Assuming Highest Performance | Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Value Assuming Highest Performance | ||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 2,250,000 | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 4,575,002 | $ | 18,300,009 | ||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 775,000 | $ | 1,550,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 625,000 | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,116,393 | $ | 4,465,574 | ||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 400,000 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 854,017 | $ | 3,416,069 | ||||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 375,000 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 671,123 | $ | 2,684,494 |
Fiscal 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Units | LPUs | |||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Value Assuming Highest Performance | Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Value Assuming Highest Performance(a) | ||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 2,250,000 | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 2,484,510 | $ | 18,522,000 | ||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 775,000 | $ | 1,550,000 | $ | 1,014,141 | $ | 7,560,000 | ||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 625,000 | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 816,922 | $ | 6,090,000 | ||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 350,000 | $ | 700,000 | $ | 488,323 | $ | 3,640,000 | ||||||||||||
David L. Green | $ | 262,500 | $ | 525,000 | $ | 377,491 | $ | 2,814,000 |
Fiscal 2014 Performance Units | 2017 Performance Units | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Value Assuming Highest Performance | Grant Date Fair Value at Target | Value Assuming Highest Performance | ||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 3,825,841 | $ | 7,651,682 | $ | 3,000,032 | $ | 6,000,064 | ||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 1,293,079 | $ | 2,586,159 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | (b | ) | (b | ) | $ | 770,506 | $ | 1,541,012 | ||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 505,981 | $ | 1,011,963 | $ | 506,573 | $ | 1,013,146 | ||||||||||||||
David L. Green | (b | ) | (b | ) | $ | 446,032 | $ | 892,064 |
This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. |
(4) | This column reflects cash payouts under our short-term incentive plan. For 2018, this column also includes (i) cash payouts under our short-term incentive plan and (ii) the synergy cash bonus payout granted to our NEOs in the 2016 fiscal year in connection with the Heartland acquisition. |
(5) |
41 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
This column includes the following compensation components for |
Name | Company Contributions to 401(k) Plans | Financial Planning Services | Other Perquisites and Personal Benefits(a) | Total | Company Contributions to 401(K) Plans | Company Contributions to Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan | Financial Planning Services | Other Perquisites and Personal Benefits(a) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | — | $ | 13,073 | $ | 15,076 | $ | 28,149 | $ | 11,200 | $ | 111,147 | $ | 22,280 | $ | 2,162 | $ | 146,789 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | $ | 1,600 | $ | 10,538 | $ | 16,286 | $ | 28,424 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | $ | 2,446 | $ | 10,538 | $ | 16,989 | $ | 29,973 | $ | 11,200 | $ | 43,839 | $ | 17,960 | $ | 2,850 | $ | 75,849 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | — | $ | 58,584 | — | $ | 2,260 | $ | 60,844 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | $ | 3,369 | $ | 10,538 | — | $ | 13,907 | $ | 11,200 | $ | 34,493 | $ | 17,960 | $ | 4,180 | $ | 67,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | — | $ | 10,538 | — | $ | 10,538 | $ | 11,200 | $ | 32,791 | $ | 17,960 | $ | 1,962 | $ | 63,913 |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 53
(a) | These perquisites and personal benefits consist of compensation related to |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in the 2016 Fiscal Transition Period2019
The following table sets forth information concerning grants of plan-based awards during 2019 to the 2016 fiscal transition period to our named executive officers,NEOs, all of which were made pursuant to our 2011 Incentive Plan.
Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(3) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(4) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(5) | Estimated Future Payouts UnderNon-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
Estimated Future Payouts | All Other
| All Other (#)(4)
| Exercise
| Grant Date Option
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Max ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Max (#) | Grant
| Threshold ($)
| Target ($)
| Max ($)
| Threshold (#)
| Target (#)
| Max (#)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | 7/29/16 | $ | 291,667 | $ | 583,333 | $ | 1,166,666 | 2/25/2019 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 1,600,000 | $ | 3,200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy cash | 6/08/16 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 1,900,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 7/29/16 | 10,744 | 21,487 | 42,974 | $ | 1,604,219 | 2/25/2019 | 10,724 | 42,896 | 171,584 | $ | 6,795,155 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy units | 6/08/16 | 15,009 | 25,924 | $ | 1,100,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted shares | 7/29/16 | 10,744 | $ | 802,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options | 7/29/16 | 36,676 | $ | 74.66 | $ | 802,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | 7/29/16 | $ | 175,000 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 700,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy cash | 6/08/16 | $ | 900,000 | $ | 1,600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 7/29/16 | 3,516 | 7,032 | 14,064 | $ | 525,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy units | 6/08/16 | 12,280 | 21,831 | $ | 900,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy performance units | 9/18/2019 | — | 27,381 | 54,762 | $ | 4,500,067 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted shares | 7/29/16 | 3,516 | $ | 262,505 | 2/25/2019 | 21,488 | $ | 2,750,063 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options | 7/29/16 | 12,003 | $ | 74.66 | $ | 262,506 | 2/25/2019 | 69,455 | $ | 128.22 | $ | 2,750,022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | 7/29/16 | $ | 144,375 | $ | 288,750 | $ | 577,750 | 9/22/2019 | $ | 402,500 | $ | 805,000 | $ | 1,610,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy cash | 6/08/16 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 1,400,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 7/29/16 | 2,843 | 5,685 | 11,370 | $ | 424,442 | 2/25/2019 | 3,169 | 12,674 | 50,696 | $ | 2,007,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy units | 6/08/16 | 10,233 | 19,102 | $ | 749,977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy performance units | 9/18/2019 | — | 24,339 | 73,017 | $ | 4,000,115 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted shares | 7/29/16 | 2,843 | $ | 212,258 | 2/25/2019 | 6,337 | $ | 812,530 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options | 7/29/16 | 9,703 | $ | 74.66 | $ | 212,205 | 2/25/2019 | 20,518 | $ | 128.22 | $ | 812,513 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd(6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | 9/22/2019 | $ | 357,000 | $ | 714,000 | $ | 1,428,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy performance units | 9/18/2019 | — | 12,170 | 36,510 | $ | 2,000,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi |
| — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | 7/29/16 | $ | 123,375 | $ | 246,750 | $ | 493,500 | 9/22/2019 | $ | 287,500 | $ | 575,000 | $ | 1,150,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy cash | 6/08/16 | $ | 650,000 | $ | 1,200 000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 7/29/16 | 1,870 | 3,739 | 7,478 | $ | 279,154 | 2/25/2019 | 1,706 | 6,825 | 27,300 | $ | 1,081,148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy units | 6/08/16 | 8,869 | 16,373 | $ | 650,009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy performance units | 9/18/2019 | — | 12,170 | 36,510 | $ | 2,000,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted shares | 7/29/16 | 1,870 | $ | 139,614 | 2/25/2019 | 3,413 | $ | 437,615 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options | 7/29/16 | 6,382 | $ | 74.66 | $ | 139,574 | 2/25/2019 | 11,048 | $ | 128.22 | $ | 437,501 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | 7/29/16 | $ | 107,844 | $ | 215,688 | $ | 431,375 | 9/22/2019 | $ | 275,000 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy cash | 6/08/16 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 350,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 7/29/16 | 1,651 | 3,302 | 6,604 | $ | 246,527 | 2/25/2019 | 1,292 | 5,167 | 20,668 | $ | 818,504 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy units | 6/08/16 | 3,411 | 4,776 | $ | 249,992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synergy performance units | 9/18/2019 | — | 12,170 | 36,510 | $ | 2,000,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted shares | 7/29/16 | 1,651 | $ | 123,264 | 2/25/2019 | 2,584 | $ | 331,320 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options | 7/29/16 | 5,635 | $ | 74.66 | $ | 123,237 | 2/25/2019 | 8,365 | $ | 128.22 | $ | 331,254 |
(1) | These columns reflect the threshold, target and maximum annual cash incentive opportunities under our short-term incentive plan |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 42
(2) | These columns reflect the |
54 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
For purposes of the performance units granted in 2019, after a three-year performance period, our Compensation Committee will certify the results and determine the number of performance units that have been earned. Thereafter, all of the performance units will convert to unrestricted shares.
Depending on the Compensation Committee’s certification of the achievement of the synergy goals as presented by an independent accounting firm, each of the named executive officers may earn an award up to the maximum award set forth above, subject to our Compensation Committee’s negative discretion to pay a lesser amount based upon the achievementhalf of the synergy goals. The cash portion,performance units will convert into unrestricted shares on September 18, 2022, and the remaining units will convert to unrestricted shares on September 18, 2023, subject to the extent earned, will beNEO’s continued employment with the Company on each respective date.
The NEOs do not have the right to vote the underlying shares, and dividends are not payable or otherwise accrued to the NEOs until the units are converted into a stock grant at the end of the applicable performance period. Once the stock grant is made, dividends are paid out inon such stock at the pay period immediately following August 31, 2018.same rate as all of our other shareholders.
(3) | This column reflects the number of restricted shares of our common stock granted in |
(4) | This column represents the number of stock options |
(5) | This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted in |
(6) | Mr. Todd was appointed as the Company’s Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on September 18, 2019 and did not participate in the February 2019 grant of LTI awards. |
43 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 55
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20162019
The following table provides the outstanding equity awards at December 31, 20162019 for each of our named executive officers.the NEOs.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable(1) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(1) | Option ($/sh) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | 6/1/10 | 50,000 | — | $ | 20.72 | 6/1/20 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | 88,458 | 44,228 | $ | 35.78 | 8/18/24 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | 23,734 | 47,470 | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/25 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | 36,676 | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/13 | — | — | — | — | 11,288 | (3) | $ | 783,500 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10/1/13 | — | — | — | — | 15,296 | (3) | $ | 1,061,695 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | 10,482 | (4) | $ | 727,556 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | 13,414 | (4) | $ | 931,066 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | 10,744 | (4) | $ | 745,741 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 125,788 | (5) | $ | 8,730,945 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 266,850 | (6) | $ | 18,522,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 80,476 | (7) | $ | 5,585,839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/8/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25,924 | (8) | $ | 1,799,385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | 42,974 | (9) | $ | 2,982,825 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
162,192 | 128,374 | 61,224 | $ | 4,249,558 | 542,012 | $ | 37,621,053 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | 8/18/14 | 30,470 | 15,234 | $ | 35.78 | 8/18/24 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | 8,176 | 16,350 | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/25 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | 12,003 | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/13 | — | — | — | — | 9,832 | (3) | $ | 682,439 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | 3,610 | (4) | $ | 250,570 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | 4,620 | (4) | $ | 320,674 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | — | — | — | — | 3,516 | (4) | $ | 244,046 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43,328 | (5) | $ | 3,007,396 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 108,924 | (6) | $ | 7,560,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27,720 | (7) | $ | 1,924,045 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/8/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21,831 | (8) | $ | 1,515,290 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,064 | (9) | $ | 976,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38,646 | 43,587 | 21,578 | $ | 1,497,729 | 215,867 | $ | 14,983,328 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | 8/18/14 | 24,572 | 12,286 | $ | 35.78 | 8/18/24 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | 6,594 | 13,186 | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/25 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | 9,703 | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/14 | — | — | — | — | 26,081 | (3) | $ | 1,810,282 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | 2,912 | (4) | $ | 202,122 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | 3,726 | (4) | $ | 258,622 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | — | — | — | — | 2,843 | (4) | $ | 197,333 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34,944 | (5) | $ | 2,425,463 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 87,742 | (6) | $ | 6,090,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22,356 | (7) | $ | 1,551,730 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/8/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19,102 | (8) | $ | 1,325,870 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | 11,370 | (9) | $ | 789,192 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31,166 | 35,175 | 35,562 | $ | 2,468,358 | 175,514 | $ | 12,182,427 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | 8/18/14 | 6,880 | $ | 35.78 | 8/18/24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | 8,440 | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/25 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | 6,382 | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/13 | — | — | — | — | 3,848 | (3) | $ | 267,090 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | 1,630 | (4) | $ | 113,138 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | 2,386 | (4) | $ | 165,612 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | — | — | — | — | 1,870 | (4) | $ | 129,797 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19,568 | (5) | $ | 1,358,215 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 52,448 | (6) | $ | 3,640,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,308 | (7) | $ | 993,118 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/8/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16,373 | (8) | $ | 1,136,450 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7,478 | (9) | $ | 519,048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | 21,702 | 9,734 | $ | 675,637 | 110,175 | $ | 7,647,247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant/ Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable(1) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(1) | Option Exercise Price ($/sh) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | 7/30/2015 | 71,204 | — | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/2025 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/2016 | 36,676 | — | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | 42,230 | 21,115 | $ | 79.45 | 3/1/2027 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | 17,812 | 35,623 | $ | 114.70 | 2/26/2028 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | 69,445 | $ | 128.22 | 2/25/2029 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | — | — | — | — | 6,293 | (3) | $ | 1,148,850 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 10,898 | 3) | $ | 1,989,539 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/12/2018 | — | — | — | — | 19,697 | 3) | $ | 3,595,884 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | 21,488 | (3) | $ | 3,915,547 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | — | — | — | — | 75,520 | (4) | $ | 13,786,931 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 98,082 | (5) | $ | 17,905,850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 128,688 | (6) | $ | 23,493,281 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/18/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27,381 | (7) | $ | 4,998,675 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 167,922 | 126,183 | 133,856 | $ | 24,436,751 | 254,151 | $ | 46,397,806 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | 7/30/2015 | 3,780 | — | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/2025 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/2016 | 9,703 | — | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | 10,847 | 5,423 | $ | 79.45 | 3/1/2027 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | 4,346 | 8,692 | $ | 114.70 | 2/26/2028 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | 20,518 | $ | 128.22 | 2/25/2029 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | — | — | — | — | 1,616 | (3) | $ | 295,017 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 2,659 | (3) | $ | 485,427 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/12/2018 | — | — | — | — | 5,178 | (3) | $ | 945,296 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | 6,337 | (3) | $ | 1,156,883 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | — | — | — | — | 19,396 | (4) | $ | 3,540,934 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23,934 | (5) | $ | 4,369,391 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38,022 | (6) | $ | 6,941,296 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/18/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24,339 | (7) | $ | 4,443,328 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 28,676 | 34,633 | — | — | 35,186 | $ | 6,423,557 | 86,295 | $ | 15,754,015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | 9/18/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12,170 | (7) | $ | 2,221,755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido Sacchi | 7/30/2015 | 4,220 | — | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/2025 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/2016 | 6,382 | — | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | 7,130 | 3,565 | $ | 79.45 | 3/1/2027 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | 3,325 | 6,650 | $ | 114.70 | 2/26/2028 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | 11,048 | $ | 128.22 | 2/25/2029 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | — | — | — | — | 1,063 | (3) | $ | 194,061 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 2,035 | (3) | $ | 371,510 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/12/2018 | — | — | — | — | 1,407 | (3) | $ | 256,862 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | 3,413 | (3) | $ | 623,077 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | — | — | — | — | 12,752 | (4) | $ | 2,328,005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18,309 | (5) | $ | 3,342,491 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20,475 | (6) | $ | 3,737,916 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/18/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12,170 | (7) | $ | 2,221,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 21,057 | 21,263 | 20,670 | $ | 3,773,515 | 50,954 | $ | 9,302,162 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | 8/18/2014 | 15,482 | — | $ | 35.78 | 8/18/2024 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/2015 | 11,868 | — | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/2025 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/2016 | 5,635 | — | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | 6,279 | 3,139 | $ | 79.45 | 3/1/2027 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | 2,612 | 5,225 | $ | 114.70 | 2/26/2028 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | 8,365 | $ | 128.22 | 2/25/2029 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | — | — | — | — | 936 | (3) | $ | 170,876 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 1,599 | (3) | $ | 291,913 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/12/2018 | — | — | — | — | 985 | (3) | $ | 179,822 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | 2,584 | (3) | $ | 471,735 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2017 | — | — | — | — | 11,228 | (4) | $ | 2,049,784 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,388 | (5) | $ | 2,626,673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15,501 | (6) | $ | 2,829,863 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/18/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12,170 | (7) | $ | 2,221,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 41,876 | 16,729 | 17,332 | $ | 3,164,130 | 42,059 | $ | 7,678,291 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 44
Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable(1) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(1) | Option ($/sh) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | 7/29/09 | 2,198 | — | $ | 21.09 | 7/29/19 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | 10,322 | 5,160 | $ | 35.78 | 8/18/24 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | 3,956 | 7,912 | $ | 55.92 | 7/30/25 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | 5,635 | $ | 74.66 | 7/29/26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/13 | — | — | — | — | 758 | (3) | $ | 52,613 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | 1,224 | (4) | $ | 84,958 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | 2,236 | (4) | $ | 155,201 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | — | — | — | — | 1,651 | (4) | $ | 114,596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/18/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,676 | (5) | $ | 1,018,661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40,544 | (6) | $ | 2,814,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/30/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13,416 | (7) | $ | 931,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/8/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,776 | (8) | $ | 331,502 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/29/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,604 | (9) | $ | 458,384 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16,476 | 18,707 | 5,869 | $ | 407,368 | 80,016 | $ | 5,553,911 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | All stock options were granted pursuant to our 2011 Incentive |
(2) | Market value is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on December |
(3) |
Represents shares of restricted stock that vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. |
Represents performance units granted |
|
45 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
(5) | Represents performance units granted during 2018. These performance units are earned based on the growth of our annual adjusted EPS over each year (calculated separately) in the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2020, as may be further adjusted based on the TSR modifier. The final percentage of performance units earned is determined as the average of each of the three annual adjusted EPS payout percentages (as a percent of target) and then multiplied by the TSR modifier. The earned units will convert into unrestricted shares following the third anniversary of the performance unit grant date, or February 26, 2021, provided that the Compensation Committee has previously certified the performance results described above. In accordance with SEC rules, the number of performance units reflected in the table is based on an assumed achievement at the |
(6) | Represents performance units granted during 2019. These performance units are earned based on the same calculation as the performance units granted in 2018. In accordance with SEC rules, the number of performance units reflected in the table is based on an assumed achievement at the payout level of 300%, based on actual adjusted EPS during 2019 and no modification of such payout based on actual TSR for the three-year performance period. |
(7) | Represents synergy performance units granted in 2019 in connection with the merger with TSYS as anon-recurring, supplemental award. The synergy performance units are earned based upon the achievement ofpre-established synergy goals set by our Compensation Committee for the three-year performance period from September 18, 2019 to September 19, 2022. The number of shares issued, if any, will be based on the Company’s achievement of cost synergies of at least $350 million and revenue synergies of at least $125 million. The resulting payout multiple for cost synergies and revenue synergies would be averaged together to determine the payout multiple applied to the target award, and will range from 0% to 200% of target for our Chief Executive Officer and 0% to 300% of target for our other NEOs. In accordance with SEC rules and based on actual performance for 2019, the number of synergy performance units reflected in the table is based on an assumed achievement at the target performance level. |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 57
Stock Options Exercised and Stock Vested in the 2016 Fiscal Transition Periodduring 2019
The following table provides information on options exercised and stock awards that vested in the 2016 fiscal transition period.2019. The shares shown as acquired on exercise or on vesting represent shares of our common stock.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(2) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | — | — | 172,970 | $ | 13,539,577 | 132,686 | $ | 12,443,521 | 144,896 | $ | 22,878,595 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | 95,272 | 5,215,168 | 68,284 | $ | 5,343,588 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | — | — | 17,818 | $ | 1,286,058 | 16,000 | $ | 1,208,002 | 48,378 | $ | 7,467,242 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | 11,102 | $ | 337,153 | 28,406 | $ | 2,216,741 | — | — | 31,605 | $ | 4,815,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | 5,702 | $ | 321,340 | 4,472 | $ | 336,733 | — | — | 21,460 | $ | 3,377,815 |
(1) | Represents the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price of the options. |
(2) | Includes shares acquired on the vesting of (i) restricted stock awards and (ii) performance units granted in 2016. |
(3) | Represents the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date. |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 46
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Our named executive officersNEOs are eligible to participate in ourNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, or the deferred compensation plan. Mr. Sloan is our only named executive officer who participates.
The following table provides information on deferred compensation under the deferred compensation plan for each named executive officerNEO during the 2016 fiscal transition period. There were no2019. Mr. Sloan and Mr. Todd participate, but did not make any contributions or withdrawals, ornor did they receive any distributions, during 2019. In 2019, we added a 401(k) restoration program to the 2016 fiscal transition period.deferred compensation plan, in which the employee will continue to receive company match once they have reached the IRS income limit and are contributing on average annually 5% to the 401(k) plan. For 2019, the Company match will have a three-year cliff vesting restriction. Aggregate earnings (Iosses) are not includable in the summary compensation table above because they were not above-market or preferential earnings. The aggregate balance includes amounts previously reported in the summary compensation table above in the previous years when earned if the executive’sNEO’s compensation was required to be disclosed in a previous year.
Name | Aggregate Earnings in TP 2016 | Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2016 | Company Contribution in 2019(1) | Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in 2019 | Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | $ | 2,314 | $ | 93,203 | $ | 111,147 | $ | 24,891 | $ | 127,810 | |||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | — | — | $ | 43,839 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | $ | 58,584 | $ | 11,864 | $ | 208,670 | |||||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | — | — | $ | 34,493 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | — | — | $ | 32,791 | — | — |
(1) | The Company contribution was earned as of December 31, 2019 and will be deposited in the NEOs’ deferred compensation plan account in 2020. This contribution will vest on December 31, 2022. |
Pursuant to the deferred compensation plan, participants are permitted to elect to defer up to 100% of their base salary and other eligible forms of cash compensation (such as cash incentive bonus). Participant accounts are credited with earnings based on the participant’s investment allocation among a menu of investment options selected by the deferred compensation plan administrator. Participants are 100% vested in the participant deferrals and related earnings. We do not make contributions to the deferred compensation plan and do not guarantee any return on participant account balances. Participants may allocate their plan accounts intosub-accounts that are payable upon separation from service or on designated specified dates. Except in the case
58 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
of death or disability, participants may elect in advance to have their various account balances pay out in a single lump sum or in installments over a period of two to ten years. In the event a participant separates from service by reason of death or disability, the participant or his designated beneficiary will receive the undistributed portion of his or her account balances in alump-sum payment. Subject to approval by the deferred compensation plan administrator, in the event of an unforeseen financial emergency beyond the participant’s control, a participant may request a withdrawal from an account up to the amount necessary to satisfy the emergency (provided the participant does not have the financial resources to otherwise meet the hardship).
Pension Benefits for the 2016 Fiscal Transition Period
We maintain a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering our U.S. employees who have met the eligibility provisions. The retirement plan was closed to new participants beginning June 1, 1998, and none of our named executive officersNEOs were hired before that date.
Potential Payments Uponupon Termination, Retirement or Change in Control
This section describes the post-employment benefits that each of our named executive officersNEOs would be entitled to receive in connection with various termination of employment andchange-in-control scenarios.
47 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
Employment Agreements with Our Named Executive Officers
EachIn connection with the completion of our named executive officers is a party tothe merger with TSYS, Messrs. Sloan, Bready and Green and Dr. Sacchi each entered into an employmentamended and restated agreement with our Company.Company, and Mr. Todd entered into a new employment agreement. These agreements are each for an initial term of three years following the completion of the merger with TSYS and are automatically extended for one additional year on theirthe second year anniversary of the closing of the merger with TSYS and each yearanniversary thereafter unless either party provides notice ofnon-renewal before such anniversary date. The expiration dates for the initial term of each employment periods are set forth below:agreement is until September 18, 2022.
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
Each of these agreements prohibits the executiveNEO from disclosing our confidential information, soliciting our customers or recruiting our employees for a period of 24 months following the termination of employment.separation date. In addition, if the executive’sNEO’s employment is terminated by the Company or the executive,NEO, the executiveNEO has agreed not to compete with us generally for a period of 24 months. Thenon-compete does not apply if the executive’sNEO’s employment is terminated as a result of ourthe Company’s decision not to extend the employment agreement.
TheseThe employment agreements with the NEOs may be terminated by us at any time for “cause” (as defined below) or for no reason or by the executiveNEO with or without “good reason” (as defined below). The employment agreements will also terminate upon the executive’sNEO’s death, disability or retirement. Depending on the reason for the termination and when it occurs, the executiveNEO will be entitled to certain severance benefits, as described below, which may be delayed for such time as may be necessary to avoid a violation of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. “Cause,” as defined in the employment agreement,agreements, generally means (i) the failure by the executiveNEO to perform substantially his or her responsibilities after delivery of notice and a cure period of ten business days, (ii) engagement in any fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement or similar dishonest or wrongful act, (iii) substance abuse which materially interferes with the executive’sNEO’s ability to perform or the use of illegal drugs, (iv) violation of laws or Company policies regarding employment discrimination, harassment, conflicts of interest, retaliation, competition with our Company, solicitation of our customers or employees on behalf of anyone other than us, improper use or disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, or (v) commission of or conviction for, or plea of guilty ornolo contendere to, a felony or a crime involving dishonesty or other moral turpitude. In the case of Mr. Sloan, any determination of “Cause” requires a finding that such circumstances exist by not less than a majority (or, following a transaction constituting a change in control, not less than three-quarters) of the board. “Good reason,Reason,” as defined in the employment agreement,agreements, generally means (a) an assignmenta material adverse reduction in position, duties or responsibilities, (b) in the case of the executive to a materially different position, (b)Mr. Sloan, a change insuch that he no longer reports directly and exclusively to the person to whom the executive reports,board, (c) a reduction of the executive’sNEO’s base salary, bonus opportunity (to a target below the minimum specified in the agreement), or in welfare benefits (in each case, unless such reduction is made to similarly situated senior executives), (d) a failure of our Company to require asuccessor-in-interest to agree to perform our obligations under the employment agreement, (e) a requirement thatrelocation from the executive be based in any locationAtlanta, Georgia metropolitan
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 59
area (in the case of Messrs. Sloan, Bready, Sacchi and Green) or from the Columbus, Georgia metropolitan area, other than that which is initially specified ina relocation to Atlanta, Georgia (in the case of Mr. Todd), or (f) material breach by the Company of the employment agreement.
Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason When Not Related to a Change in Control.Control. If, prior to a change in control or on or after the second anniversary of a change in control, the executive’sNEO’s employment is terminated by us without cause or the executiveNEO resigns for good reason, the executiveNEO will be entitled to the following payments and benefits:
Accrued salary and benefits through the separation date, plus a pro-rata portion of his or her annual incentive bonus for the fiscal year of separation, based upon actual performance against certified pre-established bonus targets.date.
Continued payments of the executive’sNEO’s base salary for six24 months (in the case of Mr. Sloan) or if such payments are delayed by reason of Code Section 409A, make a lump sum payment equal to six18 months (in the case of the executive’s base salary on the date that is six months and one day after the separation date,other NEOs), in each case provided that the executiveNEO does not violate any restrictive covenants.
A prorated annual incentive bonus for the year in which the termination occurs, based on actual performance against certifiedpre-established bonus targets.
An additional cash payment equal to 2x (in the case of up to 12 additional months (orMr. Sloan) or 1.5x (in the earliercase of the executive becoming employed with a competitor or violating any restrictive covenants), we will continue to payother NEOs) the executive’s base salary,NEO’s target annual bonus opportunity, payable nine months after the separation date, provided that the executiveNEO does not violate any restrictive covenants.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 48
The NEO’s performance units granted following the closing of the executive’s restricted stock awardsmerger with TSYS will vest aspro-rata based on target performance (if termination occurs in the first year of the separation date,applicable performance cycle) or actual performance (if termination occurs after the first year of the applicable performance cycle). With respect to Messrs. Sloan, Bready, and Green and Dr. Sacchi, any such awards granted prior to the stock options that would have vested inclosing of the next 24 months will vest and remain exercisable for no more than 90 days from the separation date.
With respect to Messrs. Sloan, Bready, and afterGreen and Dr. Sacchi, restricted stock awards granted prior to the Compensation Committee certifies the results at the endclosing of the three-year performance period,merger with TSYS will vest as of the numberseparation date, and stock options granted prior to the closing of earned units will be based on actual performance, prorated based on the number of daysmerger with TSYS that would have vested in the three-yearnext 24 months will vest and remain exercisable for no more than 90 days from the separation date.
With respect to Mr. Todd’s stock options, restricted stock unit awards and performance period thatshare awards granted prior to the executive was employed. The resulting numberclosing of earned units willthe merger with TSYS, such awards were converted pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement into (a) in the case of Mr. Todd’s TSYS stock options, Company stock options and (b) in the case of Mr. Todd’s TSYS restricted stock unit awards and performance share awards, Company restricted stock unit awards. Such awards remained subject to the same terms and conditions (including vesting and payment terms) as applied to Mr. Todd’s corresponding TSYS awards immediately prior to the closing of the merger. Therefore, upon a termination of employment not related to a change in control, Mr. Todd would not be converted into an equal numberentitled to additional vesting with respect to such equity awards which were granted prior to the closing of unrestricted shares of our common stock.the merger with TSYS. Such awards would vest upon Mr. Todd’s termination without cause or upon a resignation for good reason as described below.
Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason When Related to a Change in Control.Control. If, within 24 months after a change in control, the executive’sNEO’s employment is terminated by us without cause or the executiveNEO resigns for good reason, the executiveNEO will be entitled to the following benefits:
Accrued salary and benefits through the date of termination.separation date.
A cash payment equal to 3x (in the executive 200%case of Mr. Sloan) or 2x (in the case of the other NEOs) the amount of the executive’sNEO’s then-current base salary as a lump sum payment or payments, provided that the executiveNEO does not violate any restrictive covenants.
A prorated annual incentive bonus for the executive 200%year in which the termination occurs based on (a) the NEO’s then-current target bonus opportunity, if the separation date occurs before the end of the year in which the change of control occurred, or (b) the actual amount earned based on certified results, if the separation date occurs during a year that began after the change in control occurred.
60 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
A cash payment equal to 3x (in the case of Mr. Sloan) or 2x (in the case of the other NEOs) of the amount of the executive’sNEO’s then-current target bonus opportunity, payable nine months after the separation date, provided that the executiveNEO does not violate any restrictive covenants.
All of the executive’sNEO’s restricted stock awards and stock options granted following the closing of the merger with TSYS (and, with respect to Messrs. Sloan, Bready, and Green and Dr. Sacchi, any such awards granted prior to the closing of the merger with TSYS) will vest as of the separation date, and the options will remain exercisable for no more than 90 days from the separation date.
The executive’s performance-based restricted stockNEO’s performance units (other than LPUs, which are described below)granted following the closing of the merger with TSYS will vest in full based on target performance (if termination occurs in the first year of the applicable performance cycle) or actual performance (if termination occurs after the first year of the applicable performance cycle). With respect to Messrs. Sloan, Bready and Green and Dr. Sacchi, any such awards granted prior to the closing of the merger with TSYS will convert into fully-vested shares of our common stock based on (i) assumed target performance, if the separation date of termination occurs before the end of the performance cycle in which the change in control occurs, (ii) the greater of assumed target performance or actual performance, if the separation date of termination occurs after the end of the performance cycle in which the change of control occurs, or (iii) actual performance, if the separation date of termination occurs during a performance cycle that began after the change in control occurred. If
With respect to Mr. Todd’s stock options, restricted stock unit awards and performance share awards granted prior to the dateclosing of the change in control occurs duringmerger with TSYS that were converted as described above into Company stock options and restricted stock unit awards, as applicable, upon the performance period and whileclosing of the executive remains employed by our Company, then the numbermerger with TSYS, a prorated portion of synergy units earned will be the greater of (a) the number of synergy unitssuch awards that would have been earned basedbecome vested on actual performance asthe next vesting date will become immediately vested, with stock options to remain exercisable for the remainder of the effective date of the change in control, as determined by the Compensation Committee or (b) the target award. Fifty percent of such synergy units will be converted to actual unrestricted shares on the effective date of the change in control. The remaining fifty percent will be converted to restricted stock on the effective date of the change in control.applicable term.
49 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement
The executiveNEO also will be eligible for comparable benefits if his or her employment is terminated without cause or if he or she resigns for good reason in anticipation of achange-in-control transaction. The employment agreements specify that a termination or resignation is considered to be in anticipation of achange-in-control transaction if itthe termination occurs after afollowing public announcement of achange-in-control transaction which would lead to a change in control and the transaction closes no later thanis consummated within nine months after termination(or, in the case of the executive’s employment.Mr. Todd, six months).
Death or Disability.Disability. Whether or not a change in control shall have occurred,occurs, if the executive’sNEO’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, the executiveNEO will be entitled to receive accrued salary and benefits through the separation date of termination and any other benefits that may apply, and allapply. All of the executive’sNEO’s performance units, restricted stock awards and stock options granted following the closing of the merger with TSYS (and, with respect to Messrs. Sloan, Bready, and Green and Dr. Sacchi, any such awards granted prior to the closing of the merger with TSYS) will vest. The executive’svest (in the case of performance-based awards, based on target performance), and the options will remain exercisable for no more than 90 days from the separation date. With respect to Mr. Todd’s stock options, restricted stock units (including synergy units but excluding LPUs) will convert into fully-vested shares of our common stock based upon assumedunit awards and performance atshare awards granted prior to the target level. The number of earned LPUs will be determined based on actual performance asclosing of the date of termination, prorated based on the number of days in the three-year performance period preceding the termination date, andmerger with TSYS that were converted as described above into unrestrictedCompany stock options and restricted shares following our Compensation Committee’s certificationstock unit awards, as applicable, upon the closing of the merger with TSYS, such awards will vest in full (in the case of time-vesting awards) orpro-rata (in the case of awards that were performance results as described above.share awards immediately prior to the merger with TSYS) upon termination due to death or disability, with stock options to remain exercisable for the remainder of the applicable term.
RetirementRetirement.. Whether or not a change in control occurs, if the executive’sNEO’s employment is terminated by reason of his or her retirement, the executiveNEO will be entitled to receive accrued salary and benefits through the separation date of termination and any other benefits that may apply, and allapply. All of the executive’sNEO’s performance units, restricted stock awards and stock options granted following the closing of the merger with TSYS (and, with respect to Messrs. Sloan, Bready, and Green and Dr. Sacchi, any such awards granted prior to the closing of the merger with TSYS) will vest. The executive’s performance-based restricted stockvest (in the case of performance units, (including synergy units but other than LPUs) will convert into fully-vested shares of our common stock based on actual performance as certified by the Compensation Committee at the end of the applicable performance cycle. Any outstanding LPUscycle), and the options will be treated inremain exercisable for no more than 90 days following retirement. With respect to Mr. Todd’s stock options, restricted stock unit awards and performance share awards granted prior to the same manner as a termination without cause or resignation for good reason,closing of the merger with TSYS that were converted as described above.above into Company stock options and restricted stock unit awards, as
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 61
applicable, upon the closing of the merger with TSYS, Mr. Todd would not be entitled to additional vesting with respect to such awards given that Mr. Todd will not be retirement eligible pursuant to the terms of the TSYS equity plans prior to the time when such awards become fully vested pursuant to their terms.
Termination for Cause or Resignation Without Good Reason.Reason. If we terminate the executiveNEO for cause, or if the executiveNEO resigns without good reason, the executiveNEO will be entitled to receive accrued salary and benefits through the separation date, of termination, but no additional severance amount will be payable under the terms of the employment agreement.
Change in Control Without Termination of Employment. Our compensation arrangements with our executivesNEOs are “double trigger,” meaning that in order for the NEO to receive severance payments and for the vesting of any of an executive’sNEO’s awards to accelerate upon a change in control, there must be achange-in-control transaction as well as a termination of employment without cause or resignation for good reason within 24 months after the change in control. Ascontrol (or, as described above, a result, if there is no such termination in anticipation of a change in control). In addition, receipt of severance payments and benefits, whether or resignation, then the vesting of the executive’s awards will not be accelerated in connection with thea change in control.
62 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 50
Potential Payments Table
The following table sets forth quantitatively the potential post-employment payments that are described above for each of our named executive officers.NEOs. The potential payments to our named executive officersNEOs are hypothetical situations only and assume that termination of employment and/orchange-in-control occurred on December 31, 2016.2019. The amounts shown in the table do not include payments and benefits to the extent they are provided on anon-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment, such as accrued salary and distributions of plan balances under ourtax-qualified 401(k) plan. The value of the acceleration of vesting of stock options, restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units are calculated based on the $69.41$182.56 closing price on December 30, 2016.31, 2019. The value of health carehealthcare continuation is based on COBRA 2016 rates.
Name and Form of Payment | Termination Without Cause; Resignation for Good Reason (No Change in Control) | Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (Change in Control)(1) | Death or Disability | Retirement | Termination for Cause; Resignation Without Good Reason | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 1,057,778 | 1,600,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | — | 3,200,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 4,249,558 | 4,249,558 | 4,249,558 | 4,249,558 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 2,127,979 | 2,127,979 | 2,127,979 | 2,127,979 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-based RSUs | 23,470,644 | (3) | 28,971,303 | (4) | 23,612,727 | (5) | 33,020,142 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 26,054 | 39,081 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 32,432,013 | $ | 42,187,921 | $ | 29,990,264 | $ | 39,397,679 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
David E. Mangum | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 900,000 | $ | 1,200,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 396,667 | 600,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | — | 1,200,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 1,497,729 | 1,497,729 | 1,497,729 | 1,497,729 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 732,957 | 732,957 | 732,957 | 732,957 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-based RSUs | 9,393,915 | (3) | 12,029,559 | (4) | 9,488,625 | (5) | 13,105,372 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 26,054 | 39,081 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 12,947,321 | $ | 17,299,325 | $ | 11,719,311 | $ | 15,336,058 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 825,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 327,250 | 495,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | — | 990,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 2,468,358 | 2,468,358 | 2,468,358 | 2,468,358 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 591,119 | 591,119 | 591,119 | 591,119 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-based RSUs | 7,623,509 | (3) | 9,799,244 | (4) | 7,670,916 | (5) | 10,669,636 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 22,974 | 34,461 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 11,858,210 | $ | 15,478,182 | $ | 10,730,393 | $ | 13,729,113 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 705,000 | $ | 940,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 279,650 | 423,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | — | 846,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 675,637 | 675,637 | 675,637 | 675,637 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 345,264 | 345,264 | 345,264 | 345,264 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-based RSUs | 4,739,558 | (3) | 6,212,109 | (4) | 4,786,930 | (5) | 6,742,973 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 26,054 | 39,081 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 6,771,163 | $ | 9,481,091 | $ | 5,807,831 | $ | 7,763,875 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 652,500 | $ | 870,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 244,446 | 369,750 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | — | 739,500 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 407,367 | 407,367 | 407,367 | 407,367 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 280,289 | 280,289 | 280,289 | 280,289 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-based RSUs | 3,485,007 | (3) | 4,349,834 | (4) | 3,556,083 | (5) | 4,854,882 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 26,054 | 39,081 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 5,095,663 | $ | 7,055,822 | $ | 4,243,739 | $ | 5,542,539 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Form of Payment | Termination Without Cause; Resignation for Good Reason (No Change in Control) | Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (Change in Control)(1) | Death or Disability | Retirement | Termination for Cause; Resignation Without Good Reason | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Sloan | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 2,560,000 | 1,600,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | 3,200,000 | 4,800,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 10,649,820 | 10,649,820 | 10,649,820 | 10,649,820 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 7,110,323 | 8,368,186 | 8,368,186 | 8,368,186 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 28,067,791 | (3) | 32,585,317 | (4) | 25,691,851 | (5) | 60,184,738 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 30,655 | 30,655 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 53,618,590 | $ | 61,033,978 | $ | 44,709,857 | $ | 79,202,744 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Cameron M. Bready | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 1,050,000 | $ | 1,400,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 1,113,832 | 805,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | 1,207,500 | 1,610,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 2,882,622 | 2,882,622 | 2,882,622 | 2,882,622 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 1,892,322 | 2,263,953 | 2,263,953 | 2,263,953 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 7,847,825 | (3) | 11,754,491 | (4) | 9,984,024 | (5) | 19,294,949 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 30,655 | 30,655 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 16,024,756 | $ | 20,746,721 | $ | 15,130,599 | $ | 24,441,524 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Todd | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 1,020,000 | $ | 1,360,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 316,116 | 714,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | 1,071,000 | 1,428,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 4,846,603 | 157,732 | 3,609,394 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 3,081,138 | 1,578,755 | 3,081,138 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 211,016 | (3) | 2,221,755 | 2,221,755 | (5) | 2,221,755 | (6) | — | |||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 24,778 | 24,778 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 10,570,652 | $ | 7,485,057 | $ | 8,912,287 | $ | 2,221,755 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Guido F. Sacchi | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 862,500 | $ | 1,150,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 850,565 | 575,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | 862,500 | 1,150,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 1,445,510 | 1,445,510 | 1,445,510 | 1,445,510 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 1,219,070 | 1,419,204 | 1,419,204 | 1,419,204 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 4,915,222 | (3) | 6,909,896 | (4) | 5,745,893 | (5) | 11,630,167 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 34,784 | 34,784 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 10,190,152 | $ | 12,684,395 | $ | 8,610,608 | $ | 14,494,882 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
David L. Green | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base salary severance | $ | 825,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Annual cash incentive bonus | 774,690 | 550,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other cash severance | 825,000 | 1,100,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock acceleration | 1,114,346 | 1,114,346 | 1,114,346 | 1,114,346 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option acceleration(2) | 981,285 | 1,132,785 | 1,132,785 | 1,132,785 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Performance units | 3,964,176 | (3) | 6,090,384 | (4) | 5,065,492 | (5) | 9,728,075 | (6) | — | ||||||||||||||||
COBRA | 30,655 | 30,655 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,515,152 | $ | 11,118,171 | $ | 7,312,623 | $ | 11,975,206 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
51 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 63
(1) | Assumes a change in control occurred on December 31, |
(2) | For the purpose of this calculation, outstanding unvested options having an exercise price greater than the closing price of our common stock on such date have a value of $0. |
(3) | Amount reflects 50% of the number of shares that would be issued at (i) 300% of target for the performance units granted in 2019 and 2018 (and no modification of such payout based on the TSR modifier for the three-year performance period) and (ii) the maximum payout levels (200% of target) for the performance units |
(4) | Amount reflects the number of shares that would be issued at (i) the target payout levels for the performance units granted in 2019 and 2018 (and no modification of such payout based the |
(5) | Amount reflects the number of shares that would be issued at (i) the target payout levels for the performance units granted in 2019 and 2018 (and no modification of such payout based the |
(6) | Amount reflects the number of shares that would be issued at (i) 300% of target for the performance units granted in 2019 and 2018 (and no modification of such payout based on the TSR modifier for the three-year performance), (ii) the maximum payout levels (200% of target) for the performance units |
64 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (excluding the Chief Executive Officer) and the annual total compensation of Jeffrey S. Sloan, our Chief Executive Officer. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K. Given the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratio, the estimated ratio reported below should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.
For 2019, our last completed fiscal year:
The annual total compensation of the median employee was $56,040; and
The annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table presented earlier in this Proxy, was $20,502,096 (which amount is exclusive of $15,046 in employer-provided health and welfare benefits).
Based on this information, for 2019, the ratio of the annual total compensation of the median employee to the annual total compensation of Mr. Sloan, our Chief Executive Officer, was 1 to 367.
To determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments and estimates that we used were as follows:
We selected December 31, 2019 as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee.”
We determined that, as of December 31, 2019, we had approximately 23,782 employees working at the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
As is permitted under SEC rules, we eliminated 1,010 global employees (approximately 4.25% of our total population) from the data set. A list of the excluded employees and their country of residency is provided in the table below.
Country | # of Employees | Country | # of Employees | Country | # of Employees | |||||
Austria | 4 | Italy | 1 | Romania | 10 | |||||
Belgium | 1 | Macao | 6 | Singapore | 23 | |||||
Brazil | 141 | Malaysia | 103 | Slovakia | 20 | |||||
Germany | 4 | Malta | 15 | Spain | 85 | |||||
Hong Kong | 142 | Mexico | 31 | Sri Lanka | 36 | |||||
Hungary | 51 | Netherlands | 130 | Taiwan | 51 | |||||
Ireland | 129 | New Zealand | 11 | United Arab Emirates | 16 |
To determine our “median employee” from our adjusted employee population, we used a consistently applied compensation definition and chose “base pay (actual).” We used a stratified statistical sampling methodology to provide a reasonable estimate of the median base pay for the employee population considered. We conducted an analysis using a sample of 23,782 employees. Then we identified employees who we expected were paid within approximately a +/- 10% range of that value, based on our assumptions that the median employee was likely to be within that group and that those within that group had substantially similarly probabilities of being the median employee. We then analyzed taxable wages for this group (annualizing pay for permanent employees who commenced work during 2019) to select a single median employee. We did not change our methodology or material assumptions, adjustments, or estimates from those used in our pay ratio disclosure for 2018.
Using this methodology, we determined that the “median employee” was a full-time, hourly employee located in the United States, with base pay (actual) for the12-month period ending December 31, 2019 in the amount of $46,763.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 65
With respect to the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” we identified and calculated the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2019 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of RegulationS-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $56,040 (inclusive of the value of employer-provided health and welfare benefits).
With respect to the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table, plus the value of employer-provided health and welfare benefits in the amount of $15,046, which was not included in the Summary Compensation Table.
Supplemental CEO Pay Ratio
We understand that the CEO pay ratio is intended to provide greater transparency to annual CEO pay and how it compares to the pay of the median employee. As such, we are providing a supplemental ratio that compares the Chief Executive Officer’s annual pay, excluding theone-time synergy performance unit award (see the “Synergy Awards” section), to the pay of the median-paid employee as we believe that this supplemental ratio reflects a more representative comparison. Using the same methodology above, the resulting supplemental CEO pay ratio is 286 to 1.
66 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Proposal Three: Approval of Amendments to our Articles of Incorporation to Eliminate the Supermajority Voting Requirements
After careful consideration and upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the board has unanimously determined that it would be in the best interests of Global Payments and our shareholders to amend the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, or the Articles of Incorporation, to remove supermajority voting thresholds and provide for holders of a majority of the total number of votes entitled to vote thereon to be able to take action on items that currently require the approval of the affirmative vote of the holders oftwo-thirds of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote. The board is now asking the Company’s shareholders to approve the amendments to the Articles of Incorporation as described below.
Global Payments’ Current Supermajority Standards
The Articles of Incorporation currently require the affirmative vote of the holders oftwo-thirds of the shares of the Company’s total issued and outstanding common stock entitled to vote to take the following actions:
Pursuant to Article 3.2 of the Articles of Incorporation, to remove directors from the Board for cause, and
Pursuant to Article 5 of the Articles of Incorporation, to alter, amend or repeal the bylaws, including any bylaws adopted by the Board, and adopt new bylaws.
Proposed Amendments
If shareholders approve these amendments to the Articles of Incorporation, the holders of a majority of the total number of shares entitled to vote thereon will have the authority to (i) remove directors for cause and (ii) alter, amend, repeal or adopt bylaws, including any bylaws adopted by the board (the “Amendments”).
The board has already approved amendments to the Company’s bylaws to change the voting thresholds required to (i) remove directors for cause; (ii) call a special meeting of the shareholders; and (iii) alter, amend, repeal or adopt new bylaws, in each case from the affirmative vote of the holders oftwo-thirds of the shares of the Company’s total issued and outstanding common stock entitled to vote to the majority of the total number of votes entitled to vote, with such amendments to take effect upon the filing of the Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation with the Georgia Secretary of State. If this proposal is approved and after the Amendments become effective, the Company will no longer have any supermajority vote requirements under our governing documents or under Georgia law.
Rationale for Proposed Amendments
In January 2020, the board voted to approve the Amendments and to recommend that the Company’s shareholders approve the Amendments at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The Company’s board is committed to strong corporate governance practices and regularly assesses ways to improve the Company’s practices. In determining whether to propose the Amendments, the board carefully considered various arguments in support of and against the Amendments. The board recognizes that a supermajority threshold for the removal of directors and amendment, repeal or adoption of bylaws may promote continuity and stability in the Company’s corporate governance practices. While the board continues to believe that these are important benefits, the board has also considered that supermajority requirements may have the effect of reducing the accountability of directors to shareholders, and recognizes the benefit of providing shareholders an opportunity to participate in corporate governance. The board also recognizes that a growing number of public companies have proposed eliminating supermajority voting requirements and these proposals have generally received strong support from shareholders.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement – 5267
Proposal Three: Advisory Vote on FrequencyIn view of the Vote on Executive Compensation
Asconsiderations described in Proposal No. 2 above, the Company’s shareholders are being providedboard, upon the opportunityrecommendation of its Governance and Nominating Committee, has unanimously determined to cast an advisory vote oneliminate the Company’s executive compensation program. The advisory vote on executive compensation described in Proposal No. 2 above is referred tosupermajority voting threshold as a “say-on-pay vote.”proposed.
Text and Effectiveness of the Proposed Amendments
The Dodd-Frank Act enables our shareholders to indicate how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. This Proposal No. 3 affords shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often the Company should include a say-on-pay vote in its proxy materials for future annual shareholder meetings (or special shareholder meetings for which the Company must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting). Under this Proposal No. 3, shareholders may vote to have the say-on-pay vote every year, every two years or every three years. Shareholders may also abstain from voting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast for any frequency. This is an advisory vote and, is therefore, non-binding.
After careful consideration, the board of directors has determined that an advisory vote on the executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate policy for the Company at this time, and therefore our board of directors recommends that you vote for an annual advisory vote on executive compensation. This advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation is non-binding on the board of directors.
You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years, three years or abstain from voting when you vote in response to the following resolution:
“RESOLVED,that the shareholders determine, on an advisory basis, whether the preferred frequency of an advisory vote on the executive compensationcomplete text of the Company’s named executive officers asproposed amendments to Article III and Article V of the Articles of Incorporation is set forth inbelow with deletions indicated by strike-throughs and additions indicated by underlining:
ARTICLE THREE
3.2 Removal. Directors may only be removed from the Company’s proxy statement should be every year, every Board of Directors for cause and only at a special meeting of shareholders called for such a purpose by the affirmative vote of at leasta majoritytwo years, or every three years.”
Assuming a quorum is present,thirds (2/3)of the option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highesttotal number of votes castof the then outstanding shares of the Corporation’s capital stock entitled to vote in the election of directors and only if notice of such proposal was contained in the notice of such meeting. Any vacancy in the Board of Directors resulting from such removal shall be filled in accordance with Section 3.3 hereof. For purposes of this Section, “cause” shall mean only (a) conviction of a felony, (b) declaration of unsound mind or order of a court, (c) gross dereliction of duty, (d) commission of an action involving moral turpitude, or (e) commission of an action which constitutes intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law if such action in either event results both in an improper substantial personal benefit and a material injury to the Corporation.
ARTICLE FIVE
AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS
Except as otherwise provided in this Article Five, the Bylaws may be altered, amended or repealed, and new Bylaws may be adopted, by shareholders will be(a) the frequency foraffirmative vote of the advisoryholders ofa majoritytwo thirds (2/3)of the shares of stock then outstanding and entitled to vote on executive compensation that has been selected by shareholders. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding onin the boardelection of directors, or (b) the Company inBoard of Directors of the Corporation, but any way,Bylaw adopted by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may decide that it isbe altered, amended, or repealed, or new Bylaws may be adopted, by the affirmative vote of the holders ofa majoritytwo thirds (2/3)of the shares of stock entitled to vote in the best interestselection of directors. The shareholders may prescribe, by so expressing in the action they take in amending or adopting any Bylaw or Bylaws, that the Bylaw or Bylaws so amended or adopted by them shall not be altered, amended or repealed by the Board Directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Section 4.05 of the Bylaws may not be modified, amended or repealed except by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of stock then outstanding and entitled to vote in the election of directors.
VOTE REQUIRED
The affirmative vote of shareholders holding a majority of our shareholdersissued and outstanding shares of common stock is required to approve the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our shareholders.proposed amendments.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERSYOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL
OF THE AMENDMENTS TO HOLD AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION EVERY YEAR (“1 YEAR”), AS OPPOSEDGLOBAL PAYMENTS’ ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO EVERY TWO YEARS OR EVERY THREE YEARS.
ELIMINATE THE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS.
5368 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement
Proposal Four: Ratification of Reappointment of AuditorsIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We are asking you to ratify the appointmentreappointment of Deloitte for the year ending December 31, 2017. If2020. Ratification of the appointmentselection of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is not ratifiedrequired by the shareholders,SEC or NYSE rules, Georgia law, the Company’s articles of incorporation or the Company’s bylaws. However, the board of directors is submitting the selection of Deloitte to shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If a majority of shareholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will consider the selection of other independent public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017.2020.
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the appointment by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Deloitte as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company, to audit the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for 2017,the year ending December 31, 2020, is ratified and approved.
The Audit Committee recommends, and the board of directors selects our independent public accountants. Our Audit Committee has determined that it is in the best interest of our Company and its stockholdersshareholders to continue to retain Deloitte, who served during the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, to serve as our independent auditorsregistered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017,2020, and the board has approvedratified the selection. Unless a shareholder directs otherwise, proxies will be voted for the approval of the ratification of Deloitte as independent public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017. A representative of Deloitte is expected to be present at the annual meeting. The representative will be given the opportunity to make a statement, if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.
In accordance with applicable SEC rules, the Audit Committee issued the following report on February 23, 2017.19, 2020. The Audit Committee consisted of the following members as of such date: Michael W. TrappWilliam B. Plummer (Chair), Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr., Connie D. McDaniel and John M. Partridge and Alan M. Silberstein,T. Turner, each of whom is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in a written Audit Committee charter, which is available on the Investor Relations section of our website atwww.globalpaymentsinc.com. The Audit Committee reviews the charter annually and, when appropriate, recommends any changes to the board for approval.
The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee is to oversee our financial reporting process on behalf of the board and to report the results of the Audit Committee’s activities to the board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and reporting process, including the systems of internal control, and the independent registered public accounting firm (Deloitte) is responsible for auditing those financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB, and issuing a report thereon.
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent auditorsregistered public accounting firm and meets with the Company’s internal auditors and independent auditors,registered public accounting firm, with and without management present (in person or by telephone), to discuss the scope, plan, status and results of their respective audits. In addition, the Audit Committee meets with management and the independent auditorspublic accounting firm to review the Company’s financial results and earnings press releases related thereto prior to their issuance.
In 2019, the Audit Committee held five meetings. Meeting agendas are established by the Audit Committee Chair, based on input from the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer. During 2019, among other things, the Audit Committee:
met with the senior members of the Company’s financial management team at each regularly scheduled meeting;
held separate private sessions, during its regularly scheduled meetings, with each of the Company’s General Counsel, the independent registered public accounting firm, and the head of Internal Audit, at
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement– 69
which candid discussions regarding financial management, legal, accounting, auditing and internal control matters took place; |
received periodic updates on management’s processes to assess the adequacy of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the framework used to make the assessment;
received periodic updates from management on the Company’s financial risk management practices;
reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte the Company’s earnings releases and quarterly reports on Form10-Q and annual report on Form10-K prior to filing with the SEC;
reviewed and approved the Company’s internal audit plan; and
participated, with representatives of management and Deloitte, in educational sessions about various relevant topics of interest to the Audit Committee.
Deloitte has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2002. Before retaining Deloitte for the 2017 calendar year ending December 31, 2020, the Audit Committee evaluated Deloitte’s performance with respect to its services to the Company provided during the 2016 fiscal transition period.2019. In conducting this evaluation, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management matters related to Deloitte’s independence, technical expertise and industry knowledge. The Audit Committee also reviewed Deloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee during the 2016 fiscal transition period2019 and considered Deloitte’s tenure. In addition, in order to ensure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the independent public accounting firm. The Audit Committee ensures that the mandated rotation of Deloitte’s personnel occurs routinely and is directly involved in the selection of Deloitte’s lead engagement partner.routinely.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy Statement– 54
In keeping with its responsibilities and the performance of its oversight function, the members of the Audit Committee as of February 23, 201719, 2020 have reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte our audited financial statements as of December 31, 20162019 and for the seventwelve months then ended. The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communication with Audit Committees). The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte its independence. In addition, the Audit Committee has considered the compatibility ofnon-audit services with Deloitte’s independence. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the members of the Audit Committee as of February 23, 201719, 2020 recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in our TransitionAnnual Report on Form10-K for the 2016 fiscal transition period2019 filed with the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Michael W. Trapp, ChairWilliam B. Plummer (Chair)
Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.
Connie D. McDaniel
John M. Partridge
Alan M. SilbersteinT. Turner
The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte during the 2016 fiscal transition period2019 and fiscal 2016 and 2015:2018:
2019 |
2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TP2016 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Audit fees | $ | 4,777,717 | $ | 4,464,413 | $ | 3,333,650 | $ | 6,512,400 | $ | 5,541,200 | |||||||||||||||
Audit-related fees | 199,500 | 355,200 | — | 495,661 | 170,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tax fees | 1,499,909 | 386,400 | 141,150 | 2,797,420 | 2,025,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other fees | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 6,477,126 | $ | 5,206,013 | $ | 3,474,800 | $ | 9,805,481 | $ | 7,737,273 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
70 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Audit fees. fees. Audit fees represent fees for the audit of our annual financial statements, the reviews of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q and the services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-related fees.fees. Audit-related fees represent fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not included under “Audit fees” disclosed above. ForEach period includes fees for reports on service organization controls and other fees associated with various initiatives by the 2016Company. In fiscal transition period,2019, the fees were for reports on Service Organization Controls in accordance with the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16, or the SSAE 16 report. In fiscal 2016, the fees werealso for services provided in connection with our merger with Heartland and for an SSAE 16 report.TYSY. Specifically, the services in connection with the merger included consultations and procedures associated with (i) the inclusion of unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information in our Registration Statement on FormS-4 filed in connection with the merger, or the Registration Statement, and (ii) our update of certain information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2015, or the Fiscal 2015 Annual Report, to reflect the retrospective effects of certain items occurring subsequent to the filing of our Fiscal 2015 Annual Report, which update was required in order to satisfy the disclosure requirements with respect to our Registration Statement.merger.
Tax fees.fees. Tax fees represent fees for tax compliance, tax consulting and advisory services. In the 2016 fiscal transition period, $70,0002019, $639,250 of the fees were for tax return preparation and compliance, and $1,429,909$2,158,170 were for tax consulting and advisory services. In fiscal 2016, $60,8002018, $236,248 of the fees were for tax return preparation and compliance, and $325,600$1,789,075 were for tax consulting and advisory services. In fiscal 2015, $60,800 ofservices related primarily to compliance with the fees were for tax return preparation and compliance, and $80,350 were for tax consulting and advisory services.
All other fees. There were no other fees for the periods presented.
55 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2017 Proxy StatementJOBS Act
Audit Committee Pre-ApprovalPre-approval Policies
The Audit Committee must approve any audit services and any permissiblenon-audit services provided by Deloitte prior to the commencement of the services, and is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the engagement. In making itspre-approval determination, the Audit Committee considers whether providing thenon-audit services is compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence. To minimize relationships which could appear to impair the objectivity of the independent registered public accounting firm, it is generally the Audit Committee’s practice to restrict thenon-audit services that may be provided to us by our independent auditorpublic accounting firm to audit-related services, tax services and merger and acquisition due diligence and integration services, but other permissiblenon-audit services are approved on acase-by-case basis.
The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committee the authority to approvenon-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm within the guidelines set forth above, provided that the fees associated with the applicable engagement are not anticipated to exceed $100,000.$250,000. Any decision by the Chair to pre-approve non-auditpre-approvenon-audit services must be presented to the full Audit Committee for ratification at its next scheduled meeting. All of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the foregoing policy.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE
REAPPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.
ACCOUNTING FIRM.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement – 5671
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
WeRelated Party Transaction Policy
The board of directors has adopted a written policy for the review, all knownapproval or ratification of certain transactions with related parties of the Company. Transactions that are covered under the policy include any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which: (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $100,000 in any calendar year; (2) the Company is a participant; and transactions in which we and our directors and(3) any related party of the Company (such as an executive officersofficer, director, nominee for election as a director or greater than 5% beneficial owners of Company stock, or their immediate family members are participantsmembers) has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
In determining whether to determine whether they qualify for disclosure asapprove a related party transaction, with related persons under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-Kthe Audit Committee evaluates the relevant facts and circumstances, including the fairness of the Exchange Act. We screen for these relationships and transactions through the annual circulation of a Directors and Officers Questionnaire, or a D&O Questionnaire, to each memberterms of the board of directors and each of our officers who is a reporting person under Section 16transaction, the benefit of the Exchange Act. The D&O Questionnaire contains questions intended to identify related persons and transactions between us and related persons. Our Employee Code of Conduct and Ethics requires employees to reporttransaction to the General CounselCompany, the impact on a director or Chief Executive Officer any transaction involving themselvesofficer’s independence, the availability of the goods or their immediate family membersservices from other sources and our Company that may create a conflict of interest with us, and further requires the Chief Executive Officer to approve in writing any such transaction with a related person. Any related-party transaction that would require disclosure pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K must be approved or ratifiedother facts considered material by the Audit Committee. There were no
The policy does not apply to transactions which occurred, or in the case of ongoing transactions, transactions which began prior to the date of the adoption of the policy by the board.
Related Party Transactions
Charles D. Todd, the brother of Paul M. Todd, the Company’s Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, is employed by the Company as a vice president and assistant treasurer following the completion of the merger with related persons required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K since June 1, 2016.
Transition Report on Form 10-K forTSYS. Charles D. Todd received $198,892 in compensation from the 2016 Fiscal Transition PeriodCompany during 2019.
A copy of our TransitionAnnual Report on Form10-K for 2019, including the financial statements and financial statement schedules (but without exhibits) for the 2016 fiscal transition period,, will be provided, free of charge, upon written request of any shareholder addressed to Global Payments Inc., 10 Glenlake Parkway, North Tower,3550 Lenox Road, Suite 3000 Atlanta, Georgia 30328-3473,30326, Attention: Investor Relations. Additionally, our TransitionAnnual Report on Form10-K is available on the SEC’s web site atwww.sec.gov.
Shareholders Sharing the Same Address
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering to that address a single proxy statement to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” provides convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies. Some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your broker or us that they or we will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revokenotify us or your consent.broker that you no longer wish to participate in householding. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement, or if you are receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement and wish to receive only one copy, please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account, or notify us if you hold registered shares. You can notify us by sending a written request to Global Payments Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 10 Glenlake Parkway, North Tower,3550 Lenox Road, Suite 3000, Atlanta, Georgia 30328-347330326 or by contacting Investor Relations at Investor.Relations@globalpay.com or (770)829-8478.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports
Based solely on a review of copies of Forms 3 and 4 filed with the SEC, or written representations that no annual forms (Form 5) were required, we believe that, during the 2016 fiscal transition period,2019, all of our officers, directors and 10% shareholders complied with the reporting requirements of the SEC regarding their ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock (as required pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act)., with the following exceptions: a
72 – GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. |2020 Proxy Statement
Form 4 with respect to each of Messrs. Todd and Woods reported an incorrect number of shares owned as a result of an error by our third party equity plan administrator and had to be amended. All errors have been corrected in subsequent filings.
We will maintain a list of shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting at our corporate offices at 3550 Lenox Road, Atlanta, GA 30321.30326. The list will be available for examination at the annual meeting.
57 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– 73
Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresPerformance Metrics for Determining Short-Term Cash Incentives
In this proxy statement, we disclose performance goals related to cash incentive awards under our short-term incentive plan based on adjusted EPS, adjusted net revenue plus network fees and adjusted operating margin, whichmargin. These performance metrics, as used herein, are non-GAAP financial measures.calculated for the sole purpose of determining compensation. Set forth below is a methodology for determining, and the rational for using, these terms.
Metric | Definition | Rationale for Use | ||
Adjusted EPS | Adjusted EPS is calculated by dividing adjusted net income attributable to the Company, excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rates, by the diluted weighted-average number of shares outstanding.
Adjusted net income attributable to the Company for 2019 reflects adjustments to remove (i) amortization of acquired | Adjusted EPS is a primary metric management uses to more clearly focus on the economic benefits to our core business and other factors we believe are pertinent to the daily management of our operations. | ||
Adjusted Net Revenue Plus Network Fees | Adjusted net revenue plus network fees for 2019 excludes(i) gross-up related payments associated with certain lines of business to reflect the economic benefits to the | Adjusted net revenue | ||
Adjusted Operating Margin | Adjusted operating margin is calculated by dividing adjusted operating income,
| Adjusted operating margin allows us to assess the quality and efficiency of our operations to promote a long-term outlook. |
Adjusted EPS, adjusted net revenue plus network fees and adjusted operating margin should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, GAAP diluted earnings per share, revenue and operating income, respectively.Becauserespectively. Because these performance metrics, as used herein, are calculated for the sole purpose of determining compensation, they may differ from similar thenon-GAAP financial measures reported elsewhere in Company filings.
74 –GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. | 20172020 Proxy Statement– A-1
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION 000004ENDORSEMENT_LINE SACKPACKMR A SAMPLEDESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4MMMMMMMMM ADD 5ADD 6Using a black ink pen, markGLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. 3550 LENOX ROAD, SUITE 3000 ATLANTA, GA 30326 SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE w Use VOTE the BY Internet INTERNET to transmit —www your votes with.proxyvote voting instructions .com or scan and the for QR electronic Barcode delivery above of or information thecut-off date up until . Have 11:59 your P .proxy M. Eastern card in Time hand the when day before you access the meeting the web date site voting and follow instruction the instructions form. to obtain your records and to create an X as shownelectronic ELECTRONIC If you would like DELIVERY to reduce OF the FUTURE costs incurred PROXY by MATERIALS Global Payments Inc. in X this example. Please do not write outsidemailing cards proxy and materials, annual you reports can consent electronically to receiving viae-mail all future or the designated areas.proxy Internet statements, . To sign up proxy for electronic and, when delivery, prompted, please indicate follow that the instructions you agree to above receive to vote or access using shareholder the Internet communications electronically in future years. VOTE Use any BY touch PHONE -tone —1 telephone-800-690-6903MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM C123456789000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 extElectronic Voting InstructionsAvailable 24 hours a to transmit your voting instructions up until Have 11:59 your P.M ..proxy Eastern card Time in hand the day 7 days a week!when before you call the and meeting then date follow or the the instructionscut-offInstead of mailing date . . Mark, VOTE BY sign MAIL and date your proxy you may choose one ofcard and return it in the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATEDpostage-paid 51 envelope Mercedes we have Way, provided Edgewood, or return NY 11717 it to. Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m., EDT, on May 2, 2017.Vote by InternetGo to www.envisionreports.com/GPNOr scan the QR code with your smartphoneFollow the steps outlined on the secure websiteVote by telephoneCall toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephoneFollow the instructions provided by the recorded messageAnnual Meeting Proxy Card 1234 5678 9012 345qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETBLUE OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E91286-P34767 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. THE BOTTOM PORTIONBOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL NOMINEES IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. qA Proposals — The BoardPROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4. 1. Election of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed in Proposal 1.1. Elect three directors:Twelve Nominees as Directors: For Against Abstain 1a. F. Thaddeus Arroyo ! ! ! For Against Abstain For Against Abstain01 -1b. Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. ! ! ! 1i. William B. Plummer ! ! ! 1c. John G. Bruno 02 -! ! ! 1j. Jeffrey S. Sloan 03 -! ! ! 1d. Kriss Cloninger III ! ! ! 1k. John T. Turner ! ! ! 1e. William B. Plummer, + Class II Class II Class IIThe BoardI Jacobs ! ! ! 1l. M. Troy Woods ! ! ! 1f. Joia M. Johnson ! ! ! 2. Approval, compensation on of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2.For Against Abstain2. Approve, on an our advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive basis, officers of the ! ! ! for 2019. 1g. Ruth Ann Marshall ! ! ! 3. Approval incorporation of amendments to eliminate to supermajority our articles of ! ! ! 1h. Connie D. McDaniel voting requirements. ! ! ! 4. R Deloitte a t i f i c a & t i Touche o n o f LLP t h e as a p our p o independent i n t m e n t o f ! ! ! For address changes and/or comments, please check this box public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal transition period.The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR every 1 year on Proposal 3.1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain3. Approve advisory voteending ! December 31, 2020. and write them on the frequencyback where indicated. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of NOTICE of the advisory vote on executive compensation.The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 4.For Against Abstain4. RatifyANNUAL MEETING and the reappointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP asPROXY STATEMENT and hereby revokes all Proxies previously given by the company’s independent public accountants.B Non-Voting ItemsChange of Address — Please print new address below.C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completedundersigned for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
the ANNUAL MEETING. Note: Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon and date below. Whereor names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each shareholderholder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or otherduly authorized officer.officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.C 1234567890 J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE ANDMR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE ANDMMMMMMM1UP X 3145181 MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND +02I8KE(Joint Owners) Date
DirectionsImportant notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders: The Notice and Proxy Statement and the 2019 Annual Report to Global Payments Inc. Annual Shareholder MeetingGlobal Payments Inc. 3550 Lenox Road Atlanta, GA 30321 770.829.8000Using GA 400 North to Connector State Road 141/Lenox Road NE. Take Exit 2 from GA-400 S. Merge onto Connector State Road 141/Lenox Road NE.Using GA 400 S/US 195S, follow GA-400 S, take Exit 2. Merge onto Connector State Road 141/Lenox Road NE.qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. qProxy —Shareholders are available at: www.proxyvote.com E91287-P34767 GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC.2017 3550 LENOX ROAD, SUITE 3000, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30326 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGTHIS PROXY IS OF SHAREHOLDERS OF GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. TO BE HELD APRIL 29, 2020 SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. AND MAY BE REVOKED BY THE SHAREHOLDER PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISEThe undersigned shareholder of Global Payments Inc. (the “Company”), Atlanta, Georgia,By signing on the reverse side, I hereby constitutesappoint Jeffrey S. Sloan and David L. Green andas Proxies, each of them singly and each with full power of substitution, to vote the number ofall shares of common stockCommon Stock of Global Payments Inc. of the undersigned or with respect to which the undersigned would beis entitled to vote if personally presenton March 6, 2020 at the annual meeting of shareholdersANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. to be held at the Company’s offices at 3550 Lenox Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30321, on May 3, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. EDT (the “Annual Meeting”), orApril 29, 2020, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, uponthereof. The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters likely to be presented for action at the proposals described in the Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, both dated March 21, 2017,of Global Payments Inc., other than the receipt of which is acknowledged, in the manner specified below. The proxies, in their discretion, are further authorized to vote on any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting, for the election of one or more persons to the Board of Directorsmatters listed herein. However, if any of the nominees named herein becomes unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, on matters which the Board of Directors does not know a reasonable time before making the proxy solicitations will be presented at the Annual Meeting, or any other matters which mayare properly comebrought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in this Proxy or their substitutes will vote upon such other matters in accordance with their best judgment. This Proxy is revocable at any time prior to its use. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED. IN THE ABSENCE OF SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4, AND ACCORDING TO THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY POSTPONEMENT OR ADJOURNMENT THEREOF. IF YOU DO NOT VOTE BY PHONE OR OVER THE INTERNET, PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Address Changes/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) (Continued and any adjournments or postponements thereto.This proxy, when properly executed, willto be votedsigned on the reverse side.)
*** Exercise Your Right to Vote *** Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on April 29, 2020. Meeting Information GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. Meeting Type: Annual Meeting For holders as of: March 6, 2020 Date: April 29, 2020 Time: 9:30 a.m. EDT Location: 3550 Lenox Road Atlanta, GA 30326 You are receiving this communication because you hold shares in the manner directedcompany named above. GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC. 3550 LENOX ROAD, SUITE 3000 This is not a ballot. You cannot use this notice to vote these ATLANTA, GA 30326 shares. This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. You may view the proxy materials online at www.proxyvote.com, scan the QR Barcode on the reverse side, or easily request a paper copy (see reverse side). We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. P34767 See proxy the materials reverse and side voting of this instructions notice to obtain . E91289—
Before You Vote How to Access the Proxy Materials Proxy Materials Available to VIEW or RECEIVE: NOTICE AND PROXY STATEMENT 2019 ANNUAL REPORT How to View Online: Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the undersigned shareholder.arrow XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX (located on the following page) and visit: www.proxyvote.com, or scan the QR Barcode below. How to Request and Receive a PAPER orE-MAIL Copy: If no directionyou want to receive a paper ore-mail copy of these documents, you must request one. There is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” the electionNO charge for requesting a copy. Please choose one of the director nominees namedfollowing methods to make your request: 1) BY INTERNET: www.proxyvote.com 2) BY TELEPHONE:1-800-579-1639 3) BYE-MAIL*: sendmaterial@proxyvote.com * If requesting materials bye-mail, please send a blanke-mail with the information that is printed in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposal 2 relatingthe box marked by the arrow XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX (located on the following page) in the subject line. Requests, instructions and other inquiries sent to thise-mail address will NOT be forwarded to your investment advisor. Please make the request as instructed above on or before April 15, 2020 to facilitate timely delivery. How To Vote SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE w Please Choose One of the Following Voting Methods Vote In Person: Many shareholder meetings have attendance requirements including, but not limited to, the possession of an attendance ticket issued by the entity holding the meeting. Please check the meeting materials for any special requirements for meeting attendance. At the meeting, you will need to request a ballot to vote these shares. Vote By Internet: Go to www.proxyvote.com or from a smartphone, scan the QR Barcode above. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX (located on the following page) available and follow the instructions. P34767 Vote By Mail: You can vote by mail by requesting a paper copy of the materials, which will include a proxy card. E91290—
Voting Items THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4. 1. Election of Twelve Nominees as Directors: 2. Approval, on an advisory vote onbasis, of the compensation of the Company’sour named executive 1a. F. Thaddeus Arroyo officers “FOR” Proposal 3 relatingfor 2019. 3. Approval of amendments to an advisory vote on executive compensation every one year, “FOR” Proposal 4 relatingour articles of 1b. Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. incorporation to the ratificationeliminate supermajority voting requirements. 1c. John G. Bruno 4. Ratification of the reappointmentappointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent 1d. Kriss Cloninger III public accounting firm for the Company’s independent public accountants, and with discretionary authority on all other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.YOU MAY VOTE BY TELEPHONE, THE INTERNET, OR U.S. MAIL.If you are voting by telephone or the Internet, please do not mail your proxy.year ending December 31, 2020. 1e. William I Jacobs 1f. Joia M. Johnson 1g. Ruth Ann Marshall 1h. Connie D. McDaniel 1i. William B. Plummer 1j. Jeffrey S. Sloan 1k. John T. Turner 1l. M. Troy Woods—P34767 E91291
E91292-P34767